Preview

Wellington Leadership Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wellington Leadership Summary
Wellington's Leadership Actions and Traits of Leadership
As mentioned in this topic’s preface, what previous generations of military leaders lacked in technology was compensated for with brilliant combat tact. A true maverick trait manifests itself as the ability to advance on opposition by way of surprise and deception. Arthur Wesley, the first Duke of Wellington, was a master of covert operations. His ability to think rationally and act coolly while under fire made him a dangerous adversary for any adversary. Combined, these characteristics of Wellington’s skill as a military leader helped secure victory for Britain in 1803 during the Maratha Battles (Harvey, 2008).
By utilizing economy of force, surprise, synergy, and most of all, discipline, Wellington’s modest 24,000 fleet of troops, managed to overwhelmingly trounce the main Maratha force of 200,000 men at Assaye. Contributing further to his reverence is the fact that Wellington participated alongside his soldiers; as quoted in the text, “the general was in the thick of the action the whole time and had a horse killed under him. No man could have
…show more content…
Campbell. Serving as mission commander for the operation in Afghanistan, Campbell makes strategic use of defensive measures in the manner of a modern 1st Duke of Wellington. The statistics agree - according to Ahmed, & Goldstein, (2015) article in the New York Times, combined forces of the US and NATO have conducted 128 air strikes in the past 3 months targeting low-level Taliban leaders, with very few spec-ops troops having been deployed on ground. As part of his Force Protection Campaign, these aerial assaults both take the enemy by surprise and defensively avoid ground

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This book contains the thoughts and communications between the British officers involved in the siege at Fort Pitt and the Battle of Bushy Run. This…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wellesley’s engagement with the Maratha forces in the face of overwhelming odds demonstrates great leadership qualities and proof that leadership traits coupled with basic military tactics were a successful method of attacking the enemy resulting in his finest battle. The leadership actions and traits demonstrated by Wellesley during Maratha have become a resource for future commanders to study, analyze, and execute during military…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coleman 1 Since its publication in 1973, The American Way of War by Russell F. Weigley has been a landmark volume on the United States' strategic methods for wartime success. He names two types of military strategy administered for success in wartime: attrition and annihilation. In From Gentility to Atrocity: The Continental Army's Ways of War, Wayne E. Lee fixates around the strategy of attrition and how Weigley blames the limited resources available to Washington as what dictated American strategic choices. He sees this as an oversimplification and suggests that an increase in the number of variables should be considered. Lee uses those multiple variables to compare the choices made in two campaigns, Philadelphia 1777–78 and Iroquois…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s operating environment, focusing on modularity with forces deployed across the globe, it is vital for Commanders to study, understand and apply Mission Command principles. During the Revolutionary War, the British had forces spread from New York to Charleston and communications were extremely slow. Like today, this type of environment would have benefited from the use of Mission Command principles such as shared understanding, clear intent, disciplined initiative and accepting prudent risk. Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis, an otherwise successful military leader throughout the war, failed to demonstrate these principles in the lead-up to and during the Battle of Yorktown. His failures from April 25 to October 19, 1781, would…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around one hundred fifty years ago, two superior, enemy armies faced each other outside a crossroads town in Pennsylvania. Neither army’s commander planned to battle at Gettysburg, but the assault took on a life of its own as soldiers in blue and gray rushed to the noise of bullets whizzing past them. Here, the battle would last for three days, leaving approximately 7,000 Americans dead and 30,000 wounded. The “vain and bad-tempered” (“Killer”), man Meade was ordered to take command of the Union army three days before the definitive battle, failing to eradicate Lee’s wrecked army, managing to let the army escape across the Potomac River before it could be seized, and not following through with the Henry Wager Halleck’s orders.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Harvey, Robert. (2008). Maverick Military Leaders: The extraordinary battles of Washington, Nelson, Patton, Rommel, and others. New York. Skyhorse Publishing, N.Y.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In bygone days, commanders were taught that when in doubt, they should march their troops towards the sound of gunfire. I intend to march my troops towards the sound of gunfire.[->0]”…

    • 5242 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We provide many large and small companies in the South Wales area with a manufacturing and service facility and we do so to exacting technical, quality and time constraints.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With these types of leaderships been different in the way that they lead a group they are suitable for different public services. For example, when fighting on the front line in the Army this is best suitable for the authoritarian leadership as you have to do what the leader says because by trusting what they say you are saving your own life by doing whatever they tell you to do.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war in Afghanistan started after the September 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States while President Bush was in office. President Obama was inaugurated as president on January 20th, 2009 and he picked up in the middle of a long war in Iraq and Afghanistan. After taking office, General Stanley McChrystal was selected to command NATO operations in Afghanistan. McChrystal submits a detailed report, to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, calling for a surge of 30,000 – 40,000 troops in Afghanistan. The general’s assessment reflects the “Polis Model” in that he writes “success demands a comprehensive counterinsurgency (COIN) campaign” and further writes “failure to gain the initiative”, “risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible”. This assessment gives the portrayal that increasing the troop count in Afghanistan is the only feasible option and that any other method would result in failure. To make matters worse, McChrystal’s 66 page assessment…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cannon balls stuck in the mud and did not bounce off the ground and take out some of the front line, as was intended. Napoleon's brother charged in with 5,000 troops to attack Wellington's army. Even though they outnumbered the 1,500 British troops who are in a hardened facility, they would not defeat them. The hardened facility had holes in the walls, allowing the British troops to take out Napoleon's troops as they marched on the structure. Napoleon continued his attacks all day, and around noon they managed to open the main gates of the structure allowing approximately 40 of Napoleon's men in. The British troops counterattacked and regained control of the main gates killing almost all of Napoleon's men. (The Battle of Waterloo BBC…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warfare was an integral component of the Cherokee culture and could be considered antithetical to European culture as it permeated into their daily life. The Indians perceived war as their “principle study” and accordingly, their “greatest Ambition” was to “distinguish” themselves by “military actions” (Fyffe 8). Even the elderly, who were far “past the Trade” of combat, make a conscious effort to rouse a “martial ardor” within the…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay was the 2006 George C. Marshall Lecture in Military History. Besides working as a historian, Dr. Faust is the current President of Harvard University.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gage sent out 1,500 men to search for the British. He considered this a reconnaissance in force. Once he knew exactly where the British were, one of Gage’s men, General Benedict Arnold, advised Gage to attack the British first instead of waiting to be attacked. Gage agreed and General Arnold led my Great Grandfather and his fellow soldiers into the forest to attack Burgoyne’s troops. They certainly caught them off guard!…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Battle of Yorktown, Francois de Grasse addresses that Cornwallis had been waiting for supplies in Yorktown (Hobart Article on the Battle of Yorktown) . Washington being humble, took Grasse’s advice and changed his course to find that Francois de Grasse was true. If Washington did not listen to Francois De Grasse, he would not have been able to win one of the biggest battles in the American Revolution. Adding on, in the Battle of Princeton, Washington had ordered and trusted Colonel John Cadwalader to find information on the British in Princeton. Colonel Cadwalader during his research received detailed information from a young man about the British works, cannons and force disposition, which George Washington put into great use in planning against the British ( Mount Vernon article, 10 Facts about the Battle of Princeton). If George Washington did not trust Colonel Cadwalader, he would not have performed as well as he did in the Battle of Princeton, but since Washington did trust the Colonel and took advice from the Colonel, he won a major battle and boosted the esteem of the whole continental army. Adding on, Washington proved his humbleness towards others and their advice in the Battle of Saratoga. Washington put his trust in…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays