Preview

Wetenschapsleer

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wetenschapsleer
HFD 1

Descriptive methodology = positive methodology: how it is
Positus ( ponere = put, place) e.g. position

Prescriptive methodology= normative methodology”: how it ought to be
Norm

Logical positvism =
Logicism = Scientific language is an extension of logic
Positivism = Empiricism (Knowledge arises out of sense experience)

The main aim of the logical positivist program was to demarcate (grenzen vaststellen van ) scientitific knowledge, distinguish science form pseudo-science and remove any kind of metaphysical. Their demarcation rule was to accept only analytic (tautologie – true by definition) or synthetic a posteriori (empirische onderzoek) propositions/statements as scientific knowledge.
Immanuel kant (1724-1804):
Analytic, synthetic a posteriori, synthetic a priori propositions
Synthetic a priori – universeel waar

Logical positivist were challenged by developments in mathematics and physics.
So:
No synthetic a priori, only synthetic a posteriori
Propositions must be empirically verifiable or analytical

David Hume (1711-1776) and Ernsest March (1838-1916) voorgangers van Logical positivists
Experience, especially from the sense, is the only source of knowledge (1) All evidence bearing on synthetic statements derives from sense perception, which are true by definition (analytic) (2) Predicates (beweringen) are meaningful only if it is possible to tell by means of sense perception (waarneming) whether something belongs to their extension, predicates must be empirically verifiable.

Verifiability principle: a synthetic statement is meaningful only if it is empirically verifiable

Summarized: (1) To formulate precisely such central philosophical notions as a criterion of meaningfulness (the verifiability principle) and the distinction between analytic and synthetic claims. (2) To develop precise definitions of central scientific notions such as thoery, explanation, confirmation etc

Logical positivists

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2: Quiz Paper

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages

    the principle that a scientific theory must make predications that are specific enough to expose the theory to the possibility of disconfirmation.…

    • 4252 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Describe the 3 different ways we use the term know. ACQUAINTANCE, A SKILL, TRUTH CLAIMS (PROPOSITION KNOWLEDGE- MAKES A CLAIM ABOUT REALITY)…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthetic propositions can pose a problem since they can be untrue. An example is the sun. We can say that it will rise tomorrow—which is likely to happen because we have experienced it before. However, it is not impossible that it will not rise. We don’t know that this will definitely happen. All we really know is that “First X happens, then Y happens” (93), and in our experience events like X are…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The analytical philosophers wanted to find out why they knew so much about history and about mathematical truths. The Vienna circle didn’t think that this was necessary because according to them "What remains is not statements, nor a theory, nor a system, but only a method: the method of logical…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A.J. Ayer furthered this point of view within modern philosophical doctrine with a varied response to his ideas known as the postulation of a strong and weak verification principle. Ayer argues that for a statement to be meaningful it must be either a tautology (a priori) or verifiable in principle (a…

    • 904 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justification. The person’s belief that p needs to be well supported, such as by being based upon some good evidence or reasoning, or perhaps some other kind of rational justification. Otherwise, the belief, even if it is true, may as well be a lucky guess. It would be correct without being knowledge. It would only be something else, something…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This then influenced A J Ayer who claimed in his publication of ‘Language, Truth and Logic’ that there are only two kinds of proposition being the truths known by definition, and the truths known by reference to sense…

    • 1272 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. State the four logically possible ways in which evidentialism could go about justifying its beliefs? Briefly evaluate each of the options. [20]…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    validity could be found in human matters that cannot be quantified. Fourth, he accepted the…

    • 2489 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The meaning of language and the principle of verification was at the forefront of debate in the 20th Century movement known as Logical Positivism. Philosophers such as A.J. Ayer, writing in Language, Truth and Logic and members of the Vienna Circle, wanted to be able to break down language into its simplest components. All meaningful propositions were divided into two categories, analytic and synthetic. Analytical…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    External World Skepticism

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) If we have two hypotheses that postulate qualitatively identical experiences, then we can’t know on the basis of experience which of the two hypotheses is correct.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Final

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For Kant, it is of the greatest importance that one distinguishes a priori from a posteriori judgments, as well as synthetic from analytic judgments. A priori judgments involve absolute necessity and strict universality, i.e. they are valid without variation for all cognizant beings. A posteriori judgments, on the other hand, are empirical and as such are necessarily synthetic. In the case of synthetic claims, the predicate is not contained in the subject, and are therefore ampliative and augment our knowledge. For example, the claim “All bodies have weight” is synthetic a posteriori because the concept of weight is not contained within the concept of body. Analytic claims, on the other hand, are such that the predicate is contained in the subject. Such claims may be called “classifying”; for instance, “all triangles have 3 sides” is an a priori analytic claim, because the concept of “having 3 sides” is contained within the subject of triangle. I am not building upon my knowledge of triangles when I consider such a statement. Analytic judgments are shown to be true directly through the principle of non-contradiction. All a posteriori judgments are synthetic, since it would not make sense to base analytic judgments on our experiences, since their truth value is determined by the meaning or classification of the terms. However, a priori claims may be either synthetic or analytic. An example of a synthetic a priori judgment is any mathematical equation, e.g. “7+5=12.” Though this is not readily obvious, since many believe such judgments to be analytic and that their validity is determined by the law of non-contradiction. Kant, however, shows us that such claims are in fact synthetic, because it is not a part of the concept of the summation of 7 and 5 to equal the distinct number 12. Only when we put instances of 7 and 5 together, paired with our intuition, will we discover that 12 is in fact their…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Psychology a Science?

    • 1261 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science is meant to be objective and unbiased. It should be free of values and discover the truths about what it is studying. Positivism is the view that science is objective and a study of what is real. For example, schizophrenia, when diagnosed as being caused due to excess dopamine, is being studied in a scientific manner. The explanation does not take into account any cultural customs or individual differences that might lead to 'schizophrenic ' behaviour. However, even in scientific research like this the person is doing the diagnosing has his or…

    • 1261 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays