Glg 101 Week 2 Critical Thinking Analysis
1. Each religion has many different views on life. For example Buddhism teaches us that life brings on constant changes and someone can always find a way to make him or herself or a situation better. It shows to view everything in a positive way rather than negative. Hinduism is one of the largest religion practiced today, though unlike Buddhism and Taoism, Hinduism believe in multiple God and each God teaches a different view. Hinduism believes in reincarnation, which is why they don’t kill cows or elephants. Taoism out of all 3 is the smallest religion and is a Chinese religion that practice living life with pure harmony leaving anything negative out. Which I honestly think is something that is very similar between all three, they all believe
…show more content…
To me analytic philosophy is looking at everything with more detail to really have a clear and genuine understanding of something, though this is something that began in the 20th century many people prefer this because it gives them a more clear understanding of what they need to know. Other philosophies look at things from a superficial view and don’t really search for deep information they just look for the answer they need and move on.
5. The contrast between logical positivist view and natural language theorist is the logical positivist like to pursue information that you can try and experiment with and find evidence and or proof to why the something is what is. Natural language theory is more of creating a foundation for talking about what research and different views those others may have. The similarity between them is that they both want/ need to find proof no matter the situation. They want to know their facts before arguing anything.
6. The analytical philosophers wanted to find out why they knew so much about history and about mathematical truths. The Vienna circle didn’t think that this was necessary because according to them "What remains is not statements, nor a theory, nor a system, but only a method: the method of logical
To me analytic philosophy is looking at everything with more detail to really have a clear and genuine understanding of something, though this is something that began in the 20th century many people prefer this because it gives them a more clear understanding of what they need to know. Other philosophies look at things from a superficial view and don’t really search for deep information they just look for the answer they need and move on.
5. The contrast between logical positivist view and natural language theorist is the logical positivist like to pursue information that you can try and experiment with and find evidence and or proof to why the something is what is. Natural language theory is more of creating a foundation for talking about what research and different views those others may have. The similarity between them is that they both want/ need to find proof no matter the situation. They want to know their facts before arguing anything.
6. The analytical philosophers wanted to find out why they knew so much about history and about mathematical truths. The Vienna circle didn’t think that this was necessary because according to them "What remains is not statements, nor a theory, nor a system, but only a method: the method of logical