Preview

What Are The Causes Of The Paxton Boys Rebellion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
991 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Causes Of The Paxton Boys Rebellion
Paxton Boys The Paxton Boys were frontiersmen Scots-Irish origin who were considered a vigilante group. The village of Paxton was a rapid growth for racial and political disorder during Pontiacs Rebellion. Pontiac’s rebellion was a way in 1763 that was between Native American Tribes that were unhappy with British postwar policies in the Great Lake region. The Native tribes were dissatisfied with the defeat of the French in the French and Indian war. Paxton was still populated with many Scot-Irish immigrants who were tired of the colonies reasons to not attack. The legislators, who were mainly Quakers, were the ones who were ignoring the request for army supplies and soldiers.
Penn’s long standing relationship with the natives was falling apart. Penn and the Quakers had made
…show more content…
Besides revealing the prevailing bias of frontiersmen against Native Americans, the Paxton Boys uprising also took on a political tone. Residents of the Pennsylvania backcountry were already embittered over the eastern counties’ disproportionate control over the colony’s legislature and the failure of the eastern-dominated legislature to provide adequate appropriations for defense of the frontier. Consequently, sparked by the events surrounding the Paxton Boys massacre (the Conestoga Massacre), about 600 armed frontiersmen marched on Philadelphia in January 1764 to vent their anger against the provincial assembly. A delegation of prominent Philadelphians, including Franklin, met the protesters and restrained them from entering the city by promising them that the legislature would provide a thorough hearing of their complaints. The assembly offered no redress for the protesters’ main grievances, though, and the colony’s Proprietary Party publicized the incident to their advantage in their campaign during the election of 1764.”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If not, tension always arises, creating a recipe for conflict and war. In New England, when the English settlers came, tensions emerged among the settling communities as well as the Native American communities. Land was a key factor in the tensions, driven by increasing English settlers and inter-tribal politics; the Pequot people carried the burden of what Philbrick terms as “European-style genocide”. The devastating brutality of the resultant conflict led all sides to seek accommodation and end the conflict. In both books, the themes, ideas and the driving forces that dictate the course of actions are similar, only that they happen at different centuries (Philbrick…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Cooper’s Town: Power and Persuasion on the Frontier of the Early Republic is an amazing piece of historical writing. Alan Taylor, the author of this non-fiction work, engages the reader with detailed descriptions and thoroughly researched facts, bringing the society of New York in the 1780’s and 1790’s to life. The book portrays the true story of William Cooper and his American dream-come-true. William Cooper, the main character, is the middle child of a poor Quaker farming family, who lived in Byberry, near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. From such meager beginnings, he slowly climbs the social hierarchy to become a prominent land owner and a U.S. congressman. Alan Taylor uses the events of William Cooper’s life to portray important…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Whiskey Rebellion showed that federal government would use force to implement and enforce policy. The Fries Rebellion was a semi-organized resistance to taxes. Eventually, several men were arrested and found guilty of treason; however, President John Adams pardoned the men. The federal government struggled with escalated reactions and defining the limits of democracy in addressing these “rebellions,” and how to assert control over states, and “The People,” without declaring war on fellow Americans in a country borne of discontent. Bouton posits that language differences between regions (English and German), caused Pennsylvanian resistance many organizational problems. This is arguable and likely not defendable. The language and communication problem would have been pre-existing. The presence of native, English, Scottish, Irish, German, French, and African (and Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch) peoples in the colonies created a creolized and multilingual population, and to some extent, communication negotiations would be normal. What other influences are at play in this divide? Bouton posits that Pennsylvanian regional differences and cultural practices influenced community agendas and escalated this division. However, he also assigns a level of complacency and assumption as variables, perhaps theory, that all of “The People” assumed that enough people held the same ideals and would join in the “movement.” The idea of disparate beliefs and agendas and ignorance of these beliefs and agendas is actually more plausible. The Pennsylvania elite controlling the political power base created a government in parallel to the federal actions. Eventually the federal and state governments did overturn some of the excessive taxing and regulations, but did not regress back to the pre 1776 notions of democracy supported by the ordinary…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arriving to North America, the Indians grew worried of the growing population of European settlers and colonists coming in and taking their lands. Though both Penn and Winthrop sought to gain lands for colonization, Penn had a more peaceful approach to the Indians. Penn would create good relations with the natives and the Quakers would negotiate over the lands in a just manner. Penn encouraged the Indian culture to come into the Quaker communities while Winthrop wanted to exclude the Indians out the Puritan communities. The Puritans in turn would just take lands from the Indians and force the Indians to fall back into the backcountry. Winthrop believed that the Indians “inclose no land, neither they have any settled habitation, nor any tame Cattle to improve the land by...we may lawfully take the [land].”…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are some doubts concerning the national government that Shay’s Rebellion expressed. One doubt was that in western Massachusetts, farmers were loosing their farms. The Massachusetts Legislature passed a couple of relief bills to help these farmers, but, the bills were blocked by the upper house. The farmers were so angry that they demanded the bills go into effect. Shay’s…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morton vs Bradford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Bradford was the leader of one of the earliest colonial settlements in the United States, of which Thomas Morton was a settler. Bradford documented his exploits in “Of Plymouth Plantation” to gain support from his home country and fellow colonists. Bradford’s work, however, differs from Morton’s “New English Canaan” which also describes the events which took place in the colonies and his views of the Cavaliers, the Indians, and the Pilgrims. Bradford applies his rhetoric to amplify God to respectfully reduce his poor mistreated people while Morton uses his to satirize those same people and to show off the superiority of his own learning. The contrast between Bradford and Morton can be not only to found the relation of the two authors and the nature of their rhetoric, but elevate essential moral questions about the whole colonial endeavor, particularly with respect to the Indians.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did The Mayflower Revolt

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages

    up to the arrival of the Mayflower, relations between visitors and inhabitants had grown increasingly tense.…

    • 3860 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the townspeople of Concord did little to protest these acts, and certainly not in the way Boston displayed their outrage. The people of Concord were more interested in the goings on in their own town, and thought other colonies could handle the dispute (Gross, 1). As was the case in most towns at this time, there was much political conflict present in Concord. The struggle came from a power struggle among the government officials, rather than the townspeople. Also, the town became too large to accommodate its entire population, many families living on the outskirts of town became disgruntled and longed to separate from Concord into another smaller town (Gross, 16). As it grew families settled further away from town buildings, schools, and churches (Gross. 15). Travelling several miles a day was not desirable to anyone. This became a major source of conflict among the townspeople. If granted status, then the town would lose land and the citizens would be responsible for paying a larger portion of the minister’s income (Gross, 16). The church presented another area of conflict, due to problems within the ministry. Not only were men vying for positions in the church, but also for government offices. Dr. Joseph Lee was at the center of this conflict. To obtain an office Lee had to gain the approval of the congregation and church officials. This was a problem for Lee, as he had issues with several members of the church (Gross, 23). The continued problems within the church caused division within the town and affected the way it responded to the Revolution (Gross,…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lackluster response to the Annapolis meeting might have been repeated the following spring, but for the violence that erupted in Massachusetts over the fall and winter. To Hamilton, Shays' Rebellion was the direct and inevitable result of the weak national government. The attempt by Massachusetts to pay off its war debts on its own had resulted in a crushing tax burden, especially for farmers unable to produce the required gold or silver currency. The consequence, in Hamilton's mind, was predictable: lawless mobs, assaults on property, and anarchy.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Penn Summary

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages

    John A. Morettam author of William Penn and the Quaker Legacy, presents William Penn's life in a very informational and positively biased story through his years. He looks majorily on the side that William Penn's decisions were right and that his childhood and young adulthood, founding of Pennsylvania, and in his later years his selling of Pennsylvania were all done well. William Penn accomplished a lot and was an esteemed gentleman, and the author really portays him as such while describing everything William did, as well as his relationships. And so the novel starts off with William Penn's father's influence on William Penn Jr. in many different ways. In the beginning of the story it was neglect. He was always gone and never had time for William Penn Jr. William Penn Jr. became very close to his mother as a result. Not having his fathers companionship created a lacking of a male role model, as well as his teachers lacking male role model potential. When William Penn Sr. moved his family to Ireland he was able to bond more with William Penn Jr. and this helped him and many different ways. His introduction to Quakerism was realized in Ireland when a preacher did a sermon at their house and William Penn Jr. was very moved by it. This proved vital with the combination of religious influence from his mentor and professors to young William's devotion to being holy later in his life. When the commonwealth and Cromwell died off the family exited exile and this allowed charles II to regain his throne. Sir William Penn was knighted for his devotion to the Stuart monarchy. This helps shape William Penn Jr.'s interests in the family reputation and makes him feel like he is a part of it, as his father wanted.…

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Penn Treaty Park Speech

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Indigenous site in Philadelphia that I chose to travel to was Penn Treaty Park. When I was much younger my mother took my brother and I to that park to ride our bikes. However, this time I had a different vendetta and the park was significantly more important. One of the first things I noticed when I walked into the park was a statue of William Penn. Surrounding his statue was a multitude of plaques with different types of scripture on them. One that caught my eye explained the history and importance of Penn Treaty Park. It explained that the treaty was made between William Penn and the Delaware Valley Indians in 1682. It is said that they made the peace treaty under an elm tree called, “The Great Elm of Shackamaxon.” While there I was…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The village of Paxton, Pennsylvania had become alive with racial and political unrest during Pontiac's Fighting against authority. The area was populated by many Scots-Irish people (who enter a country) who had grown tired of the weakness (that could be used to hurt someone or something) of attack. Requests for soldiers and gun had been ignored. A group of Paxton men took matters into their own hands. These men broke into a small settlement in Lancaster County.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “With regards to the riots in my home state, which you asked me about: I wish I could say that people exaggerated them.”. Shays' Rebellion was a protest in Massachusetts( 1786- 1787) led by Daniel Shays and his followers protesting economic and civil rights for the lower classes. They attempted to seize weapons and overthrow the government by showing up to courthouses with the weapons to free people like them, from the court . Although many historians think that the farmers were reckless rebels, nevertheless the farmers were freedom fighters because the government was unlawful, law enforcement had too much power, and Shays’ followers were standing up for themselves since no one was listening to them.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Puritans Vs. Quakers

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When these groups came into contact with each other or other migrants, it was not a pretty sight. Especially between the Puritans and Quakers there seemed to be an amplified amount of animosity between each other. This is partially due to the fact that they had such different views on so many things, one of them being how to treat Native Americans. Mary Rowlandson’s narrative of her captivity among the Narragansett Indians offers a later, more dystopian vision of New England. Her text denounces the sinfulness of her society, urges repentance, and provides a model for salvation. It shows the distaste the Puritans had for the Native Americans and how they thought of them as evil and threatening people that should be treated as animals. The Quakers on the other hand had a strong commitment to nonviolence, tolerance, and inclusiveness. Penn’s “Letter to the Lenni Lenape Indians” shows a respect for Native Americans’ culture and rights that is quite different from Puritan attitudes toward Native Americans. Theological differences between the Quakers and the Puritans led to hostility and persecution between the two powerful religious groups.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riots In Philadelphia

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The rally in Kensington was held May 3, 1844 (1844: Philadelphia ‘Bible Riots’). The political rally was met with opposition and the Irish Catholics because the party deliberately staged the rally in front of Kensington’s Nanny Goat Market which was a social hub for the community (Mandell). The American Republican Party chose to rally in the Kensington area because it was the origin of the dispute and it was a hotbed where many of the Irish and German immigrants settled. The American Republican party also used their nativist platform in order to join for a common cause which was to rally support before the elections of 1844 (Cohn 370). The Republican rally was driven away by the residents on the same day because the rallies’ premise was anti-immigrant in nature, but the Kensington area’s majority was Irish immigrants (Schrag). As a group, the American Republican Party pushed for restrictions on immigrant’s naturalization and voting process, but what they need was to have representatives of the party in legislative bodies (Riots in the City 2). The American Republican Party’s platform did not subside from the opposition on May 3rd (Pfleger 134). On May 6, 1844 the party returned in the thousands to provoke more conflict within the community. The nativist held another rally that had the same goal as the first: “to…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays