Preview

What Are the Differences and Similarities Between Marx's and Weber's Understandings of Capitalist Society?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are the Differences and Similarities Between Marx's and Weber's Understandings of Capitalist Society?
Essay: What are the differences and similarities between Marx's and Weber's understandings of capitalist society?

Introduction
Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) are two remarkable founding fathers of Sociology. Both of them spent huge effort to study the rise of capitalist society. Marx created conflict theory paradigm called Marxism while Weber inspired the symbolic interactionism, both paradigm are still influential nowaday. This paper would try to discuss the differences and similarities of their understanding of the historical development of capitalist society; their view on social stratification on capitalist society and their understanding on the operation and future prediction of the capitalist society in three parts.

Understanding of the historical development of capitalist society
The different perspective of Marx and Weber's methodology to the understanding of human history underline an important divergence of their understanding of the capitalist society. According to Engels' speech at Marx's graveside, (1883)

The 'law of development of human history' is "the production of the immediate material means of subsistence and consequently the degree of economic development attained by a given people or during a given epoch …… (which) form the foundation upon which the state institutions, the legal conceptions, art, and even the ideas on religion, of the people concerned have been evolved".

In other words, Marx in his Capital (1867) argued that instead of adopting Hegel's idealism in explaining the historical development of society, Marx maintained that the 'economic base' of 'infrastructure' of material life is important determinant of all other aspect of a society, including family, religion, politics, laws, education, etc, which Marx named it as the 'superstructure'. Owing to the fact that 'economic base' is the sole determinant all the other parts of a society, Marx investigated the capitalist society mainly on the economic



Bibliography: Barbalet, Jack (2012). 'Max Weber: Society as Culture ' Lecture on Classical Sociological Theory. Sociology Department, HKBU. Engel, Friedrich (1883). 'Speech at Marx 's graveside ' (17 March 1883) Marx, Karl &Engel, Friedrich (1848). Manifest of the Communist Party. MIA Library.website :http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#007. accessed 25 Nov 2012. Marx, Karl (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. New York: International Publishers. Weber, Max (1920). 'Fundamental Concepts of Sociology" Economy and Society. 1920 Weber, Max (1920). 'Bureaucracy" Economy and Society. 1920 Weber, Max (1905). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner 's.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How and why does Weber seek to establish a connection between the Protestant ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism?…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3)Giddens, Anthony.: Politics and sociology in the thought of Max Weber Anthony Giddens. London : Macmillan, 1972. 64p ; 21cm. ( Studies in sociology).…

    • 1754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the books introduction, Engels, one of the manifesto’s co-authors, defines the bourgeoisie as the class of the capitalist who controls means of production in society. Likewise, he considers the proletariat to be the working majority, which sells its labor to support a system it has no control over (7). Marx, on the other hand, works to apply moral judgments to these two classes, allowing for him to write on more than just a class struggle. His bourgeoisie is exploitative, manipulative, and inherently evil, while he sees the proletariat as the masses destined to rule itself (10, 17) .…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was Marx’s break with Hegel’s theories that led him to first look at the economy and ultimately led to him developing his theory of materialism. Hegel believed that the consciousness had a primary role in determining the world around us; society as we know it is a product of human thought and interaction. This is known as Idealism. Marx disagreed with Hegel on a number theoretical premises; firstly he disagreed with the emphasis and role Hegel had placed on Philosophy as this ‘.. led to the view that only philosophic categories were real, whereas the real problems of living individuals were overlooked and ignored’ (Morrison 2006). Secondly whilst Hegel believed that ideas acted as causes thus leading them to be important in the history of human development,…

    • 1286 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The work in the world of negotiation has been traditionally seen as something that cannot possibly contribute anything to God worship. Ambitions and wealth, property owning and exploitation of human labor (however slight and well rewarded) are considered sinful in the opinion of representatives of the traditional branches of Christianity, such as the Orthodox and Catholic churches. Yet Wayne Grudem claims that an effective work of any businessman can be a proper way to glorify the Holy Father. I suggest that we investigate some of the ideas provided by the author in his book “Business for the glory of God: the Bible’s Teaching on the Moral Goodness of Business”. They will be criticized from a few points of view, and certain remarks will be included based on the ideas of Karl Marx and John Kaynes.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx was, somehow, influenced by Hegel. If Hegel started from the “idea”, Marx, on the contrary, in all his philosophical, juridical, and political studies took his start from a strictly empirical principle. The Hegelian idea of “development” was completely “reversed” by Marx. He put in the place of the timeless development of the “idea” the real historical development of society on the basis of the development of its material mode of production.…

    • 4590 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 2538 Words
    • 11 Pages

    With that, the Materialist Conception of History is established; the struggle between the two classes and the modes of production can be documented as the driving motor of history, regardless of the economic system. I believe Marx's theory is extremely accurate and applicable to our present society, and with support of Marx's works, this leads me to believe Marx accounts are more convincing than Webers.…

    • 2538 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Heinrich Marx was a German economist, sociologist and philosopher who is considered to be one of the most influential theorist in our history. His works developed in a different era became the basis for philosophy, sociology and economics and continue to have a major influence in today’s society. He wrote several theories about economics and sociology in the Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital, which drafted the philosophy known as Marxism. Marx’s ideas on communism stemmed from his difference of opinion about the exploitation of the proletariat class. While a capitalistic economy creates an inequality and social division in society, Karl Marx’s ideas on how socialism is superior to capitalism is not valid in today’s society because capitalism…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber's Protestant Ethic

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages

    The writing of Weber indicates his sensitivity to diverse cultural meanings and his ability to find an ‘ethos’ or ‘geist” i.e. a spirit is largely indicative not of repudiating Marx’s economic analysis of society, but rather of rounding off Marx’s writings whilst valuing empathy, or understanding – ‘verstehen’ – in Weber’s native German. One of the primary questions that arose, for me, was why and where does this “rounding” off of Marx with empathetic understanding of the human condition emerge from?…

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1967) The communist manifesto (1848). Trans. AJP Taylor. London: Penguin.…

    • 3834 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays