Preview

What Are The Third Parties In America's Third Party System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Third Parties In America's Third Party System
Third Parties In America over 34% of registered voters are registered as independents. While only 33% identify as Democrats and 29% identify as Republicans. Yet since 1853 either a Republican or a Democrat has been president. In addition no third party candidate has ever been elected to the office of the presidency, despite their best efforts. Third party candidates are a different type of candidate that has to employ different tactics to get over obstacles and make their opinions heard. Since the birth of America’s two party system third party candidates have tried to run without being a Republican and Democrat, and none have succeeded. Some had little influence in the elections outcome and some have change the outcome. America’s two party …show more content…
The first person to challenge the third party system and did so successfully was President Theodore Roosevelt. In 1912 Roosevelt lost the Republican nomination, he founded the Progressive party (nicknamed the Bull Moose Party). He challenged the Republican nominee William Howard Taft and Democratic nominee Woodrow Wilson. Roosevelt received 28% of the popular vote and received 88 electoral votes (World Almanac). Roosevelt has been the only third party candidate to receive more votes and a major party. However, Woodrow Wilson easily won the election. Wilson won the election because Roosevelt’s new party was so similar to the Republican party that the Republican vote was split between Roosevelt and Taft. This left the Democratic vote whole and led to Wilson easily winning the election. Associate Professor of Political Science at Texas Tech Seth Mckee explained it as “Roosevelt cut the Republican party vote so much that Taft finished third”. This is a main reason why people don't consider third parties. They believe that their vote is “wasted” and would be better used for a candidate that has a better choice of …show more content…
If a third party candidate is “stealing” votes from them, it is easy for them to change the laws and make it more difficult for the third party to be present in the election. The biggest bureaucratic hurdle put in place by this duopoly is the ballot access laws. If you declare your intentions to run for president, you don’t automatically appear on the ballot in all fifty states. You instead have to petition in every state to appear on the ballot in that state. There are no federal ballot access laws. They are decided upon individually by each state. In Oklahoma, for example, you need 36,202 signature just to appear on the ballot (Nadar). This is over 1.08% of the entire state population. While this doesn’t seem like a lot, you have to remember that third parties don’t have tons of money to spend. The collection of these signatures usually entails volunteers going around door to door., and that is just to appear on the ballot. If you don’t receive enough signatures, then you are out of luck, because Oklahoma doesn’t allow write-in votes (Nadar). So if you don’t get 36,202 signatures they you can’t receive any votes in that state. In Virginia you have to collect 10,000 signatures, you need 400 from each congressional district. Also, the petitioners can only petition in the country they live in or one adjacent county (Nadar). This means that third

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a winner-take-all system because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes. The United States also has mostly single-member districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use multiple-member districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature. Also the way the US electoral college system is set up discourages third-party candidates. The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ID TERMS APUSH Chapter13-15

    • 3595 Words
    • 15 Pages

    3. Anti-Masonic Party: became first 3rd party in American presidential election. Opposed secrecy of Masonic order an 18th century fraternal organization using rationalist Christian doctrine, ritual symbolism, and civic virtue. Anti-Masonic party attracted evangelical groups eager to fuse moral and religious reforms with politics. National nominating conventions in all 3 parties: a bit like today’s system.…

    • 3595 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason why 3rd party candidates don't win in presidential elections is not because they are unqualified; it's because the electoral system that we have in place creates enormous obstacles for them. One obstacle is that 3rd party candidates get unfair representation in political debates on television and another is that 3rd party candidates have trouble mobilizing their voters to get to the polls.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While most of the country was tied up with the competition going on during the 2012 Presidential Election between the Democrat and Republican Presidential candidates, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, many other Americans were rooting for the underdogs. The gap between Romney and Obama in the popular vote was more significant than you'd think. Growing support for third party candidates don't have the major political parties worried, but evidence shows that they should think about gearing up for competition in future Presidential elections. With Gary Johnson, Libertarian Party 2012 Presidential candidate, ahead in the national popular vote amongst the third parties and the Green Party holding the majority of offices as compared to other third parties, the mainstream parties may have to begin gearing up against growing and very real additional competition.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Democratic and Republican Parties can trace their roots back to the 1800s, but some of the most interesting stories in American political history spring from parties which enjoyed flashes of glory before fading away for good.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Democratic and Republican Parties can trace their roots back to the 1800s, but some of the most interesting stories in American political history spring from parties which enjoyed flashes of glory before fading away for good.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The Presidential Election of 1832 was one of the first elections that had 3 different people run. The small Anti-Masonic party emerged with Wirt, but was defeated with it only having 7 percent of the vote. Andrew Jackson had an easy win.…

    • 2515 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that the extremes of the two-party system are becoming more moderate, so they are learning to work with each other and compromise. Noonan, a third-party supporter, says the opposite, that the two parties are so polarized as well as the citizens of the United States. Lizza would add that third-parties bring unvoiced issues to the table that is necessary to balance opinion. If Brooks is right, the other two opinions seem less convincing, but they are not insignificant. Personally, I would agree with Noonan that society and government is becoming extremely polarized. However, I don’t think a third-party is the remedy for the stark differences in opinion. Third parties, as Lizza said, do bring some controversial topics to the table, but, again, I don’t think this is enough to reform the strong partisanship in America. Brooks’s thought that the centrist ideology is calming the storm is the only hope we can…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 2000 election, Al Gore and Ralph Nader split the left wing vote. (Document 5). While Nader only won 3% of the popular vote, the election was so close that 3% more of the popular vote would have put Gore in office. (Document 5). This also happened in the 1912 election, when the Republicans split the vote between the incumbent Roosevelt, and Taft, allowing Wilson to win. The voters know that this will always be the result, so they do not vote for the party that their beliefs align with the closest. Instead, they vote Republican or Democrat to actually have a chance of winning the election. Third party candidates cannot win not only because of our two-party system, but because of our winner-take-all system. If two candidates split the liberal vote, the conservative party will win all the votes in that state. If this trend continues, the conservative party will win the entire election. (Document 6). If the United States based elections on the popular vote instead of the Electoral College, then people would be more likely to vote with the party they agree with most, not the party that is more likely to win. This would make citizens actually want to vote because they have more options and they would feel like their vote actually…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern political field is largely dominated by a two-party system of democrats and republicans who have representatives of their party in nearly every form of public office. This is the symbol for the libertarian’s misconception to the public that they because they don’t have large seats in public office it in return means they don’t have a solid argument. This however, is not the case when looking at the size of Democrats and Republicans simply because they have much greater attention from the press to speak policy and ideas, whereas the libertarian party lacks media attention to gain the traction that it potentially has. This lack of representation from the media has led to the suppression of the libertarian party, leaving the publics definition of them to be a simple third party. The libertarian party however offers much more than stealing votes in presidential elections, it offers a solution to the great moral crisis happening in America…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roller interviewed more than 30 protest voters. The voters said they believe that both Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton are comparably repulsive candidates, while others believed that they are two sides of the same coin. These voters believed their vote as a way, putting an end to power from the two untrustworthy parties. (cite). Also their vote is their way of giving a message to the parties. Their vote tells the candidates what the voters care about, what concerns them, and what they want. The candidates should do as Roller said, “Better to at least try to sweep them back under the big tent than cast them into the wilderness.” (Cite). Meaning the major party candidates better listen up if they want the votes instead of letting the third party candidates from taking them all or even worse the voters not voting at all. Third party candidates are pressing hard for votes as they look to gain funding that could then make them a legitimate threat to the candidacy. Much can be said that there is an increase in the younger generation voting third party. These voters will be voting for many years to come and do not believe in the same rational or party lines as their parents before them. They are free thinking individuals that want their voices heard. Protest voters are executing their democratic right to vote for who they…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the Electoral College a fair and true system? The Electoral College is the system in place to pick the next president of the United States. The issue with the Electoral College people think it is not fair because majority vote wins a whole state and it cancels like the rest of the votes. Every state has at least two votes. Votes or points are calculated by the amount of representatives the state has.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political Parties

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Acting as the organized opposition to the party in power- acting as the “watch dog” to the opposite in power…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Reagan Revolution

    • 3357 Words
    • 14 Pages

    First of all, the third party that currently exists is a faction of the conservative right. The Tea Party fits in line with the small government beliefs of the Reagan Revolution and not Obama’s belief in a large, active federal government. If the Tea Party does rise to power its ideologies would be a shift from Obama’s. In addition to the third party not aligning with Obama’s views, their influence has been steadily decreasing over time. Secondly, there is no outbreak of political activity. The opposite is true as both the House and Senate find themselves gridlocked, unable to pass any…

    • 3357 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays