Preview

What Causes Psychological Harm Research

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Causes Psychological Harm Research
This experiment seems very dangerous. This shock generator can cause the most deadly results and the authorities “teachers” continue on with this type of experiment. If it were me being one of the teachers that had to shock people, I would probably stop when it gets too risky for the “learner” on the other side of the wall. The teacher seems to be deemed by pressure when they realize how dangerous the machine can get and how much damage they’re actually doing to the person, but to follow the rules, they decide to keep going. An example is like when the electrician had to keep shocking the old man that had heart problems, he tried to blame the old man because he could’ve “tore out” of the straps. The electrician claimed he was doing his job, but he didn’t seem comfortable with what was going on and in the end he realized that he should’ve told the authority “No” so he wouldn’t have to put that man in any more pain that he was already in.
An ethical issue is a problem or solution that requires a person or
…show more content…
So yes, I believe that this experiment can cause a lot of psychological harm. The stress that the participants endured was great enough to cause psychological harm. They had signs of tension which were trembling, sweating, stuttering, nervous laughs, biting lips, digging fingernails into their palm, etc. People could have had very uncontrollable seizures. Stopping at a reasonable point to not put people through the agony like what happened back in Milgram’s actual experiment, was a great idea to do. Some people are willing to give dangerous shocks to obey the law, not knowing the problems that can take place afterwards. In Milgram’s official experiment, once the “teachers” seen that their learners were okay, their stress levels decreased dramatically. Milgram followed up with the participants after a period of time to make certain that there was no harm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tma01 Unit 2 Assignment

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Teacher was to ask learner questions. If they answered wrong they were to administer a shock…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Replicating Milgram (The Open University, 2014), Milgram explains how he set up his obedience experiment. His aim was to get a volunteer, a ‘teacher’ to inflict increasing amounts of pain, through electric shocks, to another volunteer a ‘learner’ and to see when the ‘teacher’ would turn to the researcher, the ‘authority figure’ and ask to stop. Unknown to ‘the teacher’, the ‘learner’ and the ‘authority figure’ were aware of the real purpose of the experiment; the ‘teacher’ was told it was to study the effect of punishment on learning, and genuinely thought that they were inflicting pain on the ‘learner’ sat in another room. It was this deception and the emotional stress it generated to the ‘teacher’ that prompted the ethical issues debate…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Milgram experiment was not done appropriately due to certain procedure taken place in the experiment. This would include the dishonesty and stress placed upon the teacher. The experiment was dishonest because it attracted the public by saying, “a study of memory…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prisoners started breaking down and feeling overwhelmed. One prisoner had been screaming and crying uncontrollable for 36 hours. Some of the other prisoners were showing signs of an emotional disorder that could have had lasting consequences. The experiment wasn't meant to have physically or mentally damage anyone so that's why the experiment was short lived.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Milgram's Study

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A weakness is that Milgram failed to protect his participants from psychological harm. Baumind (1964) attacked Milgram's study claiming that he had placed his participants under great emotional strain, causing psychological damage that could not be justified. Milgram defended himself by stating that he did not know how much stress participants would be under. Milgram also interviewed participants afterwards asking them if they had found the experiment distressing. At this point 84% were glad to have participated and 74% felt they had learned something of personal importance. Suggesting that the research was necessary to show the extreme of human obedience and that the psychological damage to participants was long-lasting.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    milgrams obedience study

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The experiment was inspired by the Holocaust - were the Germans in league with the Nazis, or where they simply following orders as they exterminated the Nazi's victims? Milgram wanted to study whether people would obey an authority figure, or would their own morals make them stop the experiment?…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment speaks to the 'nature of responsibility' and to see if the subject will stop the experiment…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The teacher is to give a pair of words to the learner, then the teacher is to repeat the first word and the learner is to repeat the second word that matches from the list of choice the teacher gives. For every question the learner answers incorrectly, he is to receive a “mild” electric shock, starting from 15 volts and increased by 15 per wrong answer up a maximum shock of 450 volts. The teachers did not know that there were no shocks and the procedure was perfectly safe. For every time a participant would refuse to continue on with the experiment, the scientist would give four different orders every time. The first order is “please continue,” the second is “the experiment requires you to continue,” the third is “it is absolutely essential that you continue,” and the last is “you have no other choice but to continue” (McLeod,…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the teachers were given the choice of what level to shock the learners for giving the wrong answer, the average shock was less than 60 volts. Three of 40 subjects did not go over the lowest voltage,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the test subject is in complete control over when the experiment can be stopped based on their own level of morals, it would not be considered proper to put the test subject in an environment like this that could be perceived as “hostile” without their complete knowledge of their part in the experiment. It would be impossible to inform the test subjects about the extremely stressful experiment they would be taking place in without informing them on exactly what they would be doing, and in this experiment, the discretion of the test was important to get clear and true results. Another immoral part of Milgram’s experiment was the severe psychological stress imposed on the applicants. Numerous participants stated that they felt extremely uncomfortable about what they were expected to do, although a sizable amount of the members in the primary trials subsequently pronounced that they felt vastly pleased to have been chosen to take part in the experiment. Another immoral aspect of the experiment was the fact that the test subject was not expressly given the right to withdrawal from the experiment, and were continuously given orders to continue the experiment. Milgram claimed that in this experiment strict orders were essential to…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram's (1963, 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don't think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did, they have to be willing to face the consequences of the experiment which could be a permanent damaged mental state. I do believe we need to do experiments like this as the outcome was very eye opening but it has to be better regulated and the background and methods of experimentation clearly…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    stanley milgram summary

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milgram’s objective is to see if the subjects will continue shocking as the voltage is raised. In his article he hypothesizes, “The point of the experiment is to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (Milgram63). This experiment was inspired by WW2, which had just roughly ended. Milgram saw the Nazis fulfill orders without any questions to carry out horrific acts. This made Milgram question just how far the average citizen would go in order to obey.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was not the case though, as stated in Harry Perlstadt’s “Milgram’s Obedience to Authority: Its Origins, Controversies, and Replications” there was significant harm to many of the participants in control of the electric shock. “Subjects could have suffered harm during the actual conduct of the experiment and/or experienced short- or long- term harm as a result of their participation.” (Perlstadt 62) The damage that Perstadt is referring to is not physical, he explains that many researchers who have looked over Milgram’s experiment believe that the participants could be harmed “if not through the stress of the experiment itself, then through the “infl icted insight” into their own personalities.” (Perlstadt 62) This idea is understandable to say the least. A large percentage of the world likes to believe that they are good people. At the end of this experiment the participants find out that although they did not actually harm anyone, put into the situation, they would have just because a figure of authority commanded them to do…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I feel the reason the Milgram Experiment subjects were lacking the moral and critical thinking of how they reacted to the experiment was a multitude of things such as. The subjects felt they had to because they were being told to by “people of authority” They also felt that since they were participating in the experiment and they were only doing “as told” then they were okay to proceed. Some also stated that do to the trust they had for the school and the prestige it represented it also made it harder to say to no.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays