Preview

What Happens When We Use The R-Word

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Happens When We Use The R-Word
The word “retarded” can never, in any form, be used “correctly”. Everyone says it. My best friends, my family, superiors, even families with a special need children. However, that doesn’t make it right. Strongly against the use of the word - stands John McGinley, Special Olympics Ambassador. In his Huffington Post Blog, “What Really Happens When We Use The R-Word,” the firm activist explains why this now commonly used word is always meant as a “euphemistic put-down”, and how it should never be used to define an individual with a disability. Instead, the word should be disposed of, and replaced with an alternative “with greater reliance on love, compassion, and grace.” Words hurt. They do. They always have. And they always will. McGinley frequently …show more content…

More often than not, it seems that the stimulated response falls along the same lines, “Well I didn’t mean it that way.” Justin McGinley takes a stab at those ignorant people in his blog when he states that, “When the suffix “-tard” is added onto any adjective or noun, the resulting conjunction is intended to render a word that will connote an inferior, idiotic or dumber-than-dirt, juxtaposed quantity.” By supplying his two sense, McGinley takes away any excuse of “not meaning to say it in a certain way”. He explains how most people use the word within a sentence, example gratia, saying a party is “retarded”. “When a party is said to be “retarded”, that party is understood to be insane, stupid, or just plain ridiculous.” Ergo, no matter the usage within a sentence, the word is seen as hurtful, and damaging to one's ego.
Not only has McGinley provided strong evidence against why the word should be demolished, he has also advocated for the Spread The Word to End the Word Campaign. This campaign raises awareness of the hurtfulness of the R-Word, and allows one to make an online pledge to never let the word cross their mind again, and to correct those when using it. This powerful campaign has been a complete success, already having 576,588 pledges for the surrender of the R-word. It allows the special needs community to unite as one, and for and for all banish the use of the


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    “About Being Considered ‘Retarded.’” by Amanda Baggs gives a great perspective on how those who have a disability are considered to be inferior or less human due to them being different from the societal standard of “normal”. To Baggs the way she looks and processes information is normal however compared to standards that society has placed she is different. To me Baggs is conveying the message that we label individuals who are different in this case those who have a cognitive disability and segregate them being considered normal due to the label of retarded.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “Disability”, writer, public speaker, and self-acclaimed “radical feminist, pacifist, and cripple” Nancy Mairs examines how the general public responds to individuals with disabilities as well as how the media portrays these aforementioned individuals (Mairs 12). She begins her essay by describing herself as a crippled woman with multiple sclerosis, speaking about her condition, and stating that she has never noticed a cripple woman like herself in the media. When the media does portray someone with multiple sclerosis- or a like disability, it’s focused almost entirely on the disability rather than the person’s character, indicating that their condition “devour[s] one wholly” (Mairs 12). Despite the fact that such disabilities…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tropic Thunder Analysis

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The reason being that it comes with too big of a price and would be useless as a permanent solution. Bauer discusses the aftermath of Rahm Emanuel’s use of the R-word being that government fought to remove the term “mental retardation” from government agencies and state codes.They used this to contrast the origins of the word’s use, to convey dignity and respect. Their argument being that no matter how many times we purge words with negative connotations and replace them, taboos would just materialize once more, as can be seen in the replacement of the word idiot. Bauer also said that if a word is too stigmatized people develop what she calls a “word fetish”. This phenomena is backed by the writings of Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy, making it credible information. The example provided to back both claims was the case of David Howard nearly being fired for using the word “niggardly”. Overall Bauer’s evidence for this claim support her arguments well. She makes it clear that restrictions on speech create needless taboos and government restriction.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world there are many different views on the use of swear words in everyday life. From evening family slot times to late night tv shows, cursing in society is slowly becoming part of our “normal” day to day language. Whether or not it is accepted is something different. Society has often labeled swearing one of two things: as an extreme type of language only used by the uneducated or the greatest use of power words that should be used by any and all people. Though swearing is offensive to many, it is proven to be a major extension of our vocabulary and should be tolerated and understood to a greater extent.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The adage “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me” is erroneous. The use of politically incorrect language may not break bones but it does inflict pain. As specified by Peg Streep, there is a connection between emotional and physical pain, so when a person is emotionally distraught, it can be compared to the pain felt when being physically harmed (Streep). According to “A Word Gone Wrong” by Lawrence Downes, words hold insinuations (Downes). For example, the word “retard” denotes a mentally handicapped person, but it connotes a person that is considered an imbecile. The word “retard” was not established to inflict pain on the people in which it defines; however, it has…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay, Goodman discusses the modern misuse of words that evoke Hitler and the Nazis. He suggests that those who are desensitized to hate words are introduced as being too readily used in many environments. In addition, the essay also brings out the fact that hate words are being loosely used by many politicians tells us that desensitization of hate words are prevalent can extend even to important social figures as well.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the United States law that allows freedom of speech, a debate continues on when using words that others find offensive. In an article by Patricia E. Bauer, she explains that the word retard or retarded should be banned in media and should not be used among individuals in daily conversations. Bauer’s daughter has down syndrome, an intellectual disability. What inspired her to write a lengthy blog post was when she and her daughter overheard someone using the word retard at the movies. She immediately cringed as many people would had if they take offense to the word. However as much as offended Bauer and Americans gets, it would be contradicting…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Other F-Word

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Leonard Pitts, nonfiction essay,“The other F-word” he uses powerful diction, evidence, and personal experiences to suggest that women need to be proud of their feminist’s values. He adopts a bold passionate tone in order for his mainly women audience to address the importance of this issue. Pitts opens his essay by powerful diction that makes the reader realize his passions on the subject. He starts by saying “I’m going to uses a word that offends folks. I’m talking the F-word.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are about 200 million people around the world that has “intellectual disabilities”? That’s three percent of the world’s population! The word ” retardate” once was used to describe a person with a mental disability. Today, however, it is used in the pejorative form ”retard” or “retarded.” Often unwittingly, the word is used to describe behavior that is “hapless,” “clumsy” and even “hopeless.” It is Important to bring awareness to our society; everyone needs to stop and think about his or hers use of the “R-word” (retard or retarded).…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cripple

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the essay “cripple” (1992), Nancy Mairs, implies that the word cripple is the better suited word for her because it does not hide the fact of what she really is and because handicapped or disabled is just a nicer way of saying cripple. Mairs made it clear that she wanted to be called crippled and not handicapped and/or disabled, it made her feel undeveloped and insecure. Mairs said society is no readier to accept crippledness than to accept death, war, sex, sweat, or wrinkles, in order to prove her point that society cannot see anything other than the way a person looks. The intended audiences are people that base their opinions on the looks of people and not their personality.…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.12). The National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics states that “Social workers should not use derogatory language in their written or verbal communications to or about clients. Social workers should use accurate and respectful language in all communications to and about clients” (NASW, 2008, p. 8, para. 1.12). When working with this population it is crucial for social workers to understand that derogatory language is degrading and will not be tolerated. In many cases derogatory language is used to describe individuals who have intellectual disability. It is also a social workers responsibility to educated the community about derogatory language and convey to the community that it is…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society comprises individuals and communities of remarkable diversity. In addition to racial, ethnic, social, economic, and religious differences, people also have physical differences, which include a wide spectrum of abilities. Along this spectrum lie a range of impairments, or disabilities, and to fully understand the implications of impairment and disability, it is important to define the two terms. In an effort to accomplish this, and to illustrate two opposing views on impairment and disability, the ideas of artist-activist Liz Crow and film director-producer Josh Aronson will be examined. In doing so, the argument will be made that in order to move toward a society where prejudice and barriers no longer…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate Speech in America

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I. According to the 1942 “fighting words doctrine” established by the U.S. Supreme Court; “Any words that incite violence or aggression towards a specific group based on race, creed, sex, sexual orientation, or…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Correctness

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The use of Political Correctness in an attempt to not offend certain social groups often does not work due to the fact that it is taken to extremes. It may be okay to call a “crippled” person “handicapped”, but calling them “differently abled” is taken too far and seems to be more offensive to the handicapped person then being called a “cripple”. Since when is it offensive to call a house pet “pet”? We now have to call our “pets” “animal companions”? As stated in Source D, “…these changes alter language to the point of obscuring, even destroying, its meaning.” Many in favor of political correctness would argue that these extremes are taken only to prevent hurting the feelings of others, my refute is that there is another way to phrase words to not offend a person without completely altering and destroying our language.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One wrong word could offend the public, mostly because of the amount of sociopolitical movements gaining ground. Every big company has to be politically correct so they don’t offend anyone. The point of marketing is for companies to get on the public's good side if they want them to buy their products. Well in order to get in good with the public the company has to avoid using offensive language and graphics. Bud Light, the beloved beer company set out to make their beer sound like the perfect beverage for people to have a fun night with. They tried to hit this mark by starting the #UpForWhatever campaign where they print different slogans on the side of their cans. One of the slogans chosen read “The perfect beer for removing ‘no’ from your vocabulary for the night”. The public took offense right away, as they should have because one of the biggest ongoing sociopolitical campaigns is anti-rape. Anti-rape is all about their slogan “no means no” conveying the message that everyone requires consent for any type of physical interaction. The way that Bud Light decided to phrase their slogan “removing ‘no’ from your vocabulary” is extremely contradictory of the anti-rape campaign and therefore got them in a large amount of trouble with the public. The backlash was astonishing. Twitter was outraged, many users tweeted back at the company expressing their disgust in the pro-rape…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays