result of selection for the stream phenotype. In this case, on a molecular level, the different phenotypes would be a result of differences in DNA sequences that control gene expression in the gills and tail. If the different phenotypes were due to selection for plasticity, however, genetic changes would control the response to the environment and genes would be differentially expressed in different environments in A. barbouri, but not A. texanum. Though the first case may seem more likely, previous research has shown that A. barbouri has a more plastic response to factors such as the amount of yolk present in eggs than A. texanum (Landberg, 2014). If A. barbouri has evolved a more plastic response in regard to yolk size, it may also have evolved plasticity in other areas. To learn whether the traits characteristic of A.
barbouri are genetically or environmentally determined, A. barbouri juveniles should be raised in a low-oxygen and predator free environment. If these individuals develop the gills and tail characteristic of A. texanum, we may conclude that the A. barbouri phenotype is a result of environmental influence on development. If these individuals retain the small gills and large tail seen in other A. barbouri, we may conclude that the populations have diverged due to selection for these traits. Additionally, A. texanum juveniles could be raised in a high-oxygen and predator rich environment. Transferring A. texanum individuals into this environment could potentially expose a hidden reaction norm and show how A. barbouri initially
diverged.