Preview

What Is Aquinas Argument About That Principle

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Aquinas Argument About That Principle
Thomas Aquinas
Summa Contra Gentiles Book One: God
Chapter 50: That God has a Proper Knowledge of All Things

I. Invoking the principle that an effect is known when its cause is known, Aquinas argues recursively that God has a proper and complete knowledge of everything there is. A. What was Aquinas’ argument about that principle?
1. Argument: “There is consequently nothing in any thing that is not caused by God, mediately or immediately. Whatever is in each and every thing can be known if we know God and all the causes that are between God and things.” (SCG 1.50.2)
2. Answer: God is the first cause of everything. The cause Aquinas has in mind is not about chronological set of events, but rather simultaneously existing dependency relationships.
…show more content…
Answer: All things have causes. Intermediate causes are the causes between the first cause until its final effect; they are the intervening causes among the first cause and the final cause.

II. God knows the nature of a being in their essential accidents
A. Does God know things as they are distinct from one another?
1. Argument: “The eesential accidents of being are one and many… If, then, by knowing Hid essence, God knows the nature of being in a universal way, it follows that He knows multitude.” (SCG 1.50.6)
2. Answer: Beings in their nature have essential accidents and it varies from one to another. As God is an all-knowing God, he knows multitude, because it cannot be known without distinction. So God knows things as they are distinct from one another.

III. God will be the dullest of all knowers
A. Why would God be the dullest of all knowers if he would fail to know things in their distinction?
1. Argument: “If, then, God does not know things in their distinction, it follows that He is the most foolish being of all…” (SCG 1.50.10)
2. Answer: Human beings and non-human beings know the diverse things from one another. If this God does not know all the distinctions of all beings (creatures), then he is not God, because a God who is the Supreme Being, is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aquinas also presented an argument to support design qua purpose. Similarly to Paley, he argued that all natural occurrences show evidence of design. He claimed that this suggested there is a being which directs all things, and as humans have knowledge this being must also be knowledgeable. Therefore there is an intelligent being that directs everything towards its purpose, and Aquinas stated that this being must be God. Unlike Paley, Aquinas explained that God is a designer at work who continues to direct us towards our purpose as well as regulating the universe (e.g. the planets and the seasons). He also attempted to explain how free-will plays a part in design, claiming that we are programmed to reproduce but free-will allows us to choose who we reproduce with. Through these points he also demonstrated a key aspect of the design qua regularity side of the Teleological Argument.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. “Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, se not and having ears hear not the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?” He was trying to explain the fact that we have eyes but we don’t truly see what is in front of us. We have ears but we only hear what we want to hear, he is asking why do we do this.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnathan

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Read the following passage from "Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God." Questions 1-4 are based on your analysis of this passage.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One objection to this argument can be found in line 3, per Saint Thomas' account of omnipotence which states that God is omnipotent by definition, that for any logically possible state of affairs, it is possible for God to bring something about.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    beings can have no cause from outside of it, because all things that ever were are supposed to be included in the series. The series also can not have a cause from within because no one being within the series is necessary. An example of this would be the set of real numbers we use today. Taking one number away from the set would not cause the set to cease in existence. There is no beginning to the number set and no end as well. If we view the Universe with the same concept then Aquinas' theory can be seen to have a major flaw.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. How are the attributes of God different from the attributes you and I might adopt for ourselves? See (p. 1152.)…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chp 5 Dr.Beckers book

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages

    After briefly introducing the concept of revelation within Christian theology, this chapter first explores the problem of talking about God in our secular world, particularly about the objections to God-talk, especially from the atheistic position. The chapter then proceeds to discuss what Christian theologians call "the general revelation of God." This type of revelation is based on the natural knowledge of God which is generally or universally available to all human beings. The chapter investigates various objections to such knowledge, most especially those within atheistic critiques of both religion and God. The chapter then describes the principal positions that Christian theologians have taken regarding the possibility of a natural knowledge of God.…

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will: (i) state the premises and conclusion of St. Thomas Aquinas's “Uncaused Cause” argument, I will argue that the argument is a deductive argument. Merriam-Webster.com's definition of cause is: “something or someone that produces an effect, result, or condition: something or someone that makes something happen or exist”. (www.merriam-webster.com) A deductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that the conclusion is true. An inductive argument is an argument in which the premise or premises claim to prove that in most cases the conclusion is true. I will argue that the argument is a priori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that can be obtain based…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aquinas observed the universe and saw that everything in the universe was working towards a purpose for e.g. Tress growing leaves every spring and losing them every autumn. He noticed that they lacked intelligence, but there was regular pattern of leaves growing and dropping off at changes of seasons.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    God can be conceived to exist in something greater than understanding Therefore P2 is false 6. Therefore God exists in reality (and…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my essay I shall discuss Aquinas’ understanding that blame is excusable due to ignorance if and only if they are involuntarily ignorant. I shall outline Aquinas’ understanding of voluntary ignorance and involuntary ignorance as an excuse from blame. Then I shall analyse this view, and conclude that whether or not the individual is blameable can, in some cases, only be prescribed by the individual.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This first cause is God. Or put another way, the universe could not just exist on its own—someone or something must have made it. This cause of the universe is God” (Theological Studies). The Cosmological Argument states that every true contingent proposition…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Guide to the perplexed Mosses Maimonides posits the idea that God can only be described only through his effects. To support his argument, he analyzes the five ways in which a thing can be described. The first way is through the use of a full definition of the subject. Here Maimonides asserts that in order for a subject to be given a definition there must first be previous causes that constitute the definition.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays