Logical Fallacy
What is Fallacy???
Explain Please!!!
Example Please!!!
Fallacy = mistake in reasoning
What is Fallacy?
Fallacious Argument = Argument that contains a mistake in reasoning
What is fallacious argument?
Two types of fallacy are:
Two types of fallacy?
Valid Argument:
Fallacious Argument:
Fallacy of Relevance: arguments in which the premises are logically
P1: Joe has two brothers
P1: Joe has two sisters
irrelevant to the conclusion.
P2: Joe has a sister
P2: Joe has three kittens
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence: arguments in which the premises,
C: Joe is not the only child
C: Joe is the only child
though logically relevant to the conclusion, fail to provide sufficient evidence for the conclusion.
The rejection of a person’s argument or claim by means of an attack on the
Fallacy of Relevance
1)
Personal Attack
Mubarak, the President of New Kolan, has argued against
person’s character rather than the person’s arguments or claim.
illegal human trafficking. But Mubarak is an out-of-wedlock
Arguer attacks the character of another arguer.
child and keeps on hiding the story behind his dumb face.
(ad hominem)
Therefore, his arguments about illegal human trafficking are flawed. Criticizing a person’s motivation for offering a particular argument or claim,
Fallacy of Relevance
2) Attacking the Motive
Mr Ishak has suggested in favour of building a new terrace
rather than examining the worth of the argument or claim itself.
of houses for the poor people at Merbok. But why we
Arguer attacks the motive of another arguer.
should accept his suggestion? As the CEO of Batu Bata Petak
Constructions, of course he has his own agenda behinds it.
1
The rejection of another person’s arguments or claim because that person
Fallacy of Relevance
3) Look Who’s Talking
fails to practice what he or she preaches.
The arguer attacks the hypocrisy of another arguer.
(Tu Quoque)
Ah Pek: Hi fellow friends, as a senior member in this cell,
I would like to urge you to stop doing any crimes!
Ah Li: Look who’s talking! This cell is his second home.
Attempting to justify a wrongful act by claiming that some other acts are
Fallacy of Relevance
4) Two Wrongs Make a Right
Mama: Megat, stop hitting your brother!
just as bad or worse.
Megat: Well, he punched and kicked me.
Arguer tries to justify a wrong by citing another wrong.
Threatening harm to a reader or listener, when the threat is irrelevant to
Fallacy of Relevance
5) Appeal to Force
Papa: Mimi, you better stop playing the video game now
the truth of the arguer’s conclusion.
because the bulldog is going to bite your fingers like
Arguer threatens a reader or listener
cookies.
(Scare Tactics)
Mimi: OMG!!!
Attempting to evoke feelings of pity or compassion, when such feelings,
6) Appeal to Pity
however understandable, are not relevant to the truth of the arguer’s
But I don’t deserve this speeding ticket. I’ve had a really
conclusion.
tough week. Yesterday I got fired from my job, and last
Arguer tries to insert some emotional feelings to readers or listeners.
Fallacy of Relevance
“Tok , I know I was going 120 km/h in a 30 km/h school zone.
Wednesday, my lovely girlfriend had died of swallowing a marshmallow, and my mom had chased me out from her house. I got no one now,” said Muaz to a police officer.
An appeal to a person’s desire to be popular, accepted, or valued rather
Fallacy of Relevance
7) Bandwagon Argument
Lobbyist: All of you should join the UiTM Single is Happy
than to logically relevant reasons or evidence.
Club as all the dean’s list students do so. In fact,
Arguer appeals to a reader’s or listener’s desire to be accepted or valued.
Nora Danish and Yusri KRU like it too.
2
The misrepresentation of another person’s position in order to make that
Fallacy of Relevance
8) Straw Man Fallacy
Minah has argued on the statement given by Adam that
position easier to attack.
Kolej Malinja is a better hostel than Kolej Murni. She said
Arguer misrepresents or distorts an opponent’s view.
that Kolej Murni is not a bad hostel. It has a great number of facilities, and located near the faculties. Clearly, Minah speaks out of her mind.
An attempt to sidetrack an audience by raising an irrelevant issue and then
to reduce baby dumping cases in Malaysia. However, the
diversion.
most serious social illness is about gossiping. If all people stop loafing, chit-chatting and gossiping the whole day, we
issue.
9) Red Herring
claiming that the original issue has been effectively settled by the irrelevant
Arguer tries to distract the attention of the audience by raising an irrelevant
Fallacy of Relevance
Zubaidah has argued that immediate steps should be taken
could even develop a strong community. Frankly, I would say that Zubaidah’s view is funny.
The use of a key word in an argument in two (or more) different senses.
Fallacy of Relevance
10) Equivocation
Liza: If you want to see the stars, look high at the sky.
A key word is used ambiguously or equivocally (give two or more distinct
Faris: Hmmm... I can’t see Farid Kamil, Fasha Sandha or even
senses).
Johnny Depp at the high sky. They are big stars right?
Liza: Oh goshhh (while knocking her head at the wall)....
An arguer states or assumes as a premise the very thing he or she is trying /
11) Begging the Question
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
12) Inappropriate Appeal to
seeking to prove as conclusion. (repetition of the premise and conclusion)
Shira: Why you say so?
Arguer assumes the point to be proven.
Kiera: because think critically is hard. Therefore it is difficult.
An arguer cites a witness or authority who, there is good reason to believe,
Fallacy of Relevance
Kiera: Critical Thinking is difficult.
My maid, Latipah Karno told me that her uncle, Rano Karno
is unreliable.
was the founder of Sabak Bernam. So, it is sensible to
Citing a witness (proof) or an authority that is untrustworthy.
believe that Rano Karno did find Sabak Bernam.
Authority
3
An arguer claims that something is true because no one has proven it false
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
13) Appeal to Ignorance
Aimi: I would say that baboons are handsome and sexy.
or vice versa.
Aiman: You are nuts!
An arguer treats a lack of evidence as reason to think that a claim is true or
Aimi: No! I’m not. No one has proven that they are not!!!
false.
An arguer poses a false either / or choice.
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
14) False Alternatives
“Look, the choice is simple. Either you support Kamal, a true
Arguer claims that there are only two relevant choices when, in fact, there
honest and pious man or you support a lazy fat horse to be
are more than two.
the class representative. Of course you don’t want to support a lazy fat horse, right? Therefore, you should support Kamal,” said Karmiella as to support her boyfriend.
Question that contains an unfair or questionable assumption.
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
15) Loaded Question
Tina: Are you still dating with that total loser Nizam?
It occurs when an arguer asks a question that contains an unfair or
Elly: Yes
unwarranted assumption.
Tina: Well, at least you admit he’s a total loser.
Explanation: Tina’s question is asking for two things:
[dating with Nizam] + [Nizam is a total loser]
-
The answer from Elly is only to answer the first intention, but Tina came out with the unfair conclusion. An arguer claims, without adequate evidence, that one thing is the cause of
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
16) Questionable Cause
“One month after I had the critical thinking examination, my
something else.
ears blockage cleared up completely and I’m now can hear
Claiming without sufficient evidence that one thing is the cause of others.
clearly. So do your critical thinking examination if you want to hear clearer,” said Johan to his friends.
An arguer draws a general conclusion from a sample that is biased or too
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
17) Hasty Generalization
My two Indonesian maids, Lili Kurni and Lila Kurna always
small.
fail to wake up in early morning. Therefore, I would say that
Jump to the conclusion with the insufficient evidence / reason.
all maids are hard to wake up early.
4
An arguer claims, without sufficient evidence, that a seemingly harmless
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
18) Slippery Slope
We can’t allow Hafiz to join our club, because Hafiz is the
action, if taken, will lead to a disastrous outcome / result.
leader of the Gang Pencil and surely he will ask us to write
An action, if considered, leads to a very bad result.
an essay of 35,000 words. We for sure don’t want to write an essay of 35,000 words, right?
An arguer compares two (or more) things that are not really comparable in
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
19) Weak Analogy
“Nobody would buy a car without first taking it for a test
relevant respects.
drive. Why then should not two mature secondary school
When the comparison goes between “apples and oranges” (expression).
students live together first before they decide whether to get married or not?” asked a student to his counsellor.
It occurs when an arguer asserts inconsistent or contradictory claims.
Fallacy of Insufficient Evidence
20) Inconsistency
“I’m talking rubbish only if I hold irrational principle. For the
Two statements are inconsistent when they both can’t be true.
time being, I don’t hold any irrational principle but I think this state is being governed by monkeys, birds and snails,” said Fahmi loudly.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The second fallacy used by Kellyanne was Ad Hominem/Personal Attack. In this fallacy, a person makes abusive remarks…
- 170 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Straw Man Fallacy- The argument is weak and it can be easily refuted. Being in jail doesn’t proof his guilty.…
- 355 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
-Arguing to prove a point such as a debate in a courtroom or to win a vote.…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
a. Begging the question; This is the “begging the question” fallacy to support their argument. What they are saying in both the claim and the support can be reformed into one sentence which would then leave them with no actually support of the argument being made. In other words, the arguer completely restates the argument in the support.…
- 753 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Within the chapters five and six of, They Say/I Say, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein, they believe that while writing an essay, one may use many tools to help them strengthen their arguments. For example. Instead of rambling on about why a writer’s argument is credible, a writer may address criticism that others might say, and can use counter arguments to lengthen and strengthen their argument. When a writer does not implement counter arguments within their text, they may seem close minded. However, when using a counter, or what Birkenstein and Graff call a “Naysayer,” a writer must accurately represent that individuals view. When a person is addressing a nay-sayer, they can either keep them anonymous, or give them proper labels. Although,…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This statement is an ad Hominem argument. This type of argument tries to invalidate the writer of another argument, not the argument itself. The person made this argument against Sam to nullify Sam’s opinion, not directly disproving Sam’s argument.…
- 726 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
direct form of dehumanization. These verbal insults lead to not only your view of yourself,…
- 1184 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
From the list below, select the name of the rhetorical device that attacks the arguer…
- 2514 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
(TCOs 7 & 9) Which option best depicts the fallacy found in this passage: If cigarettes aren't bad for you, then how come it's so hard on your health to smoke?…
- 272 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are several instances that lead to errors in written, oral, and visual arguments. Either/or thinking is in the believing that there are only two choices, when there may be more. To correct this error you should conscientiously search out all points of view before choosing one. Avoiding the issue may occur by an unintentional misunderstanding or by an unconscious slip to something irrelevant. To correct you should look closely that the issue and ask…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
3. Ad Hominem- Ad Hominem is when someone else is talking ill about someone else when it doesn’t have to do with the argument.…
- 630 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“In epidemiological studies of dog bites, the pit bull is overrepresented among dogs known to have seriously injured or killed human beings, and, as a result, pit bulls have been banned or restricted in several Western European countries, China, and numerous cities and municipalities across North America. Pit bulls are dangerous.”…
- 324 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
References: Boss, J. (2012). Critical Thinking And Logic Skills For Everyday Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In his article, “Blacks Should Stop Agitating for Political Equality,” Atlanta Exposition, 1895, Booker T. Washington said that blacks should take advantage of the new opportunities given to them rather than fight for more rights. Though he understood this tendency, saying, “… it is not strange that in the first years of our new life we began at the top instead of at the bottom; that a seat in Congress or the state legislature was more sought than real estate or industrial skill; that the political convention or stump speaking had more attractions than starting a dairy farm or truck garden.” He also said, “The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly.” This means that he did not want his fellow blacks to fight for more rights when they already had many new ones to benefit from.…
- 253 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Spoken statement that refers to spoken Defamation (insult) that is malicious and is in reckless disregard of the truth…
- 2047 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays