Preview

What Is Interrogation?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Interrogation?
An interview is when a person that is not suspected in a crime is questioned but knows something about the crime or the people involved (Hess & Hess, p. 184). Interviewing is an attempt to solicit information from a witness by using persuasive or congenial methods. It involves gathering information by talking to people and questioning them. At a crime scene, the main sources of information are the witnesses, the victim, and the complainant. In some cases these sources are the same person.
An interrogation is the questioning of a suspect that is directly or indirectly involved in a crime (Hess & Hess, p.184). It is usually more difficult to question a suspect than questioning a witness or a victim. Once the suspect is identified and located, the person can admit to the crime, make a statement, or confess to that crime (Hess & Hess, p. 190). An interrogation is accusatory. Investigators use behavioral methods to determine if the suspect is telling the truth. By using tactics such as using statements instead of asking questions can allow the person to confess.
…show more content…
This right must be known to the suspect before the investigators can question that person. The general meaning and application of the Miranda warning is that once an officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed a crime, that person’s constitutional rights are in jeopardy unless the Miranda warning is given before any questioning (Hess & Hess, p. 191). The term “in custody” is when an officer decides that a suspect is not free to leave, has been arrested, or where there is considerable deprivation of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law enforcement agencies have strategies such as psychological behavior and cognitive behavior in interrogation. Interrogation is a guilt presumptive process focusing mainly on extracting information from suspects. In criminal court they want to collect admissible evidence and charge the defendant with that crime.…

    • 43 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Being cautious and prepared is key for interrogating suspects. The interrogation location should be free from distractions or interruptions. The interrogation room should be well lit and secure. It's important that the officer not ask close ended questions. Asking closed ended questions will lead to short yes or no responses. Asking open ended questions will lead to a broader response and more information will likely come out. Taking notes and recording the interrogation is also key. Although there are many types of interrogation techniques, the officers should discuss the role they will be playing before hand. They can decide which type of interrogation technique will bring out the best results. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT By Harvey Wallace and Cliff Roberson(CHAPTER 9 PAGES 139-145)…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society almost all policemen never forget to read the person under arrest their rights because they know about the Miranda vs Arizona case. I believe that they have put more pressure on the police to say the rights because its a matter of the criminal getting let go because they forgot to read them even if the person already knows their rights. If in case that that does happen I still would not let the criminal go if the case was for something bad or something that would harm…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    miranda v. arizona

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miranda Warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say or do can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Such questions include; how he or she knew the victim. This would determine the relationship between the victim and the suspect, if he or she knew the suspect very well, in passing, or if he or she were just an acquaintance. Asking the suspect where he or she was during the time of the crime determines an alibi. After the questioning is completed, based on the answers he or she is either let go or detained until further notice from the…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab Result

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are circumstance’s where the investigator may go directly from an interview to an interrogation occurs when the suspect exhibits a clear indication of wanting to confess during the interview. This could possibly occur early during an interview when the suspect becomes confused, attempting to change his alibi or perhaps when he is asked a question such as “why where your prints located on a piece of paper underneath the body of the deceased victim)?” and the suspect puts his head down and simply shakes his head implying a denial. At any moment an interview can become an interrogation, there are situations where an investigator may go directly from an interview and into an interrogation, or take a pause between the two.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda never knew he did not have to speak with the police was interrogated and confessed and was sentenced to jail. Later an attorney looked over the case and requested Judicial Review Claiming that Ernesto’s rights has been violated. In 1966 The Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s Conviction, and ruled that if a person is going to be taken in as a suspect they must be informed that they do have a right to and attorney. The suspect also has to be informed that the do not have to speak. The supreme court also ruled that if the suspect is not informed of these right the evidence obtained before hand can not be used in court. These rights are now known as the Miranda rights.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Miranda warning (often abbreviated to "Miranda," or "Mirandizing" a suspect) is the name of the formal warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial situation) before they are interrogated, in accordance with the Miranda ruling. Its purpose is to ensure the accused are aware of, and reminded of, these rights under the U.S. Constitution, and that they know they can invoke them at any time during the interview.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If a criminal remains silent throughout the interrogation , the interrogation must stop and a the criminal asks for an attorney , the interrogation must stop until the attorney…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Warning

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Upon the case Miranda vs. Arizona the Supreme Court decided that citizens must be aware of their fifth and sixth Amendment rights upon questioning by the police. Fifth Amendment: “…No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself…” Sixth Amendment: “…In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” The Supreme Court created the Miranda warning that a police officer must read to the suspect before questioning if they wish to have the evidence obtained during the questioning used in the court of law. Miranda warning: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.” If the Miranda Warning was not read to the person in custody before questioning, any evidence obtained from the suspect during the questioning shall be…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Miranda rights in some cases do ensure justice and at times they don’t. They can unsure justice if they were read to the suspect but if not all the evidence they have collected could go out the window. But if they do read your rights they can continue with their investigation and them anything they find can be used against you.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the first class we talked about Miranda Rights. I was surprised to find out that police officers do not always have to read your rights if you get arrested. Police have the right to arrest you under suspicion but police only read you the Miranda Rights only if they start interrogating you. It is not just when they arrest you. I think that I get this notion that we have to be read our rights right after getting arrested stems from pop culture and media.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homicide Detective

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Training required becoming a detective: Like most police officers, homicide detectives must go through a period of training at a police academy or other training institution before they are qualified to work as a police detective. In this training, you would learn things like traffic control, use of firearms, self-defense, first aid and emergency response. You would also be trained in subjects like constitutional law and civil rights. Most detectives begin as patrol officers and work their way up in the police force.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * The most basic process used for information gathering, problem solving, and psychosocial information giving.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Privilege of Silence

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages

    "Miranda warning" originated from a case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1966: an 18-year-old girl was kidnapped and raped, she identified that it was Miranda who did that. The police interrogated Miranda and used his confession as the hearing testimony. After Miranda was convicted he appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the police did not inform him of the right to remain silent, and his confession was concocted under pressure. He said that if he had been told to have a privilege of silence, he would have not made up that confession. After considering all the arguments, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Miranda confession invalid. Because of this jurisprudence, when arresting or interrogating suspects, the police need to say the "Miranda warning" first. This is how the privilege of silence was born in the judicial system.…

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays