As I approach the scene the suspect starts to run and I chase him on foot and I could taze him or shoot him but I shoot him without him being a treat too. Did I do the right thing or did I use excessive forces. The fact in the dilemma is the suspect has committed robbery and he starts to run away from me. I shoot him without him being a treat to me. The moral principle in this dilemma is my integrity as police officer my job is to protect the public from dangers individuals. As be honest with my actions and do the right thing in a situation I encounter. As police officer I need to be fair to the citizens of the community and treat everyone equally. The dilemma is did I acted right by shooting the suspect. The dilemma I might killed the suspected maybe I could say a different scenario of what happen. The result I did the wrong decision of shooting the individuals because I could use a different method to stop him. Based on my ethical formalism I did do the right thing because he was running from the authority. However, another people in the community may think differently because he did not threat against me or aggressive attack me i did the wrong decision of shooting him. Another dilemma is I stop a individual in a traffic stop and the person was suspicious and so I ask him if there was anything in the car that was illegal and he responded no and so I went on with the search and I found 10,000 and illegal substances. Should i report some of the money that i found in the car. The facts in the dilemma is I stop a suspect. The suspects were very suspicious and I search his car to see if he had anything that was illegal. The person had 10,000 and illegal substances in the vehicle. The moral principle is being trustworthy and being honest with my actions. As police officer being fair with others and following the rules is important. The dilemma is I found 10,000
As I approach the scene the suspect starts to run and I chase him on foot and I could taze him or shoot him but I shoot him without him being a treat too. Did I do the right thing or did I use excessive forces. The fact in the dilemma is the suspect has committed robbery and he starts to run away from me. I shoot him without him being a treat to me. The moral principle in this dilemma is my integrity as police officer my job is to protect the public from dangers individuals. As be honest with my actions and do the right thing in a situation I encounter. As police officer I need to be fair to the citizens of the community and treat everyone equally. The dilemma is did I acted right by shooting the suspect. The dilemma I might killed the suspected maybe I could say a different scenario of what happen. The result I did the wrong decision of shooting the individuals because I could use a different method to stop him. Based on my ethical formalism I did do the right thing because he was running from the authority. However, another people in the community may think differently because he did not threat against me or aggressive attack me i did the wrong decision of shooting him. Another dilemma is I stop a individual in a traffic stop and the person was suspicious and so I ask him if there was anything in the car that was illegal and he responded no and so I went on with the search and I found 10,000 and illegal substances. Should i report some of the money that i found in the car. The facts in the dilemma is I stop a suspect. The suspects were very suspicious and I search his car to see if he had anything that was illegal. The person had 10,000 and illegal substances in the vehicle. The moral principle is being trustworthy and being honest with my actions. As police officer being fair with others and following the rules is important. The dilemma is I found 10,000