GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have been a minor but relevant issue since they became popular. They exist almost everywhere in America, but countless people continue to debate whether they should remain. Andrew Pollack’s article “Genetically Engineered Crops Are Safe, Analysis Finds,” for instance, leans toward GMOs. In contrast, Danny Hakim’s “Doubts About the Promised Bounty of Genetically Modified Crops” gravitates against them. While exploring their perspectives of GMOs, the articles most prominently include an obvious audience, strong but contrasting uses of information, and various rhetorical appeals, all of which help demonstrate their purpose.…
“All we want is a simple label for the food that's on our table”. This quote was spoken from a marcher who demands gmos to be labeled for our safety. Gmos are man made plants that still possess unknown effects to our health. In a recent article entitled “labels for gmos foods are a bad idea ” directly oppose people questioning gmos and believing gmos are hazardous. The article tries to persuade the reader into giving a second thought on gmos and think maybe their not so dangerous. Ultimately the articles opinion on gmos being in the food market is that gmos are safe for eating and now ones reported about gmos harming their health. I recognize this article as someone's opinion but i disagree with the idea. Also the article attacks directly…
Colonial development along the eastern seaboard was strongly influenced by the geography of the regions settled and the ethnic makeup of the colonists. Generally, the colonies may be best understood as being divided in the following way: New England (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island), Middle (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware), and Southern (The Carolinas, Georgia, Maryland, Virginia). While these colony groups had many things in common, they also had their own distinctive features. Colonists brought traditions from their home countries and developed new ways of life in North America as they responded to the unique demands of climate, economics, and belief systems. The following is an overview…
Vice’s article titled “GMOs Aren’t That Bad but Monsanto is Worse” rhetorically argues that Monsanto, a horrible agricultural-biotechnology corporation, is improper engineering and is pushing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on North America. Vice’s key point is that not only does Monsanto engineer and push unhealthy, hazardous inorganic seeds and foods on consumers, but manipulatively takes advantage of the market. The use of pictures, links to more information, and conversational language is what makes this article convincing and reasonable yet compelling and concerning.…
(By Laura Daher) 9 3. Body 9 C. Political Causes/Effects (By Lara Henderson) 12 I. Government View 12 II. Political factors of GMO 12 D. Economic Issues (By Lara Henderson) 13 I. Production, Consumption, Costs and Variables 14 II. Business Environment 15 III. Economic Trends 16 E. Psychological Effects (By Rakan Fakhouri)…
Many people look at GMOs with a sort of view as if to ask: Why should I eat new GMO crops, when I could eat a crop that has been around for millennia? What they don’t understand, is that there is really no such thing as a crop that scientists just altered. People have been modifying plants since the creation of agriculture twelve thousand years ago. While it may have been done differently back then, the current method of genetically modifying plants is just a more deliberate way of doing what humankind has always done. The only difference now is that people have a scientific understanding of what they are doing and have improved agricultural techniques; advancements in agriculture have moved from the farm to the lab. The reason that I think so many people are opposed to GMOs, is because they don’t understand what they are, and because they think that scientists are doing something radical in making GMOs; they fear the unknown.”(Chrisopher…
How would you feel if I told you that the food you're eating was made in a science lab? Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are the outcome of a laboratory process where genes from the DNA of one species are extracted and artificially manipulated into the genes of an uncorrelated plant or animal. Crops are often genetically modified to be resistant to pesticides so farmers would be able to spray them without harming the crop itself. However, there are many consequences regarding consumers’ health and environmental problems. Many people question the safety of consuming genetically modified organisms. Companies should acknowledge that their product is genetically modified by placing a label on the product because customers have a right to know. Furthermore, there are several serious health complications that may rise to the consumer. And finally, genetically modifying organisms should be limited by being placed in a controlled environment to prevent contamination with other species because it can be harmful to the environment in several ways.…
Genetically Modified Organisms, also known as GMOs, are “living organisms whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated in a laboratory through genetic engineering,” (The Non-GMO Project). While genetic engineering has the capability of being beneficial to our society, The Non-GMO Project argues that it “creates unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and viral genes that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods,” (The Non-GMO Project). GMOs are very prevalent in our contemporary food industry; The Non-GMO Project website states that “in the U.S., GMOs are in as much as 80% of conventional processed food,” (The Non-GMO Project). New traits are introduced to…
About a year ago, I remember shouting at my husband Henry trying to convince him the difference between GM foods and organic foods. ”No! You just don’t get the concept of GMOS”, I yelled. It was a nice Sunday afternoon, when I and Henry had this big argument on GMO’s, which later on continued the whole day right from the grocery store to the dinner table.…
There is a corporation called Monsanto that owns patents of many GMO seeds in the US. They claim that there foods are harmless and point to studies- many of which the company itself has conducted- demonstrating the safety of the products produced (Monsanto.com, 2015). These studies however have been widely critiqued for obvious bias, and I agree with those assessments. The Monsanto studies only prove that data can be manipulated, not that the products are safe. So, without high quality, objective information, the debate quickly turns into a he said/ she said…
When one tries to prove that GMOs are safe, the other does the same to prove the contrary. However, there is one point that both side agree on and that is that GMOs are already on the American market. Starting from that point we can make our own observations. For instance, if it is true that we have been eating GMOs for the past years then surely we will have been affected by its health risks if there are such risks. The problem is that there has been no symptoms of any sort for the last few years neither for me or anyone in my environment just like was observed by the scientists of the National Academies of Sciences, Mechanics and Medicine (“The Verdict on GMO…” 71). Now I do not claim that GMOs can save us from world hunger, but one thing is sure, they are not dangerous for our health. I do not agree with everything said by the GMOs activists, but I tend to believe them more because the basis of the argument, the safety of GMOs, is most likely to be true. I also tend to believe them more after Lynas’ interview for he witnessed the views of both sides making him, more or less an objective source, and sided with the GMOs activists (“GMOS: A Solution or…” 131-132). Thus, I find myself adopting, the pro-GMOs position for I cannot see any dangers in…
Ninety-two percent of Americans favor labeling genetically Engineered (GE) food because of a lack of knowledge about GMOs (Gay). Consumers Choice Counsel stated that if GMO food is beneficial, then the producers should be willing to have it labeled (Gay). Consumers have the right to know the content of their food, and the circumstances under which it was produced. Bacteria has become resistant to antibiotics, since antibiotics have been added to animal food, and is also used for plant breeding (Gay). Pharma crops, produce made with medicinal drugs, if consumed, could endanger that human’s life. Pharma crops, though beginning with a good intent, have many possible dangerous outcomes. Pharma crops were found growing in soybean fields, because the year before ProdiGene had them there for testing (Gay). Ventria Biosciences planned on moving to Missouri for growing Pharma rice, but a brewery and a food company, besides many rice farmers, opposed it (Gay). Why should the average individual know if their food contains GMOs? Some could possibly have allergic reactions (Gay). StarLink corn was found in food. The EPA had only said it was good for animal food, not human consumption. StarLink, even though the FDA denies it, is believed to cause…
The concern regarding GMOs is understandable. The world is changing and everything humans use and consume have a consequence. However, to assume that GMOs are naturally bad is a naive and uninformed opinion. GMOs are revolutionizing the world and must be allowed an unbiased chance in consumer markets. After all, many of the cures and inventions we take for granted today were surrounded by controversy and paranoia in their early days, similarly to GMOs…
From the Holocaust to bullying, people just watch instead of taking action against the horrible acts that are occurring right in front of their eyes. In looking at the definition of a bystander, the bystander effect, the relationship between bystanders and bullying, and how indifference and fear play a role in the bystander effect, the reasoning and enabling behind bystanders will be revealed through their explanations.…
The two articles I have chosen are both peer-reviewed and have two different opinions about GMO’s. The first article, titled “GMO’s and Global Justice” by Kristian Toft, is against the use of GMO’s, explaining how they are bad for us as human beings and for our environment. Her biggest concern is that we do not know the extent of what these genetically modified foods are doing to our bodies because of the lack of long-term affect testing. When trans-fats were first introduced, corporations battled to get them onto our grocery shelves. It is only decades later that this once novel food has been proven to be extremely unhealthful. This could be a glance into the future of GMO’s. It is similarly a concern that GMO’s in food are causing an increase in allergic reactions. The process of genetically modifying a plant or animal adds new proteins that weren’t indigenous to the original plant or animal, causing an allergic reaction increase when ingested in the human body. Also, some GMO foods have had antibiotic features added to them so they are resistant to certain diseases and viruses. When humans eat them, these antibiotics features persist in our bodies and make actual antibiotic medications less effective. Toft goes on to say that GMO’s are banned in more than 60 countries around the world including, the European Union,…