De Witt’s painting may be one of a church with white walls with brown and gold accents, but he still provides intense and intriguing contrast with his employment of light and shadows bouncing off the pillars and arches. His skill does not go unnoticed here; the shading on the architecture is remarkably accurately portrayed, which is especially impressive because of the sheer number of columns and windows painted. The ground, the perspective the viewer is given with, is well-lit likely because of what appears to be windows beyond the painting’s edges, yet around the church there are many more windows. As expected, just like a photograph, the walls are varying shades of whites and greys, with the lighter spots exactly where the sunlight would have been streaming …show more content…
Again, Interior of the Oude Kerk, Delft focuses on realism and accurately portraying the interior of the church. All the angles appear to be absolutely perfect. Van Gogh, on the other hand, seems to have a bit of fun with the form of his objects. From a first glance, from the perspective the viewer is given, the bedroom is not perfectly square. Rather, the room gives off an almost trapezoid-like shape. The chairs and bed are noticeably warped and the table seems unnaturally tilted as well; unlike de Witt’s straight, perfectly formed and angled lines, van Gogh’s alter the reality quite a bit. Even though it is clear that van Gogh’s painting is that of a bedroom, it is evident that realism was not his goal in