Preview

What Is The Difference Between Locke And Meditations On First Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between Locke And Meditations On First Philosophy
Rene Descartes, John Locke, and David Hume are three of the most fundamental and inspiring philosophers in history. Three very different men, with very different views, all sharing the same goals; to find the true meaning of the ‘self,’ to discover the true definition of what knowledge is, how to obtain knowledge, and the relationship between the body and mind. All three had distinctions in their theories that separated them from each other. Some ideas were shared amongst them, however majority of their individual views conflicted with one another. Descartes was a rationalist and idealist who was known for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”; which was written by him with the objective to omit any false truths he knew to leave only what …show more content…
As previously stated, Descartes is a rationalist and idealist. Descartes main concepts are that knowledge comes from the mind and not the senses, certainty does exist, and that there is indeed a god. Rationalists, such as Plato and Descartes, believe that knowledge comes from using reason, thinking, understanding, and the power of the mind (Descartes, Epistemology Lecture Notes). Idealists believe that we all have knowledge of ideas in the mind. Rationalism has three key concepts, which are innate ideas, reason, and deduction. Descartes did believe that we all started with prior knowledge, known as a priori. Descartes believed that knowledge could be formed simply through experience and deduction. One of Descartes main goal was to eliminate any uncertainty or false beliefs (Meditations on First Philosophy, p.1). In his first meditations, Descartes first step is to eliminate any reliance on the use of his senses because as he states, “.. Occasionally I have found that they have deceived me, and it is unwise to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.” (Meditations on First Philosophy, p.1). After Descartes endures heavy meditation and contemplation he comes to the conclusion that knowledge comes from intellect alone, all truths can be found using intellect and mental reasoning, and knowledge depends on certainty (Meditations on First Philosophy, p.8). Descartes did support the belief of dualism, a distinct separation between the mind and the body; he considered the body simply an extension. Because Descartes was capable and conscious of thoughts he knew his existence was certain (Meditations on First Philosophy, p.2). The phrase highly affiliated with Descartes's “cogito ergo sum” translating to “I think therefore I am”; this phrase is the key concept to Descartes outtake on identity. Descartes certainty regarding the body however was not as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    REVIEW SUMMARY

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issues of resolving legal disputes in international transactions occurs frequently. Many companies involved with international transactions must be enforced in contracts between companies and countries. Just as in the simulation between the U.S. CadMex and Gentura located in Candore had to do. Without this, if a company needs to take legal action against one another then they have to figure out where to resolve this and how to go about it. Making sure that this is in the contract in the first steps will help to resolve legal disputes easier. Also this would be practical for the company to decide on the type of law whether to go with foreign or there homeland. As in the simulation some of the laws were both domestic and foreign. This sometimes can take a while for all parties to agree on, as many of the laws are different in each country.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mood is that of jealousy. The people portray this by talking about Janie and disrespect her until she walks into earshot of them then they put a mask with a smile on…

    • 2233 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes took an extreme skeptical position by asking, “What is impossible to doubt, even when trying to believe that everything is false?” His answer was: "I think, therefore I am"; which is Descartes ' most famous one-liner and is the one that explains his understanding of the dualism argument. The term ‘dualism’ has a variety of uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that, for some particular domain, there are two fundamental kinds or categories of things or principles. In the philosophy of mind, dualism is the theory that the mental and the physical or mind and body are, in some sense, radically different kinds of thing. The main discussion about dualism tends to start from the assumption of the reality of a physical world, and then ways of considering arguments for why the mind cannot be treated as simply part of that physical world. According to substance dualism, our minds and our bodies are two distinct substances capable of existing apart. Descartes substance dualism was based in the belief that the universe consisted of two different kinds of substances that he called res extensa (physical things) and res cogitans (thinking things). In other words, the essence of mind is thought while the essence of body is extension. This belief also leads to his assumption that Free Will is self-evident. In other words, if one is capable of doubting the existence of things learned through experience even when some of these may be true, then it is obvious that we have the freedom to disbelieve, thus free will.…

    • 1952 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Impact of Hydropower Dams on California's Populations of Anadromous Fish: What Can be done to mitigate the Dams Effects and Restore California's Watersheds.…

    • 2767 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes, a French philosopher attempted to craft groundwork to establish further scientific developments. He rationed that once one knows the foundations of a belief and one builds upon that, much of what one believes can be doubted. He held that through using math’s methods, he could apply these same methodologies to other ideas. Descartes believed that nothing can be perceived more easily and evidently than his own mind. By applying his theory, that he knew nothing for certain but was aware of his own thought, he started to combat already instituted ideas and conjured up the existence of…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates once said, “As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it, as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge, while in Empiricism, true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene Descartes, a rationalist, and John Locke, an empiricist, were prime examples of epistemologists who were seen to differentiate greatly within each of their philosophies. However, although Descartes and Locke’s ideas did contrast in that sense, they both shared common concepts that helped mould the basis of their ideas.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    René Descartes did not believe that the truth is known when a theory is formed. He believed that the truth is known after lots of investigation and observation was done regarding the theory. Descartes main belief was that human reasoning is the best way to make new discoveries and understand new things. Descartes wrote a book called Discourse on Method in 1637 in which he stated that he decided not to simply believe traditional authorities. He rather looks for provable knowledge that has evidence.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal, i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real, i.e. physical attributes, or purely subjective, i.e. imaginary traits, the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism, a rival theory, asserts that truth must be established by sensual experience: touch, taste, smell, et al. Rene Descartes, a philosopher and rationalist concluded that one self was merely a continuous awareness of one’s own existence; one’s substance was one’s ability to think. On the other hand, David Hume, an empiricist refuted Descartes conclusion and claimed that the concept of self was nonsense, the idea could not be linked to any sensual experience. Ultimately, Hume concluded that there was no such thing as self, i.e. self does not actually exist and that the concept was an illusion. Overall, Descartes theory of self is more reasonable than Hume’s.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes states that he is certain that he is a thinking think. All thinking beings have ideas. These ideas must have a starting point, a place that these ideas were formed, that these ideas came from. Descartes then continues to explain that although people can be deceived by their senses and their ideas, why would God allow us to be deceived by our senses? For it is this God that has given us these senses and has given us this Earth. If the existence of God is false, then how do we know if we are truly being deceived? This matter of deception is something that Descartes constantly relates back too. He does this in order to provide a starting point so that he can then use deductive reasoning to reach a conclusion. Descartes claims that the cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the idea has objective reality (formal reality meaning what something actually is and objective reality meaning how that something appears to us using our sense). Descartes explains how he, and us, all have an idea of God in our minds. This idea must have come from somewhere. This he explains using deductive reasoning. We have an idea of God, let A represent this idea, and we can say that the actual God can be represented using B. The idea of God (A) must be caused by something, which is at least as perfect or real as the actual God (B). The…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    René Descartes (1596-1650) recognized that this influence of false beliefs could impair his scientific investigations, producing possible false conclusions to his thinking. Therefore, he "realized that it was necessary, once in the course of [my] life, to demolish everything completely and start again right from the foundations if [I] wanted to establish anything at all in the sciences that was stable and likely to last." Descartes began his philosophical career by trying to provide a sound basis for the new scientific method that was being developed, but at the same time he wished to show that this new scientific methodology was consistent with Christianity. It was because of this that Descartes began his Meditations on First Philosophy. Descartes ' overarching goal in the Meditations can be viewed as "a search of a complete system of knowledge, in which [he] would prove the existence of God, understand the nature of the human mind, and establish the principle on which the material universe can be studied."…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes reasons through the idea of whether he is dreaming or not, based off his Criterion of Doubt. Descartes claims that you know something only if you have no reason to doubt it. Descartes beliefs are grounded in a priori truths, and he will not take knowledge from experience into consideration when defining knowledge. Descartes considers that the only thing he can know for sure, is that he exists. Even though he exists as some form of thinking thing, he would still argue that he cannot know whether he has a physical body in which his mind exists.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes First Meditation

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Descartes believes that knowledge comes from within the mind, a single indisputable fact to build on that can be gained through individual reflection. While seeking true knowledge, Descartes writes his Six Meditations. In these meditations, Descartes tries to develop a strong foundation, which all knowledge can be built upon. In the First Meditation, Descartes begins developing this foundation through the method of doubt. He casts doubt upon all his previous beliefs, including "matters which are not entirely certain and indubitable [and] those which appear to be manifestly false." (Descartes, p.75, par.3) Once Descartes clears away all beliefs that can be called into doubt, he can then build a strong base for all true knowledge to stand upon. Descartes attacks all his previous beliefs by going to the root of their origin, the senses and intellect. He then supposes to say that everything he presumed to be absolutely true, such as simple arithmetic, was created by an evil demon.…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke was an empiricist who believed sensory experiences are the ultimate source of all learned concepts and familiarities. As opposed to Descartes, a rationalist and idealist whom believed knowledge is gained in a variety of ways independent of the senses. This idea stemmed off the belief that senses can easily be deceiving and are not trustworthy. According to Descartes, each human being is born with innate understandings that have nothing to do with the senses at all. To prove this he used the sun as an example.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays