Preview

What Is The Difference Between Sparta And Athenian Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
570 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Difference Between Sparta And Athenian Government
In Ancient Greece, the two largest poleis (city-states) Athens and Sparta are evidence of two opposite forms of government. Athens adopted a more democratic approach while Sparta was governed by two kings. Though near each other, Ancient Greece consisted of poleis each of whom was governed separately and differently than one another. In the following I will answer a few questions posed regarding Greece, Sparta and the various city-states.

Athens Early on only men who owned land could hold public office. Later Solon changed the rules dividing the citizens into 4 groups. The two richest could hold office and all citizens sat on the assembly. The assembly elected the officials. Later Cleisthenes changed the rules again and divided Athens’ citizens into 10 tribes. Of these tribes 50 men were chosen to form a council of 500 who served only a one year term and could not be elected to the seat again. The council proposed laws and the assembly reviewed and voted on them.
…show more content…
The Co-kings were members of two different lines of monarchs with each in place as a check to the other. One king oversaw the army and the other oversaw the city-state. Each was chosen by the people and could be selected for either role. Gerousia was comprised of 28 rich elders of 60 years of age or younger and of noble birth and the two kings for a total of 30 men. Their duty was similar to a judicial branch of government. Ephors were quite different as they were comprised of only 5 men who had a lot of power. Their duties included acting as a supreme court, along with overseeing legislative and executive duties. Finally the Demos was comprised of all the people who were male of 30 years of age or less and primarily did electing and convey the people’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This written assignment will address these questions about Athens and Sparta: How did people in Athens and Sparta obtain the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community? Who held public office? What rules governed the selection of public office holders? How…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actual government, the executive body, consisted of two duumviri and two aediles, annually elected by the…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the ages of 800 and 401 BCE, Athens and Sparta were very different in many ways, but in a couple of ways, they were somewhat similar. They both had wealthy aristocrats who controlled their government and who made decisions on what was “best” for their poleis and its people, and both used a political legislative system. While the Spartans had the elder council, called “Gerousia”, the Ephors and the general assembly, the Athenians had the legislative branch, called “Boule”, and the popular assembly. Whereas the Spartan’s general assembly could make laws and the Gerousia and the Ephors could veto them, the Athenians “Boule” could suggest laws, but the popular assembly was responsible for passing legislation into law or vetoing it. Both the Spartan’s general assembly and the Athenian’s popular assembly were made up of free male citizens in their respective city states.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens and Sparta in the ancient Greece world are both revered by many modern civilizations as being foundry influences on modern democracy. The two city states, however, were polar opposites in how they viewed democracy and ran their government. Sparta was known for its military prowess and power, while Athens has always been famed for its progress in the arts and sciences. While both being developmentally different and butting heads sometimes, they both were integral voices on how similar democratic societies ran their governments up until today. The defining differences between the two is that Athens was a heavily class based Democracy, compared to Sparta which was more definable as being an Oligarchy.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Athens was one of the largest Greek city states. (Stockton, 4). It was about one thousand square miles (Stockton, 4). Athens was founded in the 8th century BC (Muller). It was at first ruled by the college of archons. (Muller). After a term of one year, the archons became members of the Council of Elders (Muller). The people had a voice in the popular assembly, the Ekklesia (Muller). However, it did not have real power until 600 BC. By then, it was an established institution of Athens (Muller). It became the central policy making body in the 5th century. There were two main governmental bodies, the Assembly and the Council. (Acropolis). The Assembly was responsible for policy making. (Acropolis) The Council was responsible for administration and implementing the Assembly's policies. Not everyone could participate in Athenian politics. Slaves, resident aliens, and women were excluded.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece was comprised of small city-states, of which Sparta and Athens were two. Athens was renowned as a center of wisdom and learning. The people of Athens were interested in arts, music, and intellectual pursuits. Sparta, on the other hand, was recognized for its military strength. A Spartan's life was centered on the state, because he lived and died to serve the state. Although the competing city-states of Sparta and Athens were individually different as well as governmentally diverse, they both managed to become dominating powers in Ancient Greece.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Athens the people who lived there were divided into three classes: citizens, metics, and salves. Decisions affecting daily living could only be made by citizens who were eligible for democracy, who were male above 18 years. This meant that women, foreigners, and slaves were prohibited from engaging in political activity. Elected representatives occupied the public office. The 500 individuals that made up the Council of Five Hundred, who represented the 10 Attican tribes (50 members each), held legislative authority while the Archons held executive authority.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had a direct democracy which means all citizens voted on laws. There was no leadership position but there was a council, Citizens Assembly and courts. The council was made up of five hundred people, chosen randomly, who proposed laws and served for one year. The citizens assembly was made up of all citizens who voted on laws. The courts were five hundred to two thousand five hundred citizen jurors.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greece 431 B.C.E., the two major cities states at this time are Athens and Sparta. Tensions among these two city states have always been extremely high. Sparta has an exceptional military and Athens has an extraordinary navy. Both of these city states have been competing for control of Greece for many years.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Further reading into the book also disposes the idea through the author’s argument about the burial story in Mark in the following quote “I have argued that Mark created the empty tomb narrative to replace any risen apparition story as the conclusion of the gospel” (pg 16). Professor Crossan’s argument is centered around the story about Joseph of Arimathea’s burial being a tradition or an addition by Mark. Professor Crossan states “Somebody named Joseph of Arimathea could have buried Jesus either out of personal piety or out of communal duty” (Pg. 20). The inconsistencies and lack of sources make it hard to tell one way or the other in regards to the burial story. From a faith perspective, one would need to believe it to be true but form an…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is a land of numerous city-states, called polis. Each polis had its individual government, laws, rulers, and traditions, in spite of the fact that they did have certain things in common such as their language and religion. As a rule, in spite of the fact that, the city-states did not get along. Two of the most famous and powerful city-states were Sparta and Athens. In the event that anybody nowadays were given the opportunity to travel in time to live in one of those two city-states, Sparta should certainly be the one they chose.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The organization and the evolution of the Athenian system of government has overcome many reforms and leaders of government. The many leaders that ruled the political system had various thoughts on the organization and structure of the Athenian framework. These reforms, were a foundation that transformed an aristocratic oligarchy to a government where everyone is eligible members and have the opportunity to have an influence on the political system. The aftermath of the Peloponnesian Wars resulted in unification of the once crumbling Athens, which created a force stronger than ever before. The Athenian people proceeding the war were motivated to alter the political framework, into a system that would overcome the tyranny and crisis…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek Polis

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After this period, the concept of the polis began to change. The regulation of power changed, along with the rights and duties of the people. The Greeks located the source of authority in the polis. Policy was decided in open discussions. In order to be a citizen in the polis, one had to be an adult whose ancestors were Greek and from that particular polis. Children, foreigners, and slaves could not be citizens. Citizens had many exclusive rights, including: the right to vote, own property, and contract legal marriage. The city-states differed in different regions of ancient Greece. Even though the states kept the concept of the polis, the way in which each was governed differed. Two of the most important city-states were Sparta and Athens. Sparta developed as a war-like polis, while Athens developed as a democratic one.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays