Preview

what is the separation of powers and how has it been criticised

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
what is the separation of powers and how has it been criticised
What is the separation of powers and why has it been criticised?

The separation of powers is a theory of government whereby political power is distributed among three branches of government- the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The three branches act both independently and interdependently. This theory has been criticised for a number of reasons.

Firstly, it can place the executive in a position of gridlock when trying to pass legislation. Since, due to the separation of powers, the president is not drawn from the legislature, the president’s party may not have a majority in the legislature. This means that disputes between the Republicans and Democrats can result in the president not being able to pass through legislation, which results in gridlock, and can even cause a government shut down. This occurred in 2013 in which the two main parties disagreed on the way the country’s funding should be spent and obamacare which caused a government shutdown. This is a major problem as it prevents the government from carrying out their manifesto and improving the country.

Also, due to the ambiguity of the US constitution, much interpretation is needed. As a result, there is the possibility that the three branches may have completely different interpretations because each branch would want to interpret in the constitution in a way that benefits their particular branch. This can lead to much conflict between the three branches.

Finally, disagreement between branches gives more power to pressure groups. This is because the separation of powers means that there isn’t usually a party with an overall majority in the legislature so congress is often divided on issues. Pressure groups therefore have a greater influence on political issues as they often influence the way House and Senate members vote by contacting them directly or having strong campaigns.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In order to keep the government from becoming too powerful and endangering the liberty of its people, the framers of the United States' Constitution endorsed the implementation of separation of powers so that the different branches of the government would keep one another in check. In Federalist Paper 51, Madison focused on the crucial relationship between the legislative and executive branches with the use of separation of powers. He stated, "In the republican government the legislative authority, necessarily, predominates. The remedy for this inconvenience is, to divide the legislative into different branches...[and] the weakness of the executive may require, on the other hand, that it should be fortified." While the separation of powers has successfully protected the liberty of America's people, it has also caused a continual struggle between the executive and legislative branch to gain power over matters such as the economy, the right to pass legislation, and control over the military. Due to the prevalence of the legislative power severely limiting the authority of the executive, there is a large imbalance between the demands and expectations pressing in upon the President and his capacity to respond to them. The president cannot get his policies adopted by Congress without long delays and much bargaining. However, some fortification of the executive branch has allowed the president overcome some of these limitations in performing roles such as commander in chief, chief diplomat, and chief legislator.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question of whether divided party control of the American national government is an advantage or disadvantage has long been debated. Many Americans agree with Woodrow Wilson's philosophy, "You cannot compound a successful government out of antagonisms." In other words, a legislative and executive branch controlled by the same political party have a stronger tie and connection and encounters fewer stumbling blocks as they move forward with national policies and issues. There is a sense that divided party control contributes to counter productive law making.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They came up with an idea called checks and balances. James Madison wrote, “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” Checks and balances were created to make sure each branch could check the others and have some involvement in the decisions of the other branches (Doc C). Some examples of the control they have are that, the President can nominate the judges, but the court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. Congress can impeach the President, but the President can veto Congressional legislation (Doc C). This was a success in stopping the dominance of one branch over another, and checks and balances allowed each branch to have a say in final…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison explicates how one person or group withholding all the power is the definition of tyranny and that, “[L]iberty requires the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The excerpt from the United States’ Constitution explain the different powers given to each branch of government. For instance, in Article 1, Section 1 it states, “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…” Moreover, the United States’ Constitution explains, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” Additionally, the Constitution states, “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts….” Separation of Powers helps guard against tyranny because we prevent a singular branch from ruling over the people and have all the power, the very definition of tyranny. By separating the power of each branch it assures that no one branch overpowers…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early years of the United States, the men who began our government had many issues to resolve. The Separation of Powers in the American democracy is where the early government decided to separate the branches of government into three separate areas. The separation was enacted due to keeping the government from having one person in total control and having a tyrannical form of government instead of a democratic form for the people. The writers of the Constitution; or Framers, were the earliest form of government and thought by following the rules and agendas that they had been following for more than 100 years, that the government would be better…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers causes a government to divide a basic government’s power into three branches: Legislative, Executive and Judicial like an organ that shares its responsibilities. Moreover, Checks and Balances is a government structure that gives each branches to control over the actions of the other like the systems of the human body, if there is no respiratory systems, the heart will have to work too hard. In fact, without Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances will not be so powerful. Therefore, like an organ that operate together to create the systems in the human body, Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances works together to make things better for everyone. The systems will not exist without one of the organs, like the government that will not exist without one of the other…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Separation of Powers/Checks and Balances. For much of 2011 and 2012, public dissatisfaction with Congress rose to all time highs, with 70-80% expressing disapproval with how Congress does its job. Many commentators note that Americans are fed up with Washington “grid-lock” that makes government apparently unable to address important problems. Other observers believe that the national government is acting according to its design, based on separation of powers and checks and balances.…

    • 3420 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It does this in a way of dividing and arranging the offices so they can check each other. (Doc C) as stated in The Federalist papers, “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc C) According to the Constitution, each branch of government can check one another. For example, In the legislative branch can approve presidential nominees, override a president's veto, and impeach the president on the executive branch and can also impeach judges on the judicial branch. On the executive branch the president can veto congressional legislation on the legislative branch and can nominate judges on the judicial branch. Lastly, the judicial branch can declare the presidential acts unconstitutional on the executive branch and can declare laws as unconstitutional on the legislative branch. This way the three branches of government are separate but also intertwined between one another to prevent one branch from having too much…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution does not contain a provision explicitly declaring that the powers of the three branches of the federal government be separated. Yet, separation of powers serves various goals. Separation prevents concentration of power and provides each branch with the arson to fight off encroachment by the other two branches. The system of separated powers is designed to maximize freedom.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress and the President

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The framers of the U.S. Constitution created a presidency that must win cooperation from Congress to get the work of government done. Lawmaking and policy-making powers are divided, and the politics of shared power has often been stormy. In general, however, Congress and presidents somehow find ways to collaborate and solve problems.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers is very intrinsic, for the different types of government. In Document 4, the Legislative Branch makes the laws. The Executive Branch carries out and enforces the laws. The Judicial Branch interprets laws and punishes those who break the laws that are enforced. The Separation of Powers is very vital to this country, in ways such the Executive Branch has all of the power, and no one else had any form of control for this country; then this country would be in shambles due to one branch having all of the power. For example,…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eu - Separation of Power?

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The reason why there should be a separation of powers is so that each distinct institution can carry out its function independently and check the other two – a form of checks and balances. The doctrine is opposed to the concentration of state power in a single person or group, since that is a clear threat to democratic government and in the same sense it is important that the legislature is not only a rubber stamp for the executive. Even an independent…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch Essay

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution does indeed provide a system of separation of powers and checks and balances. With this being said, all separated powers are completely and totally equal, all three of them. The three different powers are the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches. The division of power into separate branches of government is central to the idea of the separation of powers. All the branches have their own duties and responsibilities that are a huge impact on our Nation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution implicitly recognises the separation of powers by dealing with each of the three organs of government in separate and distinct provisions. The executive is dealt with in chapter IV, sections 30-56, the legislature in chapter V, sections 57-94 and the judiciary in chapter VI, sections 95-106.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    separation of powers

    • 846 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to a French philosopher Baron de Montesquies separation of powers is defined as the doctrine in which the arms of government (excutive.legislature, judiciary) have separate unique powers which the other branch cannot interfere with (dictionary.com 21 century lexicon copyright (C) 20003-2014 dictionary com.LLC).it is stated that this where designed by the constitution to make sure that no branch will have too much power and that issues of the public policy and welfare would be granted comprehensive attentiveness before taking any action .according to my own point of view separation of powers is the system whereby the three arms of government in Botswana are given spefic functions to carry and may not carry one another s function and each is independent ,thus it has its own separate function. Despite the fact that the branches are not to carry the functions of others ,they are interrelated ,they work together and relieve one another from carrying too much power ,which is stated as one of the check and balances ,where the functions of one branch seem to have and modify the power of another .Also separation of powers is defined as the constitutional principle that limits the powers vested in any person and institution. It divides government authority into three branches : legislative consisting of the president and…

    • 846 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays