Preview

What Led To The Pugachev Rebellion?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Led To The Pugachev Rebellion?
Pugachev Rebellion: Although Catherine scorned violence outside of the battlefield and believed in peaceful ideals, such as prevention over punishment and anti-torture, there was an occasion where she contradicted herself. This occurred when dealing with one of the greatest peasant revolts of Russia. She initially wanted to improve the lives of the lower classes, but later came to the realization that Russia wasn’t ready for those changes yet and doing so would upset the people she relied on most to keep her position on the throne secure, the nobility. They helped place her there and were her biggest supporters; their power was also the greatest potential threat to her authority. The only peasant revolt that was big enough to cause Catherine any worry was the Pugachev Rebellion, led by Yemelian Pugachev, who pretended to be Tsar Peter III. Although he bore absolutely no resemblance to Peter, few peasants knew how Peter looked like and people suspected that the death certificate was fabricated (this is when her lie got back at her). He slowly became a serious threat to her. This was because it was personal due to who he …show more content…
Massie, author of Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman considers Pugachev’s revolt “the most serious challenge to Catherine’s authority during her reign”. This rebellion became a turning point in her rule, as she gave up on freeing the serfs and focused on the nobility, who didn’t try to overthrow her. She was still against serfdom, but realized that a multitude of other changes, including educating the nation, had to be made before Russia was prepared. Although her decision to ignore Pugachev in the early stages allowed for the rebellion to turn into the disaster it was, she redeemed herself in the choices she made after his arrest. She stuck with her ideals against torture and encouraged the nobles to treat their serfs and peasants humanely. Therefore, this crisis is one of the reasons why she deserves the title “the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ch 18 21 22 ap world vocab

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Why significance: even after the death of Pugachev, rebellion continues, but It highlighted the mutual dependence of government and victory for Catherin the Great.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Nicholas, the people suffered from his draconian policies, inciting a series of revolts. The Czar’s significance comes from his role in starting the Russian Revolution, which ended a backwards Russian Empire and created the Soviet Union, a state that influenced the world today. A person today can learn from the Czar’s mistakes and use them in daily life; for example, one can learn to listen to the problems of others before making a major…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    u. Cossacks under Ivan Bolotnikov marched north slaughtering officials and calling for the "true tsar" who would restore justice.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    This was a disastrous move as it left Alexandra in control back in the cities. She had become increasingly under the influence of the one man who seemingly had the power to help her son, Alexis, afflicted by haemophilia. Alexandra believed that Rasputin was a man of God and referred to him as “Our Friend”. Others, appalled at his influence over the tsarina, called him the “Mad Monk” – though not in public unless they wanted to incur the wrath of Alexandra. Rasputin brought huge disrepute on the Romanov’s. His womanising was well known and he was considered by many to be debauched. Rasputin was a great believer in the maintenance of autocracy. 'The growing influence of Gregory Rasputin over the Romanov’s did a great deal to damage the royal family ' - Historian Chris Trueman. Ironically, with the devastation that World War One was to cause in Russia, it was Rasputin who advised Nicholas not to go to war as he had predicted that Russia would be defeated. As his prophecies seemed to be more and more accurate, his influence within Russia increased. Rasputin had always clashed with the Duma. They saw his position within the monarchy as a direct threat to their position. Alexandra responded to their complaints about Rasputin’s power by introducing legislation that further limited their power. 'Rasputin brought huge disrepute on the Romanov’s ' - Historian Chris Trueman.…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific Revolution to the study of human society. One way of doing so was to…

    • 10935 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Grandson of Catherine the Great and son of Paul I, he was influenced by these family members who had different views. Paul I, the son of Peter III and Catherine the Great developed an unstable relationship with his controlling mother who had wrestled the throne away from her husband. She consistently refused Paul any type of leadership role in Russian affairs. Catherine devoted her reign to fulfilling Peter the Great’s prophecies. She made Russia into a country active in the political, economic, and social styles of the rest of Europe, and led it to become a known power in the continent. On the contrary, Paul objected to European views and was disgusted with the French Revolution and everything associated with it, such as the censorship of reading material, fashions, and music.2 This is a rare case where the apple falls quite far from the tree. These varying viewpoints lead him to have both liberal and radical ideas. However, out of these viewpoints, Catherine plays a paramount…

    • 3013 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was Catherine's reforms that led Russia into the age of enlightenment. During the time of her reign, over 1/3 of the population was imprisoned by serfdom or another form of slavery. Her good intentions were hindered by Pugachev's rebellion, the most violent uprising in the history of Russia. Serfs from everywhere joined the former Russian solider in a violent rebellion against the Russian government, demanding an end in serfdom, taxes, and military conscription. Catherine's intention was…

    • 1123 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, she worked hard to bring the sophisticated culture of Western Europe to backward Russia. She imported western architects, sculptures, musicians, and intellectuals. Catherine patronized the philosophies and bought master pieces of western art. When the French government banned the Encyclopedia, she offered to publish it in St. Petersburg. With these countless actions, Catherine won good press in the west for herself and for Russia. Peter the Great westernized the Russian armies, but it was Catherine who westernized the thinking of the Russian nobility. Catherine’s second goal was domestic reform, and she began her reign with sincere and ambitious projects. One major concern of hers was for there to be better laws. Catherine appointed a special legislative commission to prepare a new law code. No new unified code was ever produced, but Catherine did restrict the practice of torture and allowed limited religious toleration. She also attempted to improve education and strengthen the local government. The philosophies applauded her measures and hoped for more to follow. In 1773 a violent and bloody revolt of the serfs occurred. Catherine’s noble-led army was able to end it, but the event was a turning point in the empress’s domestic policy. Catherine had condemned serfdom, but the revolt put an end to any thoughts she may have had of reforming society. The peasants were dangerous and the nobles were her…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why Georgia population was divided over the idea of Independence from Britain was first Georgians felt that they needed protection from the British due they feared any attack from Indians (). Additionally, some of the colonists felt that they may have to separate by Second Provincial Congress that met in Savannah on July 4, 1775(). Georgia role, in the revolution, wasn’t as significant as other colonies due that they were the latter colony of the British and they had the smallest amount colonist. Overall, areas of Georgia like Savannah had a very important role on Spring Hill. However, you have to give awareness to the soldiers from Haiti that held off the British so the Americans can escaped fighting again ().…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peasants Riots

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A successful riot leader was Stenka Razin, who assembled a group of peasants to join him and fight against the Russian nobles to improve their social status. Razin and his followers marched to the fortress at Tsaritsyn and sieged it. After Razin and his men overtook the fortress, they “hung the governor, and distributed all the goods that belonged to the Tsar” to the peasants. Consequently, Razin fulfilled his promise to his followers by giving them all the riches confiscated at the fortress and completed his goal by successfully sieging the corrupt nobles’ fortress. Unlike the success Razin possessed in his revolt, these consequences led to George Vend’s revolt. After his riot, the German government imprisoned him, tortured him, and dishonored his whole family. George Vend’s wife Christina stated that the government, “banished her and her children innocent children from their manor, and forbade anyone in the community to provide shelter for her and her children” because of the actions of her husband. Furthermore, the government punished George Vend and his family and anyone who aided them because the German government wanted to set an example of what happens when someone riots against the government. Even though consequences followed Vend’s and Razin’s actions if they failed, they both knew their actions were necessary if the peasants wanted to improve their social…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays