Preview

What Led Up To The Civil War?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Led Up To The Civil War?
The events of the Civil War and what led up to it, plus the outcome of the war during the Reconstruction, formed American history. This whole period of time took place from the 1830s all the way to 1872, and everything that happened helped the events that happened afterwards too. The Civil War did help America rid itself of slavery, but also birthed a new monster called segregation, which isn’t equally as bad as slavery, but it wasn’t good either. Sadly, these 40ish years were some of the most fundamental in proving that America wasn’t going to die out so easily. The first thing before the South’s secession was the slave resistance and abolitionists in the North. Some of the ways slaves rebelled against the conditions they were subjected to …show more content…
Some people believed that violence was not the answer, but slavery had to end. The people who believed slavery had to end were called abolitionists. They were primarily in the North, and used newspapers and churches to make their point known. They called slavery a crime against God and criticized the government for allowing it to be legal. How, they asked, could America be the land of the free, if not everybody was free? An abolitionist named John Brown took it another step further. He led the Harpers Ferry Raid, which greatly increased the tension between the North and the South. His actions made him a hero in the North, and a villain in the South. Some abolitionists were once enslaved people. Harriet Tubman was one of these freed African Americans. When she was 30, she ran away to the free state of Pennsylvania. Even though she could’ve been safe there, she risked her life to get other slaves to freedom through the Underground Railroad. The Underground Railroad refers to the routes that escaped slaves would take to get to freedom. Harriet Tubman was a ‘conductor’ of the Underground Railroad, meaning she would ferry people to …show more content…
He could never become one. This decision applies to all African Americans. They also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. This decision led to the election of Abraham Lincoln, which directly led to the South succeeding. The North’s advantage in the Civil War was that it had a massive population of 22 million. It had more food crop farms for feeding soldiers. It was more connected through it’s 21 thousand miles of railroad tracks. The weakness of the North was that it’s military leadership wasn’t as good as the South. Whereas in the South, its strength was that it had great military leadership. It also has the strength of it’s sheer size. It’s weaknesses were that it’s agricultural economy was not fit for sustaining a long war. It also didn’t have as many food crop farms as the North had. Plus, it had the distinct disadvantage that if the Union gained control over the Mississippi River, the Confederacy would be divided into two pieces. The Union realized this, and eventually the Battle of Vicksburg was fought. When the Union won, they gained control over the Mississippi River, successfully dividing the Confederacy into two

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The union was more industrialized and better equipped to make products that were made of iron like railroads and ships which was a big advantage for the north. The union could easily transport goods and soldiers compared to the confederacy. The confederacy had a hard time to feed and clothe their soldiers because they little railroads. The north had another advantage…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Union certainly had considerable advantages. There were 22 million people in the North compared with only 9 million in the South (of whom only 5.5 million were whites). The North had a much greater industrial capacity. In 1860 Northern states produced 97 per cent of the USA’s firearms and 94 per cent of its pig iron. Even in agriculture the North enjoyed an edge. The Confederacy hoped to make good its lack of materials by trading with Europe, but the Union used its naval strength to impose an increasingly tight blockade. The Union was further aided by the fact that four slave states – Delaware, Missouri, Maryland and Kentucky – remained loyal to the Union. Nor were all the people within the 11 Confederate states committed to the Confederate cause. Pockets of Unionism existed, especially in the Appalachian Mountains. Slaves were also a potential fifth column. Throughout the war there was a steady flow of blacks fleeing to Union armies. The North converted first their labour and eventually their military manpower into a Union asset.…

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some disadvantages the Union had is they had trouble getting volunteers and they were unfamiliar with the land because they had to go into the South. The Confederate advantages were that they had excellent military leadership and they were fighting in their own land. According to ushistory.org, “The South also had a great nucleus of trained soldiers.” This…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many ways people responded to the struggle for freedom, but two ways they tried to have freedom were by escaping their owners or by trying to get an education. Slaves were sick of the brutal punishments, abuse, and endless hours of hard labor; this led to slaves retaliating and running away…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had certain advantages over the Confederacy that were a greater help than the South such as banking, factories and ships. They had more railroads to move supplies, men and equipment. This was a big advantage because…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These strengths included the Southern military tradition, the lack of urbanisation in the South and the physical vastness of the Confederacy. The Southern military tradition meant that the Confederate army had many professional officers, as well as the Southern militias providing many well-trained men. The lack of urbanisation in the South caused Richmond and New Orleans to be the two main targets. This was advantageous for the Confederacy because New Orleans was on the southern coast, leading to the physical vastness of the CSA aiding its defences. This links to the changing nature of warfare, because the strengths of the CSA were better fitted to the old style of warfare of decisive battle and so the North took four years to win whilst they had not turned to the strategy of war of attrition under Grant. This factor is the least important out of the four, because the strengths of the USA outweighed the strengths of the CSA.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One person who helped the abolitionist movement was Frederick Douglass. Frederick Douglass was born into a slave family on February 18. Although he did not know the exact date he was born, he decided to celebrate…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For starters, they didn't Industrialize, as simple as that. The North had five times the number of factories the South had (Historycentral.com, par 2), so the South depended nearly completely on other countries for their 'finished goods' and for their income, from the crops they sold. Also, they did not build many train tracks, less than half the tracks the North had, and these tracks were run down and neglected. So, when the North took the ports and the water ways, they took most of the South's transportation. Since the South thought they didn't need to industrialize, they brought about their own downfall and the loss of the war.…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the south it was nearly impossible to win the war . The north had many advantageson the south, which created a large difference in the outcome of the Civil War. The North had a bigger population, better leadership, and Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was a leader of the union, and led them to many great victories with his decision making on generals to lead the Union. The north had many plans to shut down the south, though they often took longer than what was expected of them, so many of them were stopped by generals or were figured out by the south.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War was a brutal war between the North and South of America over the issue of America of slavery, which was spurred on by the secession of the southern states from the Union . The North fighting for freedom and preventing the South from seceding the country. while the South was fighting to keep slave labor. After the Union won the war, that’s when America started to change, I’m going to explain how the Civil War prized America as the land of opportunity, made America more advanced in technology, and gave everyone, no matter of race, to be free. "The Civil War paved the way for Americans to live, learn and move about in ways that had seemed all but unthinkable just a few years earlier.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quite simply, the North had large amounts of just about everything that the South did not, boasting resources that the Confederacy had even no means of attaining (See Appendices, Brinkley et al. 415). Sheer manpower ratios were unbelievably one-sided, with only nine of the nation's 31 million inhabitants residing in the seceding states (Angle 7). The Union also had large amounts of land available for growing food crops which served the dual purpose of providing food for its hungry soldiers and money for its ever-growing industries. The South, on the other hand, devoted most of what arable land it had exclusively to its main cash crop: cotton (Catton, The Coming Fury 38). Raw materials were almost entirely concentrated in Northern mines and refining industries.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Union and the Confederacy have their advantages and disadvantages. The Union had banking, factories, and ships. They also had more railroads to move supplies and men than the South did. A huge advantage of the North was their large Navy and their experienced government. Abraham Lincoln was clearly committed…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil War: Advantages and Disadvantages Since the beginning we see that the North outweighed the South’s chances of winning the Civil War of 1861 through 1865. Through the war between the South and North did had advantages and disadvantages the North in the end was of course victorious. Examples of the North advantages were manufacturing capabilities, larger population, and a vast railroad system Manufacturing capabilities of the North were made possible due to the fact that the North was going through an industrial revolution during that time. Though due to the revolution the North had mass production on goods and weapons that were supplied quickly to their growing army.…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abolitionist movement was fought to end slavery. A diverse line had been drawn between free and slave stares. Northerners began to think of slavery was a contradiction to the free work that developed and saw the south as backward. Individuals like William Garrison called for uncompensated abolition of slaves. He also allied with other abolitionists. Tensions between north and south increased because of the movement.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abolition Movement

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Abolition Movement started until William Lloyd Garrison started his crusades. “In December 1833, the three most active antislavery organizations, the Philadelphia Quakers, the New England Garrisonians, and the New York Reformers, met with freed blacks to reform an organization called the America Anti-Slavery Society.” Abolitionists started to focus on church members and clergymen because that way they could talk to the white American people and make them realize and change their attitude towards slavery. Garrison wanted to free all slaves and get rid of slavery but not only that, he also wanted for blacks to receive the same political and economic rights as all whites received. Many Northerners accepted the fact of eliminating slavery but did not agree with giving them equal rights as the whites. In order for the abolitionist to reach their goal, they knew they had to get many northerners to join the cause. By the 19th century, the institution in the north was almost gone, but remained strong in the south because they depended on slave labor. As numbers of members grew in the north, it slowly disappeared in the south. “Southern state legislatures banned antislavery material.” “By the late 1830s, there were no known abolitionists in the south, and northern abolitionists were seen committing acts of violence against the south.” An abolitionist called John Brown wanted to purchase some land in Virginia, that way the escaping slaves could have a place to go and stay. In order to do this, he had to acquire some arms, so he with other men decided to attack a southern fort called Harpers…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays