Preview

What Liberties Does He Believe Americans Are Willing To Sacrifice?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Liberties Does He Believe Americans Are Willing To Sacrifice?
2. What "liberties" does he believe Americans are willing to sacrifice? Siegfried believes Americans were willing to sacrifice both their political and personal liberties in the name of mass production and mass civilization. Americans weren’t necessarily sacrificing their rights like the freedom of speech or religion—their obsession with efficiency of production was obstructing their personal liberties. In order to meet the production quota, Americans were willing to sacrifice pride in and quality of their work, personal values and accomplishments, and the sense of individuality all in the name of consumerism and material comfort. Because of this obsession, Americans were also sacrificing their political liberties because they were not fighting …show more content…
However, I am very well aware that there is a chance that I could, unknowingly, sacrifice a liberty without fully realizing it. I always liked to believe that I am the type of person who won’t willingly conform to something, but I will never really know if this is truly the case. As Siegfried observed in the early 1900s, American citizens were throwing away their personal liberties because society stated that one thing—the standard of living—was sacred above all else. While this wasn’t necessarily true, many of Americans blindly accepted this “fact” and did whatever they could to obtain a position where they were deemed successful by society. This goes to show that people can and do sacrifice liberties without consciously realizing it, which is common in conformity. Now, I can say right now that I will not conform to anything, but this is likely not the case for I have already done so in the past. In middle and high school, I dressed a certain way or bought certain things to try to fit in, or rather, to conform. While it thankfully did not get to the point where I had to sacrifice liberties, who is to say that it won’t happen to me in the future? I feel that when people sacrifice liberties, they aren’t really aware of what it is they are doing or what exactly they’re conforming to, which is why I, at some point in my life, may end up sacrificing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the first section, he identifies and critically examines important “rhetorical frameworks” that have been artificialized in the public: America as the greatest nation on earth, supporting the troops, and patriotism. The first framework that he discusses is something that has been brought up in our class as well, which is American exceptionalism. When approaching this topic, Jensen looks at what defines a nation’s “greatness.” He proposes that if it were history or the ability to correct mistakes that made a nation great, then America fails both. First, its history shows bloodshed throughout centuries like the almost complete elimination of the Natives in the nineteenth century, and second, it lacks the ability to acknowledge the wrongful ways that wealth has been acquired within its systems including the cheating of the reservation land to create casino revenue. The second framework Jensen introduces is the “support the troops,” more implicitly, “support the war.” The demonstrate this point, Jensen describes a personal anecdote about a past student of his who had to give up education to serve in the army. She could not express her reservations about her situation, according to Jensen, and had to perform her legal obligation. Jensen then asks the reader whether he too should have kept his objections to himself and shown support for her even if his beliefs told him otherwise. This story drives the argument that there is an unspoken rule that requires citizens to show support of troops. I believe this system is dismantling a democratic society like Jensen said because it discourages free expression of dissent. Lastly, the third framework Jensen introduces is “patriotism,” especially the kind that arose after 9/11 in forms of public-service television ads. Jensen also gives examples of the different forms of patriotism that he has seen in the public during the U.S. attacks on…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and to not be under…

    • 573 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no on else; hence the exercise of the natural right of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our daily life, we have to put up with rules, judgemental people and drama. Most of us stay within those imaginary lines to be okay. We accept the things that people tell us and change in order to fit into society. Although you can not see it, it is common for us to try to fit in. We do it in order to not get bullied or judged. Being a person who follows the idea of conformity can be led to the idea of you being a, “goodie two shoes”. Unlike a non-conformist, they can be more of an out-going person. Although I am against the idea of being a full conformist, I can not say that I do not follow it. In order to stay out of trouble or harms way, it can lead for you to end up following the rules.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grape 2

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This quote has a certain measure of truth in it because people do want to be safe and to have a good measure of safety; they give up the freedom of taking risks. For example, the appointment and execution of laws considerably the freedom of civilians but, if a poll is conducted to remove any such laws then most people would vote against it. This is for the plain reason that, strict laws and the police or army which enforce them, bring about safety in society for the masses. For this sense of safety society is ready to give up some measure of freedom. Even our own parents choose our safety over freedom. They would be much happier if we have stricter bazaar rules and if the Woodstock campus is more compact, because that way, even though our freedom is slightly curbed we are much safer. A very good example of safety over freedom is that of the army, navy and the air force. Their lives are all about safety, safety of their country, safety of their region, their comrades and at last their own safety. To gain this safety they have to be extremely disciplined and give up a lot of freedom, they have to give up the freedom to decide the schedule of their day, what they want to do while they serve, what they want to wear and they do not even have the freedom to decide their own haircut. They do this for the safety of the masses, hence providing for the best example thus far of safety over freedom.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conformity is something that happens daily in our social worlds. Although we are sometimes aware of our behaviour, in many cases we conform without being very aware that we are doing so. Sometimes we go along with things that we don’t agree with or we behave in a way that…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another similar quote that Elbert Hubbard wrote is “Responsibility is the price of freedom.” He is saying that freedom comes with responsibility. Freedom is the best thing anyone could have, but you also must bear the burden of responsibility for your words and actions. The first amendment is the best because you can be responsible for…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The right to swing my fist ends where the other man’s nose begins.” said Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the former justice of the American Supreme Court. This famous analogy articulates the scope of liberty suggested by John Stuart Mill and his ‘one very simple principle.’ As the very basis to support his arguments about liberty and its limit, the principle strenuously insists as follows. The only justification for exercising coercive force over an individual is when his actions would otherwise harm any other individual. This Harm Principle or so-called Mill’s Liberty Principle has been implemented to judge whether the state, in a particular situation, is rightfully authorized to interfere with the individual’s free choice and action. Even though…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rachel Ek

    • 781 Words
    • 2 Pages

    That example shows my logical viewpoint, but the nuances of not conforming are not as black and white as being logical or emotional. Everyone conforms to a certain degree; if they do not, they are disciplined or out-casted. For example, I often am referred to as a “nerd.” Even though nerds are often quite successful in their endeavors, the connotation is a derogatory one. The flippant whispers of “nerd” that stream my way after I receive a higher grade are reminders that I am not one of them. For studying and trying on the assignment, I am ridiculed.…

    • 781 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual must always question the motives of authority, especially when it demands the resignation of your natural rights. By giving up your natural rights, you are simply facilitating a regime’s potential to become oppressive. Therefore, when natural rights cease to exist an individual is subjected into a state of vulnerability because their value within society is jeopardized. A human being no longer possesses the power to determine their own worth, instead the authoritative regime dictates your worth on the basis of beneficial one can be within society.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The main theme throughout, On Liberty, is the idea that without a strong will to actively cultivate vital individuality, a society will cease to progress.1 The overall well being of a nation-state lies within the citizens’ willingness to promote individuality. Promotion of individuality increases a person’s worth making him a more valuable member of society; so, the more valuable a member of society he becomes, the more likely he is to make positive contributions to the nation-state. Dissenters are an example of those individuals who actively cultivate vital individuality.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In On liberty, Mill claims that individuals are pressured to obey the customs, beliefs, norms, opinions and attitudes accepted by the majority. Mill believes that individuals should strive hard and take positive measures to ensure that their liberties are not destroyed. He effectively presents the threat of the government which destroys the freedom of individuals, especially those who try to evade what they dictate, through the use of coercion by force and imprisonment. However, John Mill overstates the threats of the “Tyranny of Majority” and understates the consequences of the government.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    freedom

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Every choice and decision we make is affected by something. It could be from laws and rules or something we have heard or seen in our lives; whether an advertisement on television or something a friend said. Everyone we see and everything we hear has a domino affect on all our choices we make in life. It’s as if we have imprisoned ourselves. Mr. Spence argues that “perfect freedom demands a perfect vision of reality and total awareness of our being.” This raw, absolute condition of existence sends humans looking for shackles. He continues by providing four examples where we willingly give up our freedom: The fear of death becomes the desire for the boundaries of religion to address our existential needs. The fear of loneliness pushes us to imprison ourselves in relationships by limiting our freedom through commitment and the emotional risks of caring for each other. The fear of want drives us into the lifetime bondage of employment so we can collect a paycheck. The fear of rejection tempts us to conform to the rules of society, whether we agree with those rules or not. Freedom, as defined by Mr. Spence, requires great courage and a willingness to move beyond the beliefs of society in order to escape the “tyranny of convention.”…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Happy People

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The earliest American definition of liberty—stated frequently by the Founding Fathers—is about constraints on personal actions: if I don’t hurt anybody else, I should be free to pursue my own will. As Thomas Jefferson put it in his first inaugural address, “A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.” Despite more recent attempts to expand our understanding of freedom to include claims on one another or on government—FDR’s 1941 State of the Union speech, for example, which mentioned “freedom from want”—about two-thirds of Americans still define freedom in terms of doing what they want, being able to make their own choices, or having liberty in speech and religion.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Is What I Do

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Remember that time in class when you thought you had the right answer but changed it because a majority of the class thought different, or that time you made fun of the nerdy kid in your class because it was considered the cool thing to do? Their might have been no problems at the time but when you found out your answer was the correct one and you got in trouble for picking on the nerdy kid, the majority of us would find ourselves saying "everyone else was doing it". The main reason for conforming is the guarantee that you will never be left alone. It is so often that people commit wrong acts, then when accused, they retreat into the numbers of those involved.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays