Preview

What Makes Alexander The Great Military

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Makes Alexander The Great Military
Philip II, Alexander’s father was known for his innovations with the Macedonian military, Alexander perfected the formations and tactics developed by his father. Utilization of siege machinery enabled Alexander to surpass his father’s achievements and conquer the East. These technologies together with his great mind of military strategies enabled him to become one of the greatest military leaders in history.

Introduction Philip II laid the foundation for Alexander’s great success in his campaign to take the East. Philip II instilled in his son the need for a strong, loyal army with many supporting units, especially siege engineers. Alexander built upon his father’s ideas, creating an army that worked harmounously together conquering every
…show more content…
This would allow the invading army to attack the defending forces on the wall, and eventually gain access to the top of the wall. The siege towers could either be built next to the wall or be built with wheels and moved into position at the time they were needed. Some of them included battering-rams on the ground floor, so that while the troops at the tops of the tower were attacking the defenders on top of the wall, the battering-rams could be used to break down the city gates. Arrow-firing catapults could also be installed on the top of the tower and be utilized to attack the defenders at the wall. Once the city walls were breached the siege towers could then be wheeled inside the city and used for futher attacks upon city rooftops.

Catapults Torsion catapults are believed to have been invented by the Phonecians. There were two varieties of them, mainly differentiated by size, the light and the heavy. The light catapult was utilized to hurl small projectiles, such as arrows, small rocks, and javalines. The larger, heavier catapult could throw stones up to 60 pounds. The mechanism that propelled the projectile was usually tightly twisted animal sinew or human hair and had a range of about 450 meters with an eight pound projectile. Although these were utilized by Alexander in many of his battles they were considered to be rather

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The phalanx was tight lines of men who could travel together, almost like a tank. The soldiers were given more compact shields that strapped to their arms. This allowed the formation to be even tighter and more stable. The soldiers were also equipped with spears and stabbing swords. The extra long spears allowed several ranks and lines of men to participate in the battle and decrease strain of the front line. The long spears also allowed for large scale attacks without enduring any severe losses. The big weapon of his army was also the cavalry. The army also had a large supply of horses, and men that man the horses and can fight on foot. In the phalanx, the men of high military expertise, the lochage, was in the front. The soldiers in front and rear would be the strongest soldiers. The phalanx offered impenetrable defense and was well fitted to wear down the enemy line (cite). The effectiveness of the phalanx was demonstrated through the fact that the army would beat enemies even when outnumbered. The phalanx provided a confident tight formation of soldiers surrounded by peers, and a wall of long spears.In addition to the phalanx, the army would have the calvary going into battlefield, flanking the opponents. Alexander reformed the phalanx. He made a way to increase mobility. His reform made it so the archers and javelin men could deploy into intervals and discharge their missiles, and then closing up again in order…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His country was in danger and he felt threatened to take action. He gained power by uniting his country which is a key factor that distinguishes him from Alexander III. With an already united country and several tactics in place, Alexander seemed to have all of the hard work already done for him. Even though Philip lost several battles and did not expand his sieges outside Greece, he is still considered a great warrior and leader. What made him great wasn 't the amount of land he conquered; it wasn 't a never lose personality and record; it was the effect he had on his nation and the unification of his people. How can you not admire someone who brought a nation of farmers and sheep herders and turned them into one of the most dangerous and successful militia in the entire world in only two decades? (5). Without these developments, Alexander 's crusades and accomplishments would not have been…

    • 2377 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The men would be organized in large units, capable of fending off attacks with the length of their spears and the density of their deployments. There light armor meant that the cost to a Macedonian of serving in the phalanx was very low, which allowed for a far greater percentage of the population to serve than if the army was still organized around hoplites. Philip also organized the first “shock calvary” of the ancient world, armed with a long calvary pike called a sarissa that allowed them to charge infantry formations and break them. These two formations allowed for a hammer-and-anvil combined arms approach, with the phalanxes used to either bait the enemy into spreading themselves out, or to fix the formation in place (“anvil’), which would then allow the heavy calvary to shatter the formation (“hammer”). Borza also notes that Philip created a corps of engineers to develop new siege engines, which Alexander used to crack the cities of the Persian empire.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander had plans to unite Greece and conquer Persia. He knew it was best to do this, so he tried every play in the book to conquer Persia and surrounding empires. He was skilled in military tactics and battle strategies. His knowledge of good military attacks led him to many conquered empires such as Thebes, Egypt, and eventually, Persia.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander was born in 356 BC in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia. He was son of Philip II, King of Macedonia, and Olympias, the princess of neighbouring Epirus. He spent his childhood watching his father transforming Macedonia into a great military power, winning victory after victory on the battlefields throughout the Balkans. When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years of Alexander’s life Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature which stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life. In 340 B.C., when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 year old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, which shows that even at such young age Alexander was recognized as quite capable.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the west, another empire was taking root, King Philip, Alexander’s father conquered Macedonia in 338 BCE and unified the warring states of Greece. His next goal was to conquer the world as far as Persia in the east but did not live to accomplish this feat. His son Alexander vowed to finish what his father could not do and at a young age of 22 years he conquered Persia, then went on to conquer Egypt and reached as far as the Indus Valley. His empire though vast did not endure after his death because unlike the Dynasties of China, Alexander’s insatiable desire for more territory, lead to a need for more soldiers that drained Greece form her military and dispersed her men throughout the vast empire of the east, eventually making it difficult for Greece to defend itself later from a roman…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand Alexander the Great was not so great because many tactics where inherited from his father,Philip II. Alexander's father had many tactics such as the phalanx, however Alexander decided to improve on his father's idea and make it better and stronger so he could defeat more enemies. The phalanx was his fathers idea but improving on the idea shows that he was intelligent and skilful. This shows that…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great like most heroes in history have traits that makes it possible for him to be able to do great things. Alexander of Macedonia was a 20 year old leader who got his empire from passed down from family, Macedonia and city-states in Greece. Alexander decided to attempt to conquer the entire Persian Empire, from Egypt to India, In this process he did things historians question made him great or not. Alexander the Great was great because of his intelligence, empathy for others and leadership.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At only 32 years old, Alexander had created the largest empire the world had seen. He conquered land ranging from Greece to Egypt, and from Egypt to Asia and Persia. At just 20 years old, Alexander received the throne from Philip. Soon after, he began to build his empire. Alexander was very proud of his accomplishments, as one would expect. After defeating his close friend Dareius in battle, Alexander boasted, “What, pray? Dost thou not think that we are already victorious, now that we are relieved from wandering a vast and desolate country in pursuit of a Dareius who avoids battle?” (Plutarch…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great is recognized as one of the greatest commanders that world has ever seen, if not the greatest. Alexander first led troops as a mere teenager and became king afterwards due to the assassination of his father. He decided to expand the Greek Empire, which his dad, King Philip, started but couldn't finish. At just the age of twenty years old, he set…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Son of Phillip II, Alexander the Great is considered one of the greatest military commanders of all times. Alexander grew up watching his father Phillip II transforming Macedonia into a great military power. After his father Phillip II was killed by a bodyguard, he became king of Macedonia to then become Alexander the Great. Alexander employ the latest technology to conquer civilizations, such as the catapult and the serge tower. His intelligence and the way he commanded his military made him the most powerful man in the world. Macedonians were considered inferior to other city-states. Alexander the great wanted to achieve his father ambitions, he wanted to be Greece, seize Macedonia, and he wanted to invade the Persian Empire. He transformed…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question Number Three: Who was Alexander the Great and why was he “Great”? Macedonia was a barbaric nation that thrived under King Philip's reign. Located to the North of Greece, Macedonia was at a prime location for mass domination over Europe, but the prowess of the nation needed to be erected by a great and powerful ruler. This ruler would be Alexander, the son of King Philip, born in 356 BC. King Philip believed that Alexander was the son of a God, and that his presence was both human and divine.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Path

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the final years of Alexander’s father; Phillip the second was assassinated as King of Macedonia in the year of 336 B.C.E. (Reword this sentence a bit. During Alexander’s final teen years?) Alexander then took his place as King, and researched interests of science, and philosophy; educated by Aristotle. At the age of nineteen, Alexander first restored the Macedonian rule in Thessaly, and defeated the Thracians in the year of 335 B.C.E. After the first rulings of the western land, Alexander then turned to the Illyrians where he ravaged and ruled and became prime (do you mean that he demonstrated his stron military leadership?) Make sure that you use the sources as your voice. Again, this is one of those papers where your focus is on what you are learning from the primary sources that you read) in military leadership. As Greek lands became overruled during Alexander’s teenage years, Greek civilization turned to Alexander’s control. After the final fight in Thebes, Alexander became victorious, gained power and became a powerful leader to lead his military southward, where the turning point of his conquest began.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history the actions, beliefs, and achievements of certain individuals have changed global history. One such individual is Alexander of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great. During the years of Aristotle came the military rule of Philip of Macedonia. Philip was a great conqueror, but not as great or as popular as his son Alexander. The main thrust of Alexander's reign was that it happened so quickly. With lightning fast speed, the greatest mortal hero of Greece conquered the entire known world. Those conquests would restructure the world order and unite East and West as a cohesive whole in a way beyond what anyone had, up to that point, dreamed of. While the immediate effects of Alexander's life may have seemed mind-boggling to those who lived in his time, the long-term changes wrought by this one man who strove to be a god are even more remarkable.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catapult History

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term catapult came from the Greek word “katapultos” and is defined as a large machine placed on wheels that has a basket on a long wooden throwing arm and some type of force to hurl the objects (Catapult history). Catapults were first used in Asia to increase the range and power of a crossbow that was used in war as a weapon. Diodorus Siculus, was the first to show the use of a mechanical arrow firing catapult 399 BC (History) that was much like a crossbow and called a Gastraphete (Catapult history). This Gastraphete was later made into a bigger version known as the Ballista (Catapult history). Catapults were then brought to Europe when used during the Siege of Dover in 1216 by the French.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays