This essay will analyse in detail the crucial role that coal played in spreading and sustaining the industrial revolution before 1900, and will also discuss whether it was theoretically possible for the revolution to have survived without.
Many historians believe that the industrial revolution was a natural progression from the earlier agricultural revolution of the mid-eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The agricultural revolution had spread to Britain from the Netherlands, which increased food production substantially. It is estimated that between 1750 and 1800, agricultural productivity in Britain increased by twenty-six per cent, compared to a mere four per cent increase in France within the same period. It also lessened the economical reliance on farming and agriculture. In turn, this allowed many labourers to escape the so-called ‘Malthusian Trap’, and freed up workers to work in the developing mines and newly-forming factories. This also provided a significant amount of the funding needed to finance the initially expensive process of industrialisation. With substantially more available workers, an increased value of British agriculture, and enough food to comfortably feed the increasing population, it is easy to see why historians generally agree that the agricultural revolution ‘helped to power the industrialisation process through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.’