Preview

What Role Did Socrates Play in Ancient Greece?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Role Did Socrates Play in Ancient Greece?
| What Role Did Socrates Play in Ancient Greece? | Natalia Gonzalez | | Mr. Pellegrini, 2A | 3/24/2010 |

[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] |

What Role Did Socrates Play in Ancient Greece?

In the leading city of Athens 2,500 years ago during the Golden Age, a peculiar philosopher was born into the reign of Pericles. Socrates went against common religion, influenced social roles and people, and was the founder of the Socratic Method. Religious opinions affected Socrates’ life a great deal. Whereas most Athenians observed polytheism and believed in gods such as Poseidon and Hades, Socrates believed there was only one god responsible. Interestingly enough, when asked, Socrates could not put a name to this god or give an explanation. The most he could say was that the god spoke in his mind and gave him advice, like a conscience. He called this his daemon. Conversely, in a world where many things, such as thunder, were scientifically unexplainable, people were very attracted to religion as justification. Socrates on the other hand, stated that clouds created thunder and lightning rather than Zeus. Such statements more than likely came from Socrates’ younger years when he was a student of Anaxagoras. While studying Anaxagoras’ work, Socrates learned that the Selene, the goddess of the moon, was not real and that the moon had hills and valleys and shone with reflected light. Of the sun, Socrates gathered additionally that Apollo was not real, and that the sun was a very hot rock. This not only shaped Socrates’ religious life but also affected the way he interacted with people and changed their perceptions. Socrates offended people by daring to mention that he did not believe the god, Apollo. This dilemma was created when Chaerephon, one of Socrates’ students went to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]…

    • 809 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates official formal accusation was in 399 BCE, he was brought in to the jury by Meletus a man that was embarrassed while being interrogated by Socrates. Meletus reasoning for Socrates formal accusation was the he was charged for not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, introducing others, new divinities and corrupting the youth (The Apology).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous charges against Socrates in the reading of The Apology. The basic charges against him include impiety, corrupting the youth, and theorizing about unknown topics. He does not believe in the gods that the state does, and therefore seeks for natural explanations to processes that occur in the world around him. He did not recognize the gods and introduced other new divinities. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth. Due to the constant asking of questions and inquiry, it lead him to try to discover new things about life. Since he looked for natural reason, he began to teach others about his understandings. His followers soon began to imitate his methods and expose other people as unwise which was a threat to the order…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Was Socrates Guilty

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    In fact, Socrates was not guilty of the crimes that he was imputed to him. Socrates' contempt for religion was what led to his condemnation and that the other charge that was imputed to him, the political accusation, only served to convince the undecided people.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro Vs Plato

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates’s initial intension was to tap from the repertoire of the assumed and over – estimated knowledge of Euthyphro, as part of his defense. The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro was based on the role of the deities and justice in the man’s actions as Euthyphro presented himself as man of great religious knowledge. Euthyphro, also referred to as learned, soothsayer and diviner, postulated his belief that the relationship between man and the deities was more of a commercial beneficial relationship.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Socrates did not believe in the same gods as Athens, the easiest of his convictions to prove because of his Apology. In his plea, Socrates distracts the jury with stories of disbelievers. As the defense begins, he does not say that he does believe or disbelieve in the gods of Athens, since the easiest answer for an innocent man is “I did not do it.” Instead, he takes a route of disapproval and disbelief that this charge was brought up against him, “Socrates does injustice by not believing in gods, but believing in gods (p.77 27a),” he says in a mocking manner that is meant to make the jury question themselves. He further twists and turns the accusation by saying similar things; is there such thing as one who “believes… in human matters but not humans,” “not believing… in horse matters but believing in horses,” and “not believing in flute players, but believes in flute matter (p.77, 27a-b)?” To finish his point, he makes a final example of the atrocity of the charge against him, “Is there anyone who believes that there are daimonic matters, but does not believe in daimons (p.77, 27c)?” This argument…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was one of the most influential philosophers of all time. This amazing man was known only in the words of his students Plato and Xenophon. He fought in the Athenian army, he was a stone statuary, he was in the Athens assembly, and most of all he was a teacher of philosophy. Socrates was brave and fearless in the face of war and death; he was willing to fight for things he believed in. His words are still referenced today.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major themes that Socrates heavily focused on in his speech was the philosophical ideas of wisdom and a description of Socrates’ own wisdom as well. Older accusers had allegedly claimed that Socrates did not believe in gods, and instead would try to explain phenomenons through physical explanations instead, as well as the fact that Socrates would teach others how to make a weak argument triumph a stronger one by using clever rhetorics. In Socrates’ defense, he has stated that he does not have any kind of competence and expertise in any of these areas. This statement truly divides Socrates from sophists and even Presocratics, as teachers that each belong to these organizations assert that only through experience and examination they can gain…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Laches

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During his lifetime Socrates’ various interactions with his fellow Athenians left his intentions debatable. Popular belief in Athens seemed to be that, “he [Socrates] was an evildoer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven¸ and makes the worse appear the better cause” (Plato, pg. 5) as stated by the unofficial charges against him in The Apology. After discussions, his interlocutor’s were left confused in a state of aporia, with no conclusion. And so while negative views of Socrates became increasing popular in Athens right up until his death, Socrates was, on the contrary, serving as Athens’s benefactor, opening up their eyes to the truth of world in which they lived in. In Plato’s Laches, Socrates does in fact tear down his interlocutors’ claims but only to prove to them that they don’t know what they claim to know by exposing holes in their fundamental thoughts and to redirect them on a path to finding true knowledge.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What are the charges brought against Socrates by his Athenian accusers and what is his reply concerning the sort of wisdom he in fact possesses?…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defense on Socrates

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato's Apology), Meletus' fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jesus vs Socrates

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Socrates, known as the famous Greek philosopher and one of the wisest people around, was looked at as being a very strong willed and “stand-by-his-opinion” kind of man. Jesus, on the other hand, was a man who went through his life not by blatantly expressing and sharing his wisdom, but by making his “students” think things through for themselves in order to gain understanding and wisdom in certain topics. Based on what is known about Jesus and Socrates, two major moral figures in the world, it is hard to comprehend the major similarities that they obtain with one another because of their radical differences on how they lived their lives focusing on the way in which they were raised, what exactly they were standing up for and the way in which their lives ended because of it.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    People fear to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good.” Throughout the history of mankind, man has been fascinated with the mystery surrounding death. For many it is a phenomenon which is feared and for others it is a salvation from the misery and suffering of everyday life. In Plato’s “Apology”, Socrates has been sentenced to death and he claims that what “has befallen me is a blessing.” After the conclusion of his trial, he explains that there are two possible outcomes to death. Either death is a final end to one’s existence, or one dies and transcends to an eternal afterlife. Socrates says either outcome would be a “good thing.” If there is no life after death then death would be like sleeping with no dreams or interruptions. It would be the most peaceful and sound sleep you could experience. He says that eternity would be like one night’s sleep and that one night would be the equivalent of all the nights and days you had experienced until that point. You would no longer have to experience the pain of everyday life. And if there were life after death, it would be beneficial to you because you could meet and question great figures of history. He would be able to continue to examine and question the greatest people in history and continue to seek those who are wise. So Socrates invites death on himself and welcomes it. After arguing the two aforementioned points, he further justifies the premise that death is good by explaining that death will finally “rid him of all of his troubles.” This means his sufferings in life to include suffering from the ailments of old age will cease. He also explains that he does not fear death and could have paid a fine to avoid the death penalty. However, he refuses to abandon his principles and states that to abandon his…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays