Preview

What Role Did Women Play In Stalin's Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1139 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Role Did Women Play In Stalin's Russia
Date: 16th Nov. 2010 Nitin Goyal Women in Stalinist Russia
M.M. 15 Q) What was the role of women in Stalin’s Russia? Did he introduce any changes in the Bolshevik policies regarding the family? Ans. After the Bolsheviks came into power, they under the leadership of Lenin started a movement of social reform which was meant to break down the existing tsarist social system and to abolish all ‘bourgeois’ aspects of the system . It was at this time that Lenin attacked the institution of marriage which was considered bourgeois by the Marxist regime. Lenin firmly believed in women’s equality and therefore made efforts to liberate them from the bondage of children and family by making divorce easier. Little realising that such extremely reforms and such extreme communist ideology would not be accepted by the common people easily and quickly. This is what Stalin inherited by adhering to Lenin’s legacy. Stalin
…show more content…
Goldman explains that the Party policy of excluding women and non-proletarian workers from the work force slowed the rapid mobilization of labour required for the successful fulfilment of the First Five-Year Plan. In January of 1930, in the face of bitter protests from female activists, the Party eliminated the Zhenotdel, arguing that the rapid improvement of women’s status under communism eliminated the need for special attention. While the Party sought to channel women’s activism to fulfilling the new goals of rapid industrialization, it destroyed the very organization that might have facilitated its production goals. During this period, soviets, trade unions and factory management proved incapable of mobilizing and utilizing women in a planned and effective

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin ruled the Soviet Union between 1928 and 1954, effectively as a dictator. Within the first ten years of his period of rule, Stalin introduced significant change to the Soviet Union in areas of policy such as, industrialization, agriculture, education and culture. Despite the fact that some positive implications were perceived within the nation and soviet society regarding the outcomes of his policies relating to industrialization and education, the impact of his policies in the areas of agriculture, and culture were overwhelmingly damaging to the Russian people, and consequently, the nation as a whole. Thus, it is considered that the period falling from 1928 and 1938 held devastating implications for the soviet society, but less…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of women in 1928 was that of being part of the work industry; 3 million women were employed because of the demands of the Five-year plans. Though Soviet Russia was meant to be a ‘classless society’ there were still inequalities specifically between men and women. However by 1940 there were 13 million women working in the Russian industry which shows change nevertheless women spent an average of 5 times as longer on domestic responsibilities’ than men, this is an example of continuity.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as this, after Lenin's death, Stalin wanted to employ a policy of ‘Socialism in One Country’. This meant that he wanted socialism in only the USSR. This again differed from Marxist ideas as it went against internationalism. It was also in contrast with Trotsky, who wanted a ‘Permanent Revolution’ across the world. The main reason Stalin did this was to agree with Lenin’s ideas, as he was trying to appear to be the natural successor to Lenin.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. What was the relationship between industrialization and the women’s rights movement? What did women reformers want?…

    • 2282 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin had several methods of social control that gave him such a powerful rule in Russia that even today he still has supporters. Socialist Realism was an essential method to create this, although it was not the most important method of social control.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aglaya's Response To Stalin

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Her opinion was not unusual at the time. Stalin was the leader of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1922 until his death in 1953. Stalin was, essentially, the whole of the government. As Aglaya states, “Stalin was the Party, and the Party was Stalin (Voinovich, 23).” And the Party, at this time, had broad and general appeal. The Soviet citizen “...expected the state to provide a wide range of social benefits and services, as well as job security, and they approved the regime's stated welfare objectives (Bushnell, 362).” More importantly, the Party fulfilled these expectations. It redistributed resources. It intervened, should a business go bankrupt. The party nationalized industries and created jobs. Basic needs were provided for. Stalin gave workers a feeling of empowerment; there was no boss; there was just the state and the worker. With no sector of the population based entirely on money, social mobility was “exceptionally high (Vovchenko, 2/21).” As Aglaya undoubtedly appreciated, women were empowered. Daycare was made free. Through the collectivization of agriculture, food production increased during the 1940s and 1950s. The party was responsible for, in short, all aspects of the economic and social development of the nation (Ibid). The state was the only agent capable of providing the…

    • 2546 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx had predicted that under communism the state would wither away. The opposite occurred under the Stalin. He turned the Soviet Union into a totalitarian state. In this form of government, a one-party dictatorship attempts to regulate every aspect of the lives of its citizen. You have already seen how Stalin purged political rivals and imposed central government control over industry and agriculture.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nazi’s devotion to making mothers out of the women of their country was tempered by the rearmament of Germany. The renewed industry needed new workers and they needed women. Just like in the United States “only a war economy gave women the chance, in one worker’s words, ‘to actually apply for the office jobs of which we had scarcely dared to dream…

    • 4075 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The nature of Stalin's economic policies and their impact on the people of Russia is a widely debated topic. It's also a difficult topic on which to focus an enquiry, complicated as it is by the reluctance of the Soviets to release all relevant documents, and the political views of those interpreting to documents, driven as many were by their own agendas. However, the documents that have been selected for this enquiry have been chosen for the light they shed on the problem and in the expectation that they will enable a conclusion, however provisional, to be drawn.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argumentative paper presents clashing views on controversial issues in Western Civilization. The particular issue under consideration is the Bolshevik Revolution. Two authors, Richard Stites, and Françoise Navailh argue out the issue; Stites argues that the Bolshevik Revolution improved the lives of Soviet women while Navailh's argument suggests otherwise. In summary, Stites attributes women emancipation to the Women's Department (Zhenotdel) at the onset of the Bolshevik Revolution. Stites concludes that the Zhenotdel's efforts to raise the consciousness of the Soviet women in a male-dominated society resulted in women's liberation. On the other hand, Navailh…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The role of the children in family life was another convention that was changed drastically by the Soviets. The children, under the Soviet Union belonged to the country and the government, not their parents. In order for this to be successful, the government had to take on the full responsibilities of educating the children and providing care facilities to decrease the responsibilities of the parents. The term “social education” was created under this new belief. The reasoning behind this was in order to not only produce hundreds of thousands of productive workers, but to also free mothers who were constrained by their children, forced to stay home and take care of them. This would allow these mothers…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays