What The Buddha Taught
“What The Buddha Taught,” by Walpola Rahula is a faithful account of the Buddha’s teachings and acts as an introduction to Buddhism’s various facets. Taken from multiple ancient documents, “What The Buddha Taught” gives a broad overview of pillar stones of the religion including “The Four Noble Truths” and the “Noble Eightfold Path” namely. With regards to idea of permanence or impermanence, the Buddha states that all things in this world are in a state of constant flux with all things changing every moment. The concept of “no soul” is another teaching presented by the Buddha in which the only things relating to the individual is that of the “Five Aggregates” which are matter (rupa), sensations (vedana), perceptions (samjna), mental formations
…show more content…
Mathematics had yet to manifest itself in its complete form thus not permeating itself as a constant in the world. Although Hindu society was making the largest discoveries as to the nature of math, it was still in an early phase of growth (Stearns, 134). Indeed as the society changed and shifted their focus onto the discovery of more nuanced thinking regarding the sciences. The early Indian caste system does not clearly state the societal place of people who practice science and math, which would more or less prevent a solid basis for learning in the culture. (Lecture 5) Because of this and perhaps moreover, maybe there was a conscious effort to avoid the more material aspects of the culture of the time. The Buddha says that all compound things are in the end meaningless and presumably this means that followers of Buddhism should not pursue these ideas. This two-part idea of caste system, which ignores the discoverers and the Buddhists who don’t know the aspects of permanent science, could indeed be a realistic answer for the lack of understanding. With Buddhists not interested in learning the advancements of the time and culture that simply does not know about it either, it is not hard to assume that the lack of full realization of permanent things in the world is not there at
Mathematics had yet to manifest itself in its complete form thus not permeating itself as a constant in the world. Although Hindu society was making the largest discoveries as to the nature of math, it was still in an early phase of growth (Stearns, 134). Indeed as the society changed and shifted their focus onto the discovery of more nuanced thinking regarding the sciences. The early Indian caste system does not clearly state the societal place of people who practice science and math, which would more or less prevent a solid basis for learning in the culture. (Lecture 5) Because of this and perhaps moreover, maybe there was a conscious effort to avoid the more material aspects of the culture of the time. The Buddha says that all compound things are in the end meaningless and presumably this means that followers of Buddhism should not pursue these ideas. This two-part idea of caste system, which ignores the discoverers and the Buddhists who don’t know the aspects of permanent science, could indeed be a realistic answer for the lack of understanding. With Buddhists not interested in learning the advancements of the time and culture that simply does not know about it either, it is not hard to assume that the lack of full realization of permanent things in the world is not there at