What Was Never Taught
Chapter III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION This chapter presents the data obtained through the survey conducted, and the analysis of the data using the appropriate statistical treatment and the interpretation of the results obtained.
Problem No. 1: What is the level of performance of third year students in?
Table 3
Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour Gender Gender | Mean | Standard Deviation | Qualitative Description | Male | 3.21 | 0.58 | fair | Female | 2.94 | 0.59 | fair | Overall | 3.04 | -0.60 | Fair |
Table 3 summarizes the academic Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour according to gender. The data shows that the mean of male students is 3.21with a standard deviation of 0.58 which is interpreted as fair. Moreover, the female students obtained a mean of 2.94 with a standard deviation of 0.59 that can be interpreted as fair. Comparatively, it can be generalized that Female respond better than Male.
Table 4
Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour by Section Section | Mean | Standard Deviation | Qualitative Description | Rizal | 3.12 | 0.59 | Fair | Bonifacio | 2.91 | 0.68 | Fair | Mabini | 3.10 | 0.50 | Fair | Overall | 3.04 | 0.60 | Fair |
Table 4 presents the Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour when categorized according to section. The data shows that the mean of Rizal students is 3.12 with a standard deviation of 0.59 which is interpreted as Fair. Furthermore, Bonifacio students obtained a mean of 2.91 with a standard deviation of 0.68 that is interpreted as Fair. The mean of Mabini is 3.10 with a standard deviation of 0.50. It can be generalized from the data that Bonifacio have a better Perception in all Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour than the other two sections. As a whole, the mean of all the Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION This chapter presents the data obtained through the survey conducted, and the analysis of the data using the appropriate statistical treatment and the interpretation of the results obtained.
Problem No. 1: What is the level of performance of third year students in?
Table 3
Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour Gender Gender | Mean | Standard Deviation | Qualitative Description | Male | 3.21 | 0.58 | fair | Female | 2.94 | 0.59 | fair | Overall | 3.04 | -0.60 | Fair |
Table 3 summarizes the academic Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour according to gender. The data shows that the mean of male students is 3.21with a standard deviation of 0.58 which is interpreted as fair. Moreover, the female students obtained a mean of 2.94 with a standard deviation of 0.59 that can be interpreted as fair. Comparatively, it can be generalized that Female respond better than Male.
Table 4
Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour by Section Section | Mean | Standard Deviation | Qualitative Description | Rizal | 3.12 | 0.59 | Fair | Bonifacio | 2.91 | 0.68 | Fair | Mabini | 3.10 | 0.50 | Fair | Overall | 3.04 | 0.60 | Fair |
Table 4 presents the Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour when categorized according to section. The data shows that the mean of Rizal students is 3.12 with a standard deviation of 0.59 which is interpreted as Fair. Furthermore, Bonifacio students obtained a mean of 2.91 with a standard deviation of 0.68 that is interpreted as Fair. The mean of Mabini is 3.10 with a standard deviation of 0.50. It can be generalized from the data that Bonifacio have a better Perception in all Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour than the other two sections. As a whole, the mean of all the Perception of Third Year High School Students on Disruptive Behaviour