What Was The Difference Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

During the early years of American History, the Articles of Confederation began to fail and officials realized that a new document needed to be written in place of the Articles. This debate of what to do formed two main groups, the federalists and antifederalists. In the following paragraphs I will explain five key issues and each side of the argument. Each side will be explained because I do not think one side could fully encapsulate what was needed in the new central government.
It is true that there have been very few successful republics in the history of the world. That being said it could also be stated that there have been very few successful governments throughout history. In the ancient world some of our greatest political thinkers, (Socrates, Plato, etc.) came from cities governed through a republic. The federalist stance
The federalists thought that I would suffice to see to it that taxes are only levied out of necessity as far as the federal government would be concerned. However, the Antifederalists countered this by stating that if one person became a tyrannical leader such taxes could burden the people once more. They also thought that by paying representatives it would take their interest away from the people they represented and turn them to personal interest to gain success. As stated in The Address and Reasons of Dissent of the Minority of the Convention of Pennsylvania to their constituents, “ it appears that the Congress under this constitution will not possess the confidence of the people, which is an essential requisite in a good government…”. In this way, most people agreed that taxes should only be levied by the state government, but that would leave no way to pay for national needs like