Preview

Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
Federalists were a group supported by large farmers, traders, artisans who wanted a stronger national government and the ratification of the Constitution; also they were a well-organized group. In the other hand Anti federalist were a group supported by Small farmers, often from rural areas who though that the states would lose influence thanks to the growth of the national government’s power. As we can see these two groups had different points of view. Anti-Federalists believed that the government should be ruled by the common man. Contrary to this, the Federalists believed the government should be ruled by the elite. Another notable issue where these two groups strongly disagreed was the Bill Of Rights. Federalist believed that it was not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Federalist believed that there should be a strong, central government in order to maintain domestic security and liberty. The federalist wanted the constitution to be ratified. The Anti-Federalists wanted to bar the constitution that was drafted from being ratified. They felt that this gave the government too much power. They argued that the drafters were all part of the colonial Aristocracy, and therefore, could not and would not stand for the common good of the nation, but would instead be overbearing, and hostile to the common people.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They were the people who opposed the new constitution. They were afraid of a stronger government.Anti-Federalism refers to a movement that opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists where two political parties during the 1700s and early 1800s. “The supporters of the new Constitution immediately adopted the name Federalists to describe themselves. Their opponent had to contend themselves with the negative label Anti-Federalist”(Faragher 180). The Federalist believed in a strong federal government that would over see the country for the most part, where the Anti-Federalist believed that the states should have more power and not have a great influence from the federal government. The Federalist won is most part because of the people that lived in these Anti-Federalist states wanting to adopted the constitution.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was being written and ratified, there were two main political factions, each having ideas that were vastly diverse from each other. While Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist, many of the other Constitution makers were Federalists. John Adams, a Federalist, was elected as the second American president in 1796 and served in office until 1800.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the Constitution was drafted by exceptional men with divine help from Heavenly Father, people of all ages have interpreted the language of the Constitution differently than others. This difficulty caused many different groups to form their own opinion on what they thought the Constitution was saying. This was especially evident when our country was first formed and during the Civil War. It all started with the Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist campaign in the 1790’s.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the Constitution of the United States was originally created, it did not contain a Bill of Rights. In the Constitutional Convention, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights was not necessary. Opposingly, the Anti-Federalists argued that the central government had too much power and that our Constitution needed a Bill of Rights that would explicitly state the rights of the citizens. In order to settle disputes between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists that claimed the government had an imbalance of power, the Bill of Rights was created. Containing the first ten Amendments, the Bill of Rights ultimately split up the powers and gave specific duties to the separate branches to create balance in power between the state and central…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Bill of Rights was the main cause of the ratification between Anti-federalist and Federalist, one side the Anti- federalist…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The anti-federalists were also concerned that the original text of the constitution did not contain a bill of rights. They thought the new constitution failed to protect personal liberties and individual rights and that a stronger government was a threat to the sovereignty of the states. After long debate the members of the newly established House of Representatives approved twelve amendments. Ten of these amendments were known as the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    money, lack of respect by foreign powers, territories in the possession of a foreign power,…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Southern slave states and northern non slave states big states and small states Federalists and Anti Federalists all they needed to compromise come to an agreement on several issues in order to satisfy everyone interest. Federalists wanted a strong central government with control over the states led by Alexander Hamilton. Anti Federalists feared that individual states would lose their freedom under a strong central government led by Thomas…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic ideas of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are that the Federalists were for the adoption of the Constitution while the Anti-federalists were against adopting the Constitution. Federalists wanted a strong central government that can rule the U.S straightforward instead of through the state government. For example, Federalists wanted a system that contained a strong federal court, allowed the federal government to raise taxes directly from the people, and fund the state militias. Anti-federalists were the opposite and wanted a weak government that could serve the functions of the government. For example, Anti-federalists were opposed to the U.S. Supreme Court to have jurisdiction, receive money from the state governments, and…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti-federalists believed in the new constitution obtaining such power can lead to infringement of civil rights by wealthy Americans. For instance, wealthy Americans lobbying the government for certain laws to pass against the middle and lower class. Even though Henry failed to convince the government to reject the new constitution, Henry opened the eyes of Federalists. According to Patrick Henry, “They not foresee latent consequences: I dread the operation of it on the middling and lower class of people: It is for them I fear the adoption of this system” (VOF, pg. 129).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of American History, the Articles of Confederation began to fail and officials realized that a new document needed to be written in place of the Articles. This debate of what to do formed two main groups, the federalists and antifederalists. In the following paragraphs I will explain five key issues and each side of the argument. Each side will be explained because I do not think one side could fully encapsulate what was needed in the new central government. It is true that there have been very few successful republics in the history of the world.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists were happy that there was a federal government and that they were unified, and the anti-federalists were happy that they had their own individual rights and a checks and balance system to keep corruption from occurring in the government. Everyone has their own opinion, America is very diverse today and it was diverse in beliefs back then, so it was extremely hard for all of the colonists to stick together, without hurting one another, and form a unified country with a constitution that kept it all together, they were very patient, they had to be it was their ‘perfect’ government. Everyone wanted the perfect constitution because they wanted to prevent anything from happening that happened with their old king. The constitution had to be settled on, so both sides got some of their ideas put in, but both also had to give up some things to finally come together on a government, because the last one (Articles of Confederation) wasn’t working and the country wasn’t…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the two primary political parties at the time the Constitution was written. However, these two groups preferred different types of government. Nevertheless, Federalists wanted a government that was strong and powerful at the heart and was ruled mostly by the upper class, while Anti-Federalists preferred a government that wasn’t ruled so much by the central government, but more ruled by the states so that they could have their own rights.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays