When Was Hitler Justified

The anecdotes of any ambitious man reveal on results and not on the character. Many films have painted Hitler as a mass murderer and provocative leader without the ability to participate in any meaningful debate. He was not a social giant and kept as few friends as possible. Furthermore, history decorates him as a person who could not build a sustainable intimate relationship opting to casual engagements. In as much as this may be true, Hitler only tried to bring sanity back to Germany. Before taking power many Jews had invaded Germany, coming from various countries. Some were seeking asylum while other came to exploit the rich resources. Because of the invasion, the country was losing its moral code and culture. The antisocial Jews engaged
in destructive practices seeking to overturn the previously enjoyed peace. Naturally, the native people want a sense of belonging to their country and Hitler presented no offense by communication to the Jews.
Germany needed sanity, organization, and a change of operation at a time when many countries were struggling to appear in the world landscape. The containment camps were not places for human experiments as presented by many people in the contemporary world. Being the Human that he was, Hitler created the camps to act as buffer zones for the many Jews that had dominated Germany. The camps had sufficient food, football pitches, theaters, and schools. People within the camps could easily communicate to the outside world and even get access to other resources that maybe were not available within the institutions. It was a rehabilitation system meant to control the mind and change the overwhelming perception of hate, which had developed. In essence, Hitler saw well in changing the society and had it not been for the war, valuable results could have been recorded.
It is often thought that Hitler was the one behind “6 million” Jews being administered into gas chambers.
In fact out of the nearly “6 million” claims of Jews being gassed, not a single body autopsy showed signs of cyanide poisoning. I believe they should reconsider their opinions and build them on hard, factual proof instead of myths and false accusations. Hitler was a warrior and his tireless resolve to deliver his people great results never faded despite opposition from different countries. The essence and love for success did not change his autonomy. He gave room for dialogue and consultation but did not grant any outside decisions the opportunity to erode his thinking. The conscious level of any individual gives them the opportunity to serve people in different ways. The degrading set up of Jews established its fame within the Austria and German environments but did not make milestone achievements because of
Hitler.
In conclusion, Hitler was a victim of political smear campaign developed by competing countries.
All over news, publication, and films, he comes out as a personality with quire motives. Additionally, he is perceived as an avid racists and a religious demon that thrived in fear as well as emotional manipulation to rule. He is also regarded as a psychological and emotional failure that held people in containment camps opting to kill them through gas chambers to save the available resources. In reality, Hitler was more than a good person and leader. He was a visionary man with great plans for Germany despite the several challenges met. Above all, he made Germany standout among many nations not only expanding its boundaries but also ensuring sustainability. I think Hitler should be recognized as an adequate dictator for his concern in passing laws to protect animals, his idea in creating the world’s strongest anti-smoking campaign, and his mission to satisfy every poor and middle class German during economic distress, and we need to ask ourselves; Were we too occupied by its negative sides that we forgot to look at the positive
ones?