Preview

Whistle Blower Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whistle Blower Case Study
Whistle Blower

44) The Plaintiff was a whistle blower when he informed John Cora, and the Defendant Violated the 1st and 14th Amendment rights. The Plaintiff was a Whistle blower again when he informed the City of Casper of the illegal activity of Anderson and Langston.
45) Cindy Langston has destroyed her emails after a FOIA request, in violation of the sunshine law and the Public records act.
46) The State of Wyoming has not filed a Solid Waste Management Plan as required and this was discovered because of a FOIA request.
47) During FOIA request it was determined that Wyoming DEQ has not filed a oild Waste Management Plan.
Breach of Contract / Intentional infliction of emotional distress, for prima facie tort Tortious Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith
…show more content…

54) Unless the Defendant can produce a valid resignation that meets the requirements of the Contract the contract has been breached.
55) Defendant stopped all contact and sent a check for partial payment of damages.
56) Wyo § 1‑1‑108. Voluntary partial payment of liability claims.
No voluntary partial payment of a claim based on alleged liability for injury or property damage shall be construed as an admission of fault or liability, or as a waiver or release of claim by the person receiving payment.

57) Unlike Kirkland1 who did not exhaust Administrative remedies, did not claim consitutional violations; because it appears the school district had cause to release him, the Plaintiff spent 6 months fighting for his rights and good name. After being reinstated the Plaintiff was wrongfully terminated again, then the Defendants falsely constructed a resignation, when the Plaintiff signed a Settlement Agreement (required $550,000 for defamation, and had a retaliation clause), and a pleading in District court. The employment contract at the time only allowed a person the right to Appeal. The State is not a person.
Contract


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On May 22, 1996, two days after the incident, the plaintiff, who was not scheduled to work that day, returned to the restaurant curious to determine whether there was any hostility toward him resulting from his having called the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he was summarily ordered by David Badot, the restaurant’s manager, to come into his office and that Badot proceeded to shout at him while inquiring whether he had contacted the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he shouted back at Badot and acknowledged that he had indeed called Department of Health. Badot then accused the plaintiff of stealing one of the defendant’s softball team shirts and of taking a work schedule home.…

    • 757 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trueblood

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lack of Information (LOI) has 25 warehouses which contain asbestos. LOI has chosen not to recognize an asset retirement obligation for any of the warehouses. There are three different sets of facts as to why LOI is not recognizing an obligation. For each set of circumstances we will determine if LOI is properly omitting an asset retirement obligation or if further action is necessary.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Ms. Deters, the plaintiff, sued Equifax, the defendant, in the United States District Court for the district of Kansas after being sexually harassed on several different occasions by three different co-workers and also the original male supervisor. Violating Title VII, prohibiting discrimination of employees based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. Ms. Deters filed multiple complaints on the daily sexual harassment that had taken place at the office. Mr. Taylor indicated he would handle the sexual harassment, him being the highest managerial position in the office. Mr. Taylor was also designated by Equifax to enact its human resource policies. The courts entry of judgment in the favor of the employee denied the defendants motion on the issue of punitive damages. However, Equifax did not agree with the decision of the court and wanted a judgment as a mater of law de novo. Equifax litigates that the evidence was not in support of the punitive damages.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LOI 10-4

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    visits at each of the 50 locations. The related findings of the interviews and site visits…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SAMPLE MEMO FORMAT 2013 10

    • 1581 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Should LOI recognize an asset retirement obligation for the two warehouses in states without special asbestos handling and disposal laws?…

    • 1581 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The District Court held the City liable for the harassment carried by its supervisory employees, arguing that Terry and Silverman were acting as the City's “agents” when they committed the harassing acts. The Court of Appeals believed that Terry and Silverman’s relationship with the City did not enable the harassment and therefore could not be credited to the City. In addition, the Court of Appeals counter-argued that the City could not be held liable for failing to prevent their actions.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 310 Week 1 Quiz

    • 517 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ASHFORD POL 310 Week 1 DQ 2 Common Pool Resources – Privatization or Collective Action…

    • 517 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff being the state represented by the District Attorney was right in their determination to hold somebody liable for these actions. Had there not been an…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the insider, working developer, I have weighed out both outcomes of whether to follow through with my supervisor’s request to include information about the landfill history or not. I found that there is more implications and negative consequences if I choose to not inform the public about the landfill history. Loyalty to the company is still at high priority for me, but so is my loyalty to the public. I feel that it should be in the company’s best interest to maintain loyalty to the public’s interest.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the book, the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as an extreme and outrageous act, intentionally committed, that results in severe emotional distress to another. To be actionable (capable of serving as the ground for a lawsuit), the conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by society. Business Law Today, 10th Edition, pg. 99.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Investigators were notified when a victim reported that her email and Facebook accounts had been hijacked and inappropriate messages sent to her entire contact list, in Connecticut. When an Ex-parte…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whistle Blowing

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Write a report explaining the importance of ensuring children and young people's safety and protection in the work setting. The report needs to cover the following sections:Section 1: InductionExplain why it is important to ensure children and young people are protected from harm in the work setting.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistle Blowing

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    situation of Mayor Alex Allen. The plaintiff ACCUSES the Village of Empireville and the Board…

    • 17951 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays