Preview

Whistleblower Policy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4021 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whistleblower Policy
Abstract

In today’s age of globalisation , wherein corporations have no conscience while they run the rate race of profit making , all virtues and traditions of the art of doing business take a backseat. The ethics of emergencies are never implemented and economic virtues precede over everything else. In such a scenario, it becomes all the more imperative to prevent violations itself from becoming norms, to protect public interest from huge corporate scandals.

In an attempt to safeguard the corporations and the economy on the whole, a robust whistleblower policy as part of the corporate governance strategy is a very valuable tool. It empowers employees to act on incidences of misconduct and help maintain a safe workplace, while protecting profits and reputation.

1. Introduction

“If you must sin, sin against God, not against the bureaucracy. God may forgive you, but the bureaucracy never will!”

— Admiral Hyman Rickover, U.S.A

The quote describes the ultimate fate of wrongdoers or partners in corporate malpractices and signifies the importance of the role of the whistleblower in today’s society, where increasing emphasis is placed on corporate governance in a direct response to corporate collapses. The main motive of corporate governance is to strike an appropriate balance between “independence” and “control” which translates to the correct differentiation between “transparency” and “accountability”

The term “Whistleblowing” is a relatively recent entry in the public and corporate affairs vocabulary but the phenomenon or the process has been into development for long. It originated from the practice of English Bobbies who would blow their whistle when they noticed the commission of a crime. The blowing of the whistle would alert both law enforcement officers and the general public of danger.
The formal definition goes something like -: the process by which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This incident Challenger present us a case study in organizational communication, ethics and culture as it promotes or discourages necessary communication and the ethics of whistle blowing.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA’s Edward Snowden, FBI’s Mark Felt, White House Staffer Linda Tripp, Kerr-McGee’s Karen Silkwood and Sherron Watkins of Enron are all on the same list of famous whistleblowers. All of these people have become famous because they provided information with the sole purpose of revealing wrongdoings by someone or a company. Some believe whistleblowers are traitors and should be punished: while others believe they are heroes and should be honored. Whistleblowers are being acknowledged as a great threat to companies and managers are realizing that they need to know who they are and what they will do if their company is faced with this situation.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 573 Week 1 Homework

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whistleblowers are the main ones that expose white-collar crimes in contemporary society. Whistleblowers are the ones that let the authorities and the public that another person is being involved in illegal activities occurring in the work place. Illegal activities can include fraud, violations of rules, laws, and or procedures. A whistleblower may tell someone within his or her organization or someone in law enforcement. In order to be a whistleblower according to federal authorities, the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey (2015), whistleblowers are people who decide to report unethical or illegal activities, usually activities under the control of their employers. They may be working for private companies, nonprofit organizations, or for the government. A whistleblower is an individual working in an organization who decides to expose the misconduct, misbehavior, or illegal actions occurring in that organization. Making the decision to expose these actions can be very difficult to disclose with the fear of repercussion. The information being disclosed to supervisors or the media can either be inside or outside their organization. There are a number of organization or groups out there that are concerned with issues in organization and when a whistleblower is exposing corruption, those groups make themselves available for the whistleblower to make their allegations.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enron Argument

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities. However, Sharron Watkins only blew the whistle internally and so did not do everything she was morally required do as Vice President of Corporate Development for Enron.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silkwood

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While there are many rewards to whistle blowing, there are also many risks to whistle blowing as well. One of the rewards of whistle blowing is that the laws or acts being violated will be corrected by the correct regulation agencies. Whistleblowers are even able to submit a confidential report online through National Whistleblowers Center website where attorneys review the information and give advice on the best ways to proceed with the investigation. There are also information and additional resources available for those who are thinking about blowing the whistle on their company. A risk of whistleblowing on the company can lead to alienation between the whistleblower and their…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistleblower protection. This organization has voluntarily adopted a whistleblower protection policy. If any employee of this organization is aware of any violation of law or regulation, which would include financial wrongdoing, it should be immediately reported to the President or Chief Operating Officer , in which an investigation will be pursued. The employee who reports any wrongdoing will not face retaliation if the complaint is filed in good faith. Appropriate disciplinary action will be used if the person is found to be guilty. The identity of the employee who filed the complaint will be…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paradox Of Missing Harm

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The three paradoxes that Davis claims the standard theory give rise to are the paradox of burden, the paradox of missing harm, and the paradox of failure. According to Davis, the paradox of burden perceives the whistle-blower as a good Samaritans because they take on substantial risk in their career, financial securities, and personal relation. The standard theory does not provide sufficient condition to justify such risk. Second, the paradox of missing harm argues that the whistleblower is reported damage after the fact, and they often act in the condition that they can prevent harm. Finally, the paradox of failure indicates that the whistleblowers have little success in preventing damage.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    WHISTLE-BLOWERS have been big news lately — from Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Pfc. Bradley Manning, to Edward J. Snowden. Yet, for most people, the question of whether to expose unethical or illegal activities at work doesn’t make headlines or involve state secrets.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistle Blowing

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The law protecting whistle blowing should be included in all policies, of any operating government agency. This is because; information that is found as an illegal act towards the government should be reported immediately before it is leaked out to the society and chaos can be a factoring outcome of this.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 (“the Act”) supports the Government’s commitment to the principles of open, honest and accountable governance. It is designed to protect the public interest by: • exposing serious public sector wrongdoing; • ensuring public organisations are responsible and accountable; and • protecting whistleblowers from detrimental action and protecting their privacy.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistleblowers take huge personal and business risks to blow the whistle on what went wrong inside an organization. For instance, there is Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, the tobacco company researcher who exposed his employer on "60 Minutes" for lying about the dangers of smoking. There is Randy Robarge, a former radiation protection supervisor at Com Ed?s nuclear power plant in Zion. He blew the whistle in 1996 on alleged procedural violations he feared could lead to a catastrophic event. There is Karen Silkwood, a chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee's plutonium fuels production plant in Crescent, Oklahoma, and a member of the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers' Union. She was also an activist who was critical of plant safety. Wigand and Robarge were both fired. Karen Silkwood died on November 13, 1974 in a fatal one-car crash. Their jobs, their health, their privacy, their sanity, their life?they risked all of them to bring us badly needed word of trouble inside crucial institutions.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insider tells the story of Jeffrey Wigand, a scientist and executive with Brown and Williamson, a major tobacco manufacturer, who decides to come forward and “blow the whistle” on “Big Tobacco.” His testimony in the Mississippi’s lawsuit against the tobacco companies revealed that the CEOs of these companies knew the addictive affects of cigarettes, despite their testimony to the contrary in front of a Congressional hearing. However, this whistle blowing presents many moral and ethical problems. This paper will not only present those issues, but the justifications for whistle-blowing and whether or not Wigand was justified in his whistle-blowing; whether or not he is credible; the importance of his family as shown in the film; how Wigand and Lowell Bergman, producer of “60 Minutes” and the person who convinces Wigand to come forward, feel about confidentiality agreements; and, lastly, what kids of conflicts of interest Wigand engages in when he comes forward.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays