Preview

Whitness Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Whitness Essay
In the film "Witness" starring Harrison Ford, producer Peter Weir has created two different worlds with different value systems. He has done this through the use of juxta-positioning, camera angles set at different heights and the process of character development. In the Film, John Book played by Harrison Ford plays the parts of detective, protector, and refugee, all to solve the murder case of another Police Officer. The only witness to the murder is 7-year-old Samuel who is unofficially under Books protection against everyone from corrupt cops to the murderer.
In the film "Witness" starring Harrison Ford, the producer, Peter Weir, has created two different worlds with different value systems. He has done this through the use of juxta-positioning, camera angles set at different heights and the process of character development. In the movie, John Book (Harrison Ford) plays the parts of detective, protector, and refugee, all to solve the murder case of another Police Officer. The only witness to the murder is 7-year-old Samuel who is unofficially under Books protection against everyone from corrupt cops to the murderer.
The two worlds that Peter Weir creates, and tries to communicate their differences to us is the traditional Amish society as appose to our modern contempory society. The Amish society follows an unwritten rule of others before self. This is demonstrated during the stereotypical, Hollywood famous barn-building scene. During the scene we see Daniel, a member of the Amish society, putting aside his dislike for John Book throughout the task of the barn building. He helps Book work and shares his lemonade during a short interval in the work. He prioritises the task of helping his community to finish building the barn over his personal disagreement with Book over Rachael's attentions. The only time during the scene where we see any hostility between the two characters is during the lunch break where the goal of building the barn is put on hold for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Double Indemnity, the movie and the book that describes how a perfect crime or what was thought of perfect went wrong. The author of Double Indemnity, James Cain shows and tells the audience a summary of what is going to happen in just the opening scene of the book and in the movie. The opening scene is significant because it reveals what is going to happen in the story.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This novel is an account of a crime that involves a man named Sgt. John Wilson, arranged in a way that a work of fiction…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Rear Window’s opening scene, the camera slowly scans the setting that will surround L.B. Jeffries for the rest of the film. It pans over many apartments, all full of people doing different activities, going on his or her daily routine. This seemingly normal day in the New York City apartment complex gives the audience a sense of familiarity with the setting, and the people that live there. As seen through Jeffries’ rear window, this scene foreshadows the rest of the film; little does the audience know that what seems ordinary, a simple window, actually reveals more: crime.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The character hides their other self and who they or what they have done. In The Strange…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Preston is the protagonist of the film. He holds the rank of Grammaton Cleric First Class, a man trained to locate and arrest those guilty of feeling. His intuitive ability to discern sense-offenders, people who have halted their doses of Prozium and can feel emotion, gives him the aptitude to hunt these people down. Furthermore his perfection of Gun Kata, which is a fictional gun-fighting martial art discipline, and his lack of emotions make him the deadliest of enforcers.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The different types of characters in the jury decision create many different examples of approaches to conflict. Jury member number two, the quiet man with the glasses, becomes the target of many of the other characters. When the men are all going around and explaining their reasons for why they feel the boy is guilty, Jury member number three interrupts and says, “what about the switch-knife found in the man’s…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Picking Cotton

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Having multiple speakers in the novel also has its disadvantages. By changing perspectives from Thompson to Cotton, the reader is neglected the others thoughts during a certain time. While Cotton tells of his prison time, the read does not know how Thompson is the novel during this time. When the novel changes speakers back to Thompson she is married with children. There is a missing gap of time the reader never…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drama Mugged Response

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In lesson 6 we had to summarise how each character might feel about the murder. In lesson 6, we used guilt spilt staging, voice & contrasts, We used one of the forms of stimuli of ‘play scripts’ . In the play script we explored the line ‘ I told him not to come back didn’t I mel’ to understand how all the characters feel guilty. The characters feel guilty because marky has been murdered. All the characters feel conscience-stricken and guilt ridden. The script changes throughout the ending of the play it raises the tension by shortening the dialogue. The characters speech becomes shortened and there words become more scarce and sudden . We then did a police interview by the use of drama medium ; split staging. Split staging can use two or more different levels, and the audience can see characters better if one group is behind the other and using the raised level. Me and shea was the police officers interviewing dig and sophie which in this case was Hodan and Arthur. We asked them questions such as , how do…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film then shows from other witnesses’ point of view, Darrow Igus and Jessie Mae Holmes how they see the crime and how such a strong opinion can change the way people see things in life.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Other than justice, his attentive quality commands the readers’ admiration. Using his intelligence, Atticus questions the witness strictly and gets the answer from it. However, before questioning, he often listens carefully to the witness’s testimony. During the trial, he gives chance to the witness to speak first. While they give their testimony, Atticus never interrupt them. From Bob and Mayella’s testimony, he finds out the clue so that when he reviews the case, the witnesses do not have any excuse to defend themselves and at the same time, he has an evidence to defend Tom Robinson better. “Atticus sometimes said that one way to tell whether a witness was lying or telling the truth was to listen rather than watch” (19). His attentive quality…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith, S.M., Stinson, V., & Prosser, M.A. (2004). Do they all look alike? An exploration…

    • 2345 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    mirrors the narrator's behavior. There for she too is also behind bars. Another parallel between the actions of the narrator…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My understanding of the narrator added to the suspense of the story because he seemed out of it all the time which makes me want to know what he doesn’t know himself. “I know not where I was born”, “I cannot recall any person except myself”, and “I do not recall hearing any human voice” (The Outsider 21-22). These three pieces of evidence show that he doesn’t remember a lot from when he was a child or even him now. The evidence also proves that he is an unreliable narrator. Knowing this added so much suspense to the story for me because it made me wonder what he did not know and that there is so much more.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The protagonist in the jury room, juror 8, and the antagonist in the jury room, juror 3, both back up their opinion as to whether or not the Hispanic boy is guilty or innocent. The jurors reasoning behind their opinions are based on facts and details from the trial and are very logical and believable. Juror 8 and juror 3 both try to persuade the other jurors with their reasoning and they both believe strongly of their opinion. The protagonist and the antagonist have many more differences than they do similarities; this brings the dictation to last for many tense and hostile hours.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Abiding Citizen

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One scene in the movie instantly grabbed my attention; it was during a court scene, during Shelton’s (Gerard Butler) hearing, Shelton (Gerard Butler) launches into a tirade against the judge. The Judge and he gets into a shouting match, about how the judge was about to set him free because he cited a few legal examples of why he should be set free. He demonstrates how the legal system will set a person free just because of some legal technicalities, even when it is clear and evident that the defendant committed the murders or crimes. The judicial system focuses more on moving on to the next case that upholding justice is lost.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays