Preview

Who Is Paulus In Victory At Stalingrad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Paulus In Victory At Stalingrad
Roberts in his book, Victory at Stalingrad, makes several comparisons between Paulus, who headed the 6th Army of Germany and Chuikov, leader of the 65th Army for Russia. With these differences, Roberts explains the underlying factors that contributed to Germany’s overwhelming defeat at Stalingrad. According to Roberts, Paulus was “a highly competent, but unimaginative officer, an operational technician rather than a field commander,” (82). I take this to mean that Paulus had the knowledge and skill to lead the 6th Army, but lacked the nerve that was required to make quick and informed decisions. Paulus’s lack of gusto and chutzpa played a major role in Germany’s defeat at the Battle of Stalingrad. Roberts refers to Chuikov, on the other …show more content…

During the battle, Chuikov never left his post, despite coming close to the grips of death on several occasions. Chuikov lead from the front, and as a result, his leadership is often referenced as the cause of Russia‘s victory. After all, it was Chuikov who marched the first troops into Berlin at the end of WWII. Because Paulus did not have that direct communication, nor relationship with his men, by the time things got really bad, Paulus was no longer able to control his men, which also led to Germany’s …show more content…

General Paulus did not think with his own brain, and instead of choosing the best options for his men, he went along with Hitler’s unrealistic notion of ‘fight to the death.” That is to say, up until it meant his own death, at which point he came to the realization that he wasn‘t willing to go that far. The Germans should have left when they had the opportunity, and it is because they remained in Stalingrad that Germany suffered such a defeat. Though Paulus was lacking in leadership skills, it cannot be forgotten that Germany was fighting at a distinct disadvantage due to the fact that they were not operating on their own turf. The Soviets knew the layout of the land and used that to their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Assignment 1 Bus 518

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Example two is his handling of the staff that was being sent from the supporting units. He found that the units where not sending their best staff and instead was sending the least motivated troops. “Either because they were not convinced that the evacuation was a crucial mission or simply because they did not want to detract from their ongoing operations by spending energy on it.” (Laufer) He was disappointed in what he found so he devised a plan to get the personnel he needed. First he instructed his team leaders to identify those least suitable for the mission, second he asked all of the feeder units for highly qualified troops which was met with resistance and lastly he went to his superior and advised him that “Without the personal involvement and commitment to the mission on the part of the commanders of the dispatching units, we…

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    educated generals to battle bred, tacticians who were always one step ahead of the enemy in the…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the third day of battle, the Greeks discovered that they had been betrayed. Leonidas, the Spartan leader, chose to fight to the end, knowing that his men could never win this battle, Leonidas allowed soldiers who didn’t…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By 1941, Hitler had taken over the majority of Europe as his aim to takeover all of Eastern Europe was almost complete. However the Soviet Union was yet to be attacked by Germany, and so it was no surprise when Germany broke the Nazi-Soviet Pact as Evan notes that neither Hitler nor Stalin had expected the pact to last for the full 10 years. The Soviet Union was of great significance to Hitler as if the nation could be defeated, it would ensure Germany lebensraum, provide a vast amount of resources and isolate Britain in the war. Therefore Operation Barbarossa was launched and the Soviet Union was invaded on June 22nd, 1941, and yet this was a month later than scheduled due to German actions in the Balkans. This proved to be of crucial importance as although the attack on Russia was immense and used thousands of Axis troops, Germany needed a quick victory. Germany had many early successes, such as the brilliant campaign to capture Kieve in September, and made much progress over an area twice the size of Germany within a month. However despite this, the drive of the German forces had slowed and instead both sides were stopped by a siege. Hitler attempted to break the Soviet…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hermann von Francois was a German General der Infanterie (General of the Infantry) best known for his significance for the many victories on the Eastern Front. Both of his grandfathers served as generals in the Prussian Army and his father was a Prussian general. Francois was the commander of the I Corps of the German Eighth Army and he was to defend against the attacks from the Russians while stationed in the province of East Prussia. In 1914, the war broke out and on August 17th of that year, Maximilian von Prittwitz (German theater commander) commanded Francois to retreat while under attack from the army led by Paul von Rennenkampf (Russian general). Francois was unwilling to give up Prussia and felt that retreating would be deadly. He disobeyed the order he received and responded with the famous reply, “General von Francois will withdraw when he has defeated the Russians!” He continued on by launching an attack on Rennenkampf's army that was uncalled for, but resulted in victory. This battle was called the Battle of Stalluponen.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, I must choose the harder right. I strongly believe that a good officer is one that is not afraid to go that extra mile to ensure the safety and welfare of the soldiers under his command, this is very rarely easier than just doing the minimum. Secondly, a leader must remain calm in all situations. The soldiers under the command of a nervous and indecisive leader will tend to act in the same way, they actually "inherit" some of the traits that their commanding officer portrays, both on the battlefield and in garrison. If a leader even seems indecisive and unsure of him/her self then the soldiers he/she commands will be hesitant about following the orders they are issued, and hesitation on the battlefield does nothing more than cost lives. Next, I'd like to touch on the fact that in the army talent must be promoted. One should not be afraid to promote officers that have greater aptitude than that they possess. If talent had not been promoted, then Sam Damon would not have been able to create such a positive impact on the Army, and a few more soldiers could have lost their lives in combat.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Any reforming of Nazi forces in the east could have been dangerous towards the advancing Russian Army, extended out all over Germany as it tried to quickly advance on Berlin. A Russian force less than 70 miles east of Dresden was very vulnerable to German counterattack (USAF) and the Allied bombing made sure that no German communication or support was possible through Dresden and do not cause a threat for the Russians who were coming into Germany. The bombing of Dresden was the only best way in wiping out the German force and warn the…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the biggest problems facing the Spartan army lay in the fact that each soldier was trained so well that the Spartan army practically consisted only of trained men, leaving them without a commanding officer. Yet, the average soldier was so well drilled and trained that he knew as much about warfare as an officer would have. Such an organisation does not always give the best results on the battlefield. An example of this is the Battle of Plataea (479 B.C.) where the Spartan commander refused to follow the order of the Spartan king, Pausanias, to retreat. At the Battle of Mantineia (362 B.C.), the ptolemarchs at the right wing ignored the orders of the king, as they wanted to win the battle in their own way.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main contributing factors to the German Wehrmacht’s defeat in the USSR…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Untitled Document

    • 567 Words
    • 1 Page

    troops also aided Stalin and his Russian forces by essentially distracting the Germans from the…

    • 567 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russians population was so large that throughout the war even though they lost a lot; the army continuously built their ranks back up. Russian armies could tie up hundreds of thousands of Germans. Germany could not give its full fight force as the west. As the war raged on, fighting spreaded from Europe to Africa, to Southwest and Southeast Asia. (page 415)…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The invading German military caught the Russian army by surprise. The Russians lost many men and equipment, not to mention the entire territory between Poland and Moscow. The Germans were suffering from the climate when new Russian reinforcements counter-attacked near…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Paul is sent back to the front, he has to crawl through No-Man's-Land, an attack begins, he becomes lost, crawls into a hole to play dead, and stabs a French soldier who falls into the hole. This shows how Paul and others during the war are changing from the civilized people they were into savage animals. Paul doesn't even think when he stabs the man, he just strikes madly at home (9.216) like a bear whose territory has been invaded, but it isn't just Paul. If the situation was reversed, the Frenchman would have killed Paul the same way, not thinking, but letting a primitive instinct take control. The war has stripped people of everything, making that primitive instinct come out. It is almost like Paul is possessed, not fully in control of his actions. This war is like a dogfight, innocent dogs fighting with only the high ups profiting. But Paul realizes “that your mothers are just as anxious as ours, and that we have the same fear of death, and the same dying and the same agony”. Paul even asks for forgiveness “Forgive me, comrade; how could you be my enemy?” (223). He is remorseful as “I [he] did not want to kill you[Frenchman]. . . . But you were only an idea to me before, an abstraction that lived in my mind and called forth its appropriate response” (223). This gives hope, that not all humanity is…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper on Leadership will compare the primary differences and characteristics between the tactical leader and the organizational leader. I will provide you with the basics for development, characteristics, and the fundamentals that help guide and influence each leader’s style and how they influence Soldiers to follow them. Leaders at all levels demonstrate their values, knowledge, skills, and abilities in many different means and methods in order to get the mission done. Leaders must set the example, continually teach, and mentor their subordinates by displaying a strong moral character in order to meet the challenges that ensure a safe and secure nation. The Oath that any potential leader takes is to have “strong intellect, physical presence, professional competence, high moral character, and serve as a role model.” (Field Manuel, 6-22, Army Leadership, 2006, p.viii).…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays