Preview

Why Did The Allies Lose Ww2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Allies Lose Ww2
Evan Yau HIS 293 During World War II, the German army seemed unstoppable at the start of the war. They were able to take Poland in just 35 days and invade France with their tactics like blitzkrieg (lightning war). With them having an amazing victory in France over the Allies, causing them to surrender in six weeks, it seemed like there wasn’t much the Allies could do to stop Hitler’s army. However, once Hitler turned his army towards the USSR, we saw that they were able to slow down and eventually defeat. Now it leads to the question of what factors led the Germans to be so unstoppable against the Allies in the east and what factors hindered them in the west. One of the main contributing factors to the German Wehrmacht’s defeat in the USSR …show more content…
However, they pushed the invasions back to June as they needed to provide forces to help Italy with their invasion of Greece, which drastically limited the time they had before winter came. This caused them to be underprepared when invading, as they were not supplied for the Russian winters they were about to encounter, as they once again expected the invasion to be quick and end before winter. This would put the Russians at a greater advantage as the invasion dragged on, as at this time they were well versed in fighting in their territory and conditions, especially in the winter. The Germans were at a disadvantage when invading the Soviets, as not only were they not prepared for their weather, they mainly only had one advantage when invading the Soviets, which was the element of surprise, according to the textbook. This would mean that they would have to be quick with their invasion, as once the element of surprise was over, they would not have anything to their …show more content…
“The Third Reich received important supplies of food and minerals from the USSR” (Mawdsley 112). This meant that when they invaded, they immediately lost the USSR as a supplier, which would’ve meant that the Germans would start to be limited in their supplies, which meant that they would most likely have to ration their supplies out carefully. Now we look to see why the Germans had so much success in the Battle of France. One of the main reasons that the French failed was because they fought the war the same way they fought World War 1, with, as the textbook puts it, a “defensive strategy rather than an offensive one” (Mawdsley 96), which meant that their troops would be slower for defensive reasons as they were not meant to be used offensively, allowing for them to easily be outmaneuvered. Another reason could be the way that the French designed and used their tanks. Mawdsley says that the French focused their strategy and tanks around firepower and centralized control. They also did not recognize how efficiently they could utilize the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The invasion of the USSR in the summer months was that of great confidence and assertiveness that they were on the ‘front foot’ from the German people. During these summer months, the Russians had been pushed back by the Germans to what many thought of as the core of the USSR; Russia. Obviously when the Germans had advanced 20 miles short of the central of the most powerful enemy they’ve faced yet, the German people had a right to be happy with their recent progress in the war. This changed their lives by giving them more confidence in that they felt they could defeat the Russians as they were pushing them back towards the capital.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, the Allies, following the occupation of northern Italy by German troops, were now stuck in a conflict which they though was going to be quickly resolved. This was going to delay the opening of second front against the Germans, which the Soviets were desperate for. However, the Allied invasion of Italy did also bog down the German troops who had to defend the north of Italy against the Allies, therefore siphoning them away from the German eastern front. Though it was not significant, the allies were opening up a miniature, but none the less effective, second front, the effect of which was felt during the Battle of Kursk. When the Germans attacked the bulge which the Army of the Center and South had created, they were able to match the sheer numbers of the Red Army.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Their centralized command system caused a very slow response time during the invasion of Normandy which enabled Allied forces to move ahead despite their own issues. This central control continued to hurt Germany because Hitler would not commit further reserve forces to the battle until it was too late. Germany’s large issue of distrust inside of the political system caused the high command to believe their own intelligence services and therefore did not heed their warning that Normandy would not be a diversion but in fact the main assault. Allied forces proved resilient and innovative as they continued to overcome the metaphorical obstacles that stood in their way.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson did say that all of these reasons accumulated to a French loss. However, Jackson states that the invasion in 1940 was primarily a military defeat. The German tactics, based on the notion of blitzkrieg, were much superior to the French’s doctrine of defense and slow, methodical movement on the battlefield. They found themselves utterly confounded by the speed of German maneuvers, while their men were shocked by the German air attack and armored penetrations. “The main charge is that the French military had not adapted to the idea of mobile warfare and had neglected to possibility of grouping tanks together so that they could be deployed offensively and autonomously rather than playing an infantry support role as in the Great War.”…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Germans had to fight through cold weather, which they were not particularly prepared for, while in Russia during the winter. The Americans at Bastogne had to fight through the cold; they were severely under equipped for it. Another issue both sides had to face was a lack of communication. The Germans had a hell of a time finding their divisions and groups if they got lost or straggled behind a little bit; they also didn’t know a whole lot about what was happening to the groups around them. The Americans had issues reaching each other on many occasions and a notable situation was in the battle on D-Day the 101st airborne division was very disorganized after landing and all the companies go mixed up.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first phase of World War II in Europe, Germany sought to avoid a long war. Germany's strategy was to defeat its opponents in a series of short campaigns. Germany quickly overran much of Europe and was victorious for more than two years by relying on a new military tactic called the "Blitzkrieg" (lightning war). Blitzkrieg tactics required the concentration of offensive weapons (such as tanks, planes, and artillery) along a narrow front. These forces would drive a breach in enemy defenses, permitting armored tank divisions to penetrate rapidly and roam freely behind enemy lines, causing shock and disorganization among the enemy defenses. German air power prevented the enemy from adequately resupplying or redeploying forces and thereby from sending reinforcements to seal breaches in the front. German forces could in turn encircle opposing troops and force surrender. Germany successfully used the Blitzkrieg tactic against Poland (attacked in September 1939), Denmark (April 1940), Norway (April 1940), Belgium (May 1940), the Netherlands (May 1940), Luxembourg (May 1940), France (May 1940), Yugoslavia (April 1941), and Greece (April 1941). Germany did not defeat Great Britain, which was protected from German ground attack by the English Channel and the Royal Navy.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By January of 1943 the German strategic situation had worsened perceptibly. The Russian counter-attack at Stalingrad threatened to engulf all of VIth Army.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    And since he couldn’t get his tanks across, he couldn’t use the method of blitzkrieg (aka lightning warfare). On June 22nd 1941, Soviet Russia had been caught unprepared due to the negligence of Josef Stalin, who had ignored a lot of intelligence reports warning that a Nazi invasion was prominent. In mid-July, many thought that the only thing that was left for Russia was to give up, but the Russians kept fighting. Despite the great loss of men and equipment, the Russians started fanatical resistances, which were unlike anything the Germans had had to deal with in previously in the war. The German and Hitler had majorly underestimated the total fighting strength of the Red Army. Instead of 200 troops, the Russians could field 400 troops when fully mobilized. (This meant there were three million additional Russians available to fight.) Later in the war, Hitler thought the only thing left to do was to take Moscow. But in the end that ended in the bloody defeat of the Germans, and Russia was still standing, having not been taken over by…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were not even trained with the new types of equipment. Germans misinterpreted on how things would be in the east. They dismissed Russia as a strong enemy and did not really think on how they would fight the Russians since they lost to japan in the Russo-Japanese war. The plan in 1914 ignored how Russia had modernized. Unfortunately, after the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated things did not go as planned.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In commencing Operation Barbarossa, the German prerogative was; ‘Provided everything was over quickly’. Hitler had expected complete strategic freedom within five weeks, an outcome which did not require substantial supplies. However, the reality was that supplies were grossly mismatched with the capability and objectives of German infantry and tanks. The subsequent extension of supply lines increased exposure to Russian attack.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the British army remained undefeated in the west, Hitler's goal proved an urgency for him to begin moving on the east. Whilst planning was made throughout 1940 for the invasion of Russia, time was favorable towards the Russians and they continued to mobilize their resources and strengthen their defense forces.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As in Worald War I, Germany 's primary downfall was its lack of adequate allies and a war on multiple fronts. Territorially, Hitler came very close in World War II to achieving his quest for lebensraum yet his failure to concentrate his resources proved disastrous. His lack of time spent organizing the conquered territories resulted in wide spread rebellions which in turn separated German forces. The North African campaign absorbed troops that were much needed on the Russian front. The failure of the V2 rocket in the final stages hindered the German offensives. The Allies combination of well-organized troops, weaponry, resources and a little luck in the closing stages of the war placed pressure on the already weakening Germany. Despite the early successes from Poland to France, the Battle of Britain and the invasion of Russia assured ‘the fatherland ' of a war against the world. A war almost impossible to win.…

    • 2443 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Hitler Lose Ww2

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The sinister brilliance of Adolf Hitler lay in his energy of propaganda and political motivation. In the years paving the way to the beginning of WWII in 1939, Hitler rose in the nation’s political positions, built himself up to Fuhrer, and persuaded the German individuals to a completely Fascist mindset. In spite of these qualities to join together and mobilize the German individuals under his supreme authority, Hitler could not reach victory during the war for Germany for three reasons: economic, diplomacy, and military. He deliberately neglected to prepare the country financially, refused building strong relationships with other nations within Europe, and demonstrated a pitiable military strategy. Since Hitler controlled despotically and singularly, his disappointment would not be remedied by others in Germany, coming full circle in the country's thrashing after World War II.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historians have questioned the factors leading to the end of the Second World War. The allies had greater resources compared to the Axis power, but Germany was dominating even before the World War had begun. Though material comparison was convincing, it was the naive form of analysing the factors. Strategically, Hitler and the rest of the World made mistakes, but some of the strategies prevailed. Evidently through the events of the Second World War, strategy of the two oppositions surface apparent as the most important factor.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Operation Bagration

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages

    At the Tehran Conference, the first World War II conference amongst the Big Three: the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom the final plan to defeat Nazi Germany was agreed upon in unison. As promised at the Tehran Conference at the end of 1943, as the United States revealed the date for their Western offense, the Red Army began planning a powerful offensive to coincide with it. Operation Bagration, the main summer offensive of 1944 carried out by the Soviets on the Eastern front was to overshadow with the allied landing in Normandy set for the 6th of June 1944. (Axell p.97) Its goal was to “recover soviet territory, destroy German forces, liberate other European countries, and conduct strategic operations sequentially rather than simultaneously.” (Connor p. 5) This research paper intends to discuss the often-overlooked importance of Operation Bagration in the demise of the Wehrmacht during the Second World War. I will concentrate on how Soviet military strategy and deception was able to hinder German forces. Moreover I will analyze the extent to which this military setback and demoralization of the German Wehrmacht aided the success of D-day that same month. I hope to bring to light the far-reaching achievements and contributions of this often forgotten operation, and its significance to the ultimate demise of Hitler’s Nazi Germany.…

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays