Who Is Schliemann: A True Liar
There are many effectiveness when reading heinrich schliemann. Because schliemann stol many artifacts when he has trying to discover troy. Many people think he is a thief and a liar. Did you know schliemann was a very rich guy and he di archaeology for fun.
The reason why this article is effective is there are many facts and true statements in the story including why he is a thief and a liar. One of the effects why he is a liar is when he was digging for the city of troy he did not record any of his findings. So he could of stol for the sight and nobody would ever know he stole. In fact schiemann did not even know where to dig for the town but he read lots of articles and he pinpointed about where to go. The article is very effective because …show more content…
The author tries to get people to think bad about schiemann and think he is a thief by using propaganda. The author is putting all the bad things in the article and makes people think schliemann is a liar. The author calls schliemann names that makes schiemann look bad. On proof that the author calls schliemann names is in paragraph 2 the author calls him a liar and a theraf. The author makes the reader think that he is a steeler and a liar.
The author uses logic to make the reader feel like schliemann is a liar and a theraf. In paragraph 3 the author told the people that schliemann stool from the city of troy. But the people of turkey think schliemann stool for the old town of troy and they fined him for stealing from him. The people think schliemann is not an archaeologist because he stole from the sight.
The article is very effective because the author sounds like he knows what he is talking about and he has factual information about the man. In pg 3 the man uses factual information about schieman and the author talks nice the the audience and tells his facts the author shows proof about the man Schliemann stealing from the town troy. In pg 1 he talks nice to the audience and he status his claim on what he is talking about. Therefor the story was very effective on what it was talking about. The author really did his research on the man schliemann because he really known what he was talking about in the story. That what makes the story such a good
The reason why this article is effective is there are many facts and true statements in the story including why he is a thief and a liar. One of the effects why he is a liar is when he was digging for the city of troy he did not record any of his findings. So he could of stol for the sight and nobody would ever know he stole. In fact schiemann did not even know where to dig for the town but he read lots of articles and he pinpointed about where to go. The article is very effective because …show more content…
The author tries to get people to think bad about schiemann and think he is a thief by using propaganda. The author is putting all the bad things in the article and makes people think schliemann is a liar. The author calls schliemann names that makes schiemann look bad. On proof that the author calls schliemann names is in paragraph 2 the author calls him a liar and a theraf. The author makes the reader think that he is a steeler and a liar.
The author uses logic to make the reader feel like schliemann is a liar and a theraf. In paragraph 3 the author told the people that schliemann stool from the city of troy. But the people of turkey think schliemann stool for the old town of troy and they fined him for stealing from him. The people think schliemann is not an archaeologist because he stole from the sight.
The article is very effective because the author sounds like he knows what he is talking about and he has factual information about the man. In pg 3 the man uses factual information about schieman and the author talks nice the the audience and tells his facts the author shows proof about the man Schliemann stealing from the town troy. In pg 1 he talks nice to the audience and he status his claim on what he is talking about. Therefor the story was very effective on what it was talking about. The author really did his research on the man schliemann because he really known what he was talking about in the story. That what makes the story such a good