Freud’s theories, while groundbreaking, are continually under debate. His theories depended on lust and violence being the core of humanity and received great acclaim during his lifetime. However, Huxley was not fond of Freud, as many of his contemporaries were. He took Freud’s theories to the extreme in his novel. By doing this, he pokes fun at the ridiculousness of the time period in which Huxley lived, the 1930’s, that had become so infatuated with Freud and his theories (Saracino, 10). Huxley, being friends with fellow author D.H. Lawrence, whose “passionate engagement with Freudianism, as well as his …show more content…
Here, people live without the restraints of the government of the World State, have their own religion, and have more freedoms than those living in the World State. However, they have the constraints of parents and monogamy and believe in a savage god that needs displays of dedication through self-flagellation.
In the novel, the Oedipus complex and the dangers of having parents is demonstrated through the character John the Savage from one of the Reservations in what was formerly the United States. John, whose mother was a former citizen of the World State and was not used to monogamy or even the concept of parenthood, experiences jealousy and rage towards those who sleep with his mother or have intimate relations with her. He becomes violent, attempting to murder the man his mother sleeps with