Preview

Who Was More of a 'Monster', Frankenstein or His Creation?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Was More of a 'Monster', Frankenstein or His Creation?
One approach to this question would be to say that the creature in 'Frankentein' was himself the only monster. However, as we soon realise, the creature is benevolent at heart and only becomes monstrous due to the unjust way in which society treats him. The bleak, miserable world which Shelley portrays, full of hypocrisy, oppression and prejudice gains exposure through the depiction of the monsters 'fall from grace'. It is through the monsters suffering that he becomes truly monstrous. Shelley is suggesting that the creature's misdeeds are caused by the enormity of his suffering; at heart, he is essentially good. And, more importantly, essentially human. If he is monstrous, no one but Frankenstein is to blame. When the outraged creature demands of his creator, 'How dare you sport thus with life?' the question succinctly represents the sentiments of the reader, and perhaps even of the author as well. Frankenstein, in his hypocrisy, longs to murder a being who owes its life to him. If the creature is, paradoxically, both inherently good and capable of evil, then his creator is as well. The main cause of the monster's suffering rests with none other than Victor Frankenstein himself, whose actions at the monster's birth were surely monstrous also. To desert a newborn child is to defy one of the most fundamental elements of human nature. This shows Victor to be inhumane, and hence, monstrous. It is this inner monstrosity that is reflected in the creature's hideous visage. This exposes one of the novels key themes; Frankenstein is the monster's double. It becomes clear at this point that Shelley is making use both meanings of the word monster. In modern usage, the term 'monster' has come to mean 'something frighteningly unnatural of huge dimensions'. However at the time of 'Frankenstein's' writing its meaning was quite different. In earlier usage a monster is 'someone or something to be shown' Shelley uses both definitions in order to blur the fine line between what is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein, the main character Victor Frankenstein, becomes obsessed with the notion of bringing a human being to life. The result is the creation of a monster only known to us as 'the monster'. The monster is hideous, and is therefore rejected by Victor and by society to fend for himself. He soon commits many murders, as a result of his dejection, including Frankenstein's younger brother, best friend and newly wed wife. He also set up the killing of Justine. Frankenstein created the monster and then rejected him, but it was the monster who actually did the killings, who was to blame.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein creating the monster starts off bad and it only goes even further downhill from there. What the monster does throughout the story is very unethical and not very moral, but its actions can be explained by learning about what Victor did to create the mess. When he created the monster and then left it, he put everyone who was close to him in danger and never owned up to the fact that it was his fault. He let innocent people die because of this and when he could have explained that he created the monster, he decided to stay silent. The bad ethics are even further displayed through secondary characters who judge the monster based on social norms and its looks. In a book of unethical and unmoral events, Shelley decided to place in an ethical and moral character: Robert Walton. He is the epitome of a great man based on his actions. This book was filled with unethical decisions that could have been prevented if the monster was never…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Frankenstein, the Monster adopted a crime and hate filled life mainly because of his interactions with humans. This is a reflection of Mary Shelley's views on human nature. While Mary Shelley was writing the book, she believed that humans are mutable, and that what they become is based off of events that occur in their lives, and decisions they make during their lifetime, and the Monster is a perfect example of this; he starts out innocent, but the abandonment from Victor Frankenstein, and the harsh treatment from people turned the Monster into an angry being.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romantic era took place throughout the 19th century and held the belief that men demonstrate innate goodness, but civilization later corrupts them. Even in today’s society, many political figures, authors, celebrities, and athletes reinforce the Romantic idea of the natural goodness of man and the corruption of man by civilization as they initially exhibit pure values that succumb to the temptations civilization provides. Literature also reflects the belief of the innate goodness of man and the corruption of man by society. For example, Mary Shelley, entails these Romantic beliefs in her novel Frankenstein, in which both Victor Frankenstein and the Creature are born innately good but society later corrupts them. Victor’s,…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shelley wants the reader to feel compassion for creature as well as for Frankenstein. She writes as though she is trying to distinguish the idea of a good or bad in a person. In her biography, written and research by the European Graduate School Program, that she is atheist and you can really tell that by reading the novel. Things such as morals and ethics can be easily leaned not only by attending the church but merely social interactions and self-education. I think that this is shown through the creature in how he is so neglected but continues to persevere and gain his own knowledge and wisdom through his sensations and passions. Mary Shelley created something more than just a…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates a creature to which he immediately abhors and detests. Frankenstein believes he is responsible for the monster’s well being, however, he states that his duty to his fellow man was more important: “My duties towards the being of my own species had greater claims to my attention because they included a greater proportion of happiness or misery” (Shelly p.207). He ran from his home leaving the creature alone to fend for himself in the world of man. Those who see the beast immediately find hatred towards it and lash out. This continues until the being finds refuge in the forests. It is here he finds a haven from man, as well as a family living in…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    frankenstein essay

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankenstein's Monster is a tangible representation of evil being created. Humans are solely responsible for the evidence of evil, primarily based off how they treat each other. Originally, the Monster embodies a childlike naivety which causes him to be completely unaware of his status as "an abhorred monster" (Shelley 92). Completely isolated from society, the Monster still develops a sense of self awareness which leads to the revelation of his loneliness. Desperate to cure his emotional pain, the Monster observes a family from afar and envies their happiness and connectedness. Eventually, he "hoped to meet the beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding" (Shelley 196), and receive companionship and love from his ideal future friends. At this point, the Monster is clearly not evil, rather just an innocent being seeking the same validation that most humans strive to find.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Frankenstein, the role of the monster and human are subtly revered with Victor considered more monstrous than the creature he created. This is because first, Victor is portrayed monstrous than the creature because he abandons his creature instead of educating and friendly introducing him to the world, which is itself a monstrous act of irresponsibility. Secondly, Victor ought to know that the creature will likely harm others, but due to his selfishness he places his family and friends at great risk. Some might say that Victor is not monstrous and disagree with the fact that he only wants creature to be killed, because he agreed to the creature that he will make the female form of the creature to fulfill the creature’s need and for his family’s…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The monster of Frankenstein was denied the opportunity to be good. Frankenstein’s monster was resentful towards everyone because of his father, Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein created the monster and ran away immediately after he came to life. In the novel written by Mary Shelley, Frankenstein says, “I took refuge in the court-yard belonging to the house which I inhabited; where I remained during the rest of the night…catching and fearing each sound as if it were to announce the approach of the demoniacal corpse to which I had so miserably given life” (614). When he ran away, it made the monster spite him. The monster became angry that his father, the man that created him, didn’t want him anymore and was afraid of him. The monster stalks the De Lacy family, eager to learn from them. One day he decides to go inside and talk to the old, blind De Lacy man, the other family members come…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isolation In Frankenstein

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the novel Frankenstein, many people view the creation as the monster, which on the surface is what we are seeing by reading this text. However, as pointed out by writer Josh Traynelis, by reading into the text and digging out the small details provided in the reading, people begin to believe that maybe the creator is in fact the one that deserves to be called the monster. As pointed out in “Who’s the Real Monster?” by Traynelis, “Instead it was the extreme misconceptions of humans, resulting in extreme isolation of the creature, that caused him to become a monster,” where the isolation of the creature mainly draws back to the rejection of the creator and mankind (Traynelis, 1). The creator seemed to be disappointed with his creation,…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Destiny was too potent, and her immutable laws had decreed my utter and terrible destruction” is the monster’s destiny to be evil? Mary Shelley wrote “Frankenstien” which she later published in 1818. The novel was based on a crazy scientist who saw lighting strike before his eyes. This gave him an idea that he can bring someone back to life. He spent many years creating this creature! Later after creating this creature he abandeed him causing the monster to seek revenenge. The monster did this by killin of victor’s family. could society and abandoment cause the monster to act out ? does society play an important role in the monster life? Is the monster heart broken or just looking for love? Does society make you evil or are you just born evil?…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As humans, we have certain distinct traits that allow us to differentiate amongst others. While all humans have different attributes, they all share a common trait, and in this case, it is considered to be ‘revenge’. Revenge is “the action of hurting or harming someone in return for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands.” Throughout the course of the novel, Shelley showed us that revenge comes from one’s core; it is a trait found mostly within people who have faced some sort of betrayal from a loved one, in this case, a ‘parent’ or its ‘child’. Both parties, Frankenstein and the creature, have betrayed one another severely; and both persons were obsessed with the concept of avenging the other.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The monster, although it has acquired the name Frankenstein in popular culture, remains nameless throughout the novel, signifying its lack of acceptance in a human society. The monster’s rejection stems significantly from its appearance, ranging from its "yellow skin" (Shelley 42) and "dim-white sockets" (42) to its "straight black lips” (42) and a "shriveled complexion” (42). Shelley has clearly distinguished the monster, marking the first divide between monster and human. She has also established the initial trickling of the monster’s inability to associate with humans. In fact, the monster’s own creator, Victor Frankenstein, rejects it due to its appearance and refuses to interact with the hideous beast. The monster’s appearance prevents other characters from seriously interacting with the monster, as they form a prejudice against a non-human being. The fear of that which is non-human lingers throughout Shelley’s…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who was the real monster in the book Frankenstein? In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, we see the main character, Victor, create a being out of body parts and bring it to life. Over the course of a couple years, this experiment dramatically changes the course of Victor’s life. His creature was not as he intended it to be, so he hated it. Shelley uses Romantic and Enlightenment thought in her horror novel to explain and demonstrate the different emotions of her character. In Frankenstein, Victor is unable to successfully “mother” his creation the way he had envisioned it because he never learned to truly care for others.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays