Preview

Why Did Garner's Trial Fail

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Garner's Trial Fail
were they to be exploited solely for ks benefit the lawyer never forgot to mention that they were dealing only with junior officials, which meant officials who were dependent on others, and the taken n each trial could be important for their own furtherment. could it be that they were making use of the lawyer to turn trial.. in a certain diretion. which wold, of course, always be at the cost of the defendant it certainly did not mean that they would do that in every trial, that was not likely at all, and there were probably also trials where they gave the lawyer advantages and all the room he needed to turn it in the direction he wanted, as it would also be to their advantage to keep his reputation intact. if that really was their relationship, …show more content…
in short, he no longer had any choice whether he would acept the trial or turn it down, he was in the middle of it and had to defend himself if he was tired, then that was bad but there was no reason to worry too much before he needed to he had been capable of working himsell up to his high position in the bank in a relatively short time and to retain it with respect from everyone, now he simply had to apply some of the talents that had made that possible for him to the trial, and there was no doubt that it had to turn out well. the most important thing, if something was to be achieved, was to reject in advance any idea that he mite be in any way guilty. there was no gilt. the trial was nothing but a big piece of business, just like he had already concluded to the benefit of the bank many times, a piece of business that concealed many …show more content…
seen in this way, there was no choice but to take his repreentation away from the lawyer very soon, at best that very evening the lawyer had told him, as he talked to him, that that was something unheard of and would probably do him a great deal of harm, but could not tolerate any impediment to his efforts where his trial was concerned, and these impediments were probably caused by the lawyer himsell but once he had shaken off the lawyer the documents would need to be submitted straight away and, if possule, he would need to see to it that they were being dealt with every day it would of course not be enough, if that was to be done, for to sit in the corridor with his hat uder the bench like the others. day after dag, he himself, or one of the women or somebody else on his behall, would have to run after the officials and force them to sit at their desks and study ks documents instead of looking out on the corridor through the grating. there could be no let up in these efforts, everything old need to be organised and supervised, reaching the terrace above, one which appeared more time worn and dangerous than that upon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Pre-Trial Conference 10. Service of Process 11. Summons 12. Verdict 13. Voir Dire Dean’s List #3 – Trial Procedures…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the lawyer does not have a sound moral character, he may not defend his client as well. If James Holmes gets life in prison instead of the death penalty the lawyer would have done his job and justice would have been served even if the…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V. Garner

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a "prowler inside call." When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out "police, halt." The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also "figured" that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department's policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner's fathers' argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm's Review Board and presented to a grand jury of the Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals. Neither of these presentations of the incident took any action.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question #4. Why do lawyers in civil litigation rely upon the members of a legal team?…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur glanced up as the jury members took their seats. Next, the plaintiffs associated with the lawsuit filed into the galley, followed by onlookers, which meant Judge Valdis would enter at any moment. She was fair, but firm and kept strict order in her courtroom, which Arthur appreciated. She did not tolerate showboating or grandstanding.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those that have not been exposed to a jury trial might be rather shocked how to process works, not only in criminal matters but also in civil matters as in the case…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The case of James Hardy Vaux serves as a prime example of the inefficiency and weakness in the British justice system, especially in terms of punishment. It is significant in highlighting how ineffective trials were at convicting criminals. Over his criminal career, he was trialled 4 times, and eventually transported for life. His 3rd trial is perhaps the most significant in providing an outlook on the inefficiency of the trialling system. Vaux had stolen a silver snuff box out of the pocket of a gentleman in a theatre. After leaving it with the landlady of a public house to have it refilled, he was caught picking it up again, along with the scissors he used to slit the gentleman’s pocket in his possession. Despite the large amount of evidence against him, he was found not guilty by the jury, thanks to the tactics he employed to avoid a sentence. He dressed very expensively, and acted gentlemanly, and paid for the best lawyer he could find. He swayed the jury with his demeanour. Such was common at this time, for a criminal to sway the public, bribe witnesses and even threaten the prosecutor. After 1000 trials at the Old Bailey in 1793, 562 were…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During this paper I am going to be covering topics such as the courtroom work groups, the role of a prosecutor, the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the court system and the courtroom work group. Topics such as these are important to cover so that each individual has a complete understanding of the pros and cons of systems in the judicial system.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DISSCUSSION: Justice Sutherland delivered the opinion of the court. They said “a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice.” The court also determined that the defendants were not “defendants were not accorded the right of counsel in any substantial sense”. When the court appointed the members of the bar from the area he knowingly denied the defendants their right to counsel. Paired with the poor indefinite charge to get the defendants counsel with their…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 16th and 17th century, the law did not allow or provide for the use of attorneys in any court case, except for treason cases. It wasn’t until the 18th century in which the defendants were allowed to have an attorney. The constitution allowed for the use of attorneys, but most defendants represented themselves, while…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though this view is only put across by roberston , only his side of the story , this is his oppion and view on the legal system and by putting across as untrustworthy view of the legal system he avokes the responder to ask questions. His metaphor or descrbing the legal system “ the justice game” is reinforced in this chapter, the continuance bounce for staire irony ridicule. He consentialy is belittling other members of the court, making judgments and sterotypes for the audince to relate to and create an oppion on. ROberstion wants us to believe that the legal system is a game and that you should only really be in it if you have to , there is no right or wrong you see as the wrong can be agrued and one to be the truth again. Our once trustworthy view on law is manipulated by roberston, taking us to believe maybe we shouldn’t always believe what we see or hear BUT HOW DOES HE DO THAT…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The author will determine courtroom groups, how the groups interact daily, and recommend changes to the groups. The author will also describe prosecutor roles and the cases he pursues. Finally, the author will elaborate on the funnel of criminal justice with the backlog among the courtroom group, the court system, give an example, and explain how to eliminate backlog cases.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He acted as the leader for the people who believed the defendant was guilty. He, like the Architect, is a natural born leader. He loudly argued his opinions about the case and refused to back down from his stance. Even in the end when he was completely out numbered he fought for his belief despite the persuasion of others. He couldn't care less what they thought of him. He was there to do his job and wouldn't be easily influenced by others.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On first arriving to the Crown Court I immediately felt a feeling of anxiety, almost as if I was about to stand trial myself. This led me to a moment of reflection on how those around me, the family of those awaiting trial and in some cases those awaiting trial themselves must be feeling. Many anxious faces sat around…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial draws on a rather bleak image of humanity the crime in question is first degree murder most serious charge tried in our courtroom’ the victim is not portrayed as innocent but as a ‘tough, cruel, primitive kind of man’ the lawyers on the case too are described as not doing their job properly and lacking the motivation to investigate the possibilities…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics