Preview

Why Did Joseph E. Brown Win The Civil War?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1687 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Joseph E. Brown Win The Civil War?
Unlike many of the Civil War governors who were elected in and out of office while the war was in full swing, Joseph E. Brown served as the governor of Georgia throughout the entire Civil War era, from 1857 to 1865. His influence, thus, is broad, ranging from the conflicts leading up to the war and the secession of the southern states to the defeat of the Confederacy. His voice, which continuously advocated for states’ rights, called first for the secession of the southern states out of the Union and then, in turn, resisted against the Confederacy, opposing the Confederate draft. Brown’s extreme zeal for the principle of states’ rights was undoubtedly the principle over which the Civil War was fought, but in all practicality, he regarded that …show more content…
The biggest topic of this term was the upcoming presidential election of 1860. Lincoln, a Republican of the north, was seen as the most likely winner of the election. Forecasting undesirable consequences of Lincoln’s triumph in the presidential race, Brown set forth some emergency actions that were clearly a push and preparation for Georgia’s secession. He set a date for a convention on secession on January 2, 1861, and he requested $1,000,000 for military preparation. Furthermore, after Lincoln’s victory in the presidential race but before his inauguration, Brown wrote an open letter to the citizens of Georgia, in which he advocated secession. He laid out the following three points for discussion in his letter: the significance of Lincoln’s election to the White House, the effect his administration would have upon the institution of slavery, and finally the impact the abolishment of slavery would have upon the nonslaveholders and the poor white laborers of Georgia. He explained to Georgians that Lincoln alone was not sufficient cause for succession, but it was what his victory represented that was the main concern. Lincoln was “representative of a fanatical abolitionist sentiment…the principles of which are deadly hostile to the institution of slavery and openly at war with the fundamental doctrines of the Constitution.” Brown argued that Lincoln and his administration would result in “the total abolition of …show more content…
Brown greatly shared the enthusiasm. When Jefferson Davis was elected President of the Confederacy, Brown even assured him that he would be the last man in Georgia to attempt to create any rift with in the Confederacy. But that changed as the Civil War progressed and Brown got into his third and fourth term as governor. Brown and Davis started clashing on many areas. Those areas ranged from questions of jurisdiction of state or Confederate jurisdiction of troops to the funding of the Confederate army. Davis and his administration argued that the Confederacy required more power if they were to have any chance against the united effort of the northern states, but Brown obstinately maintained that any effort for the Confederacy to gain power that would superimpose over the powers of the states went against the founding belief that the Confederacy was born out

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglass, John C. Breckinridge, and John Bell were the four candidates of the election. Lincoln had two years earlier beaten Douglass to the Senatorial seat, and now he tried to beat him again with the Presidential Election. The Democratic Party was split, so they decided on two cadidates which were Breckinridge and Douglass. The Constitutional Union chose Bell, and the Republicans had Lincoln. With his campaign revolving around westward expansion and abolition, Lincoln did not get very many supporters. The people of the country more so wanted Douglass. With only 40% of the entire country's votes Lincoln won the presidency. Douglass came in second with ~30%, Breckinridge ended third with ~20%, and Bell rounded out the four in las place with only about 13%. Lincoln, the sectional president, had not been elected for four days when South Carolina seceded. The blame rested on Buchanan's shoulders, for he was the president still until March 1861. This was ultimately the cause for disunion. During the election, or rather the time of campaigning, South Carolina had stated that if Lincoln was elected they would secede; and they went through with their word. Sectionalist tensions has risen to a peak and cracked under pressure. The Missouri Compromise was no longer available to be a scapegoat, and neither were the other political controversies. The Union's last leg to stand on was kicked out from under it. It would take several more months until the actual war started; however, by this point it is clearly inevitable. Political compromise was out of the question, and by then it was only a matter of time before the first shots were…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author also observes that Lincoln’s moderation in attitude continued to influence his presidency through the Civil War. He believed that calming nonconformist ideas and restoring legal authority throughout the nation were his main objectives. Foner displays his opinion in saying that in the early stages of war abolition wasn’t a priority for Lincoln, but a bargain that encouraged the reunification of the United States. As well as avoiding the slavery question, the President was enticing the border states with offers of reimbursed emancipation. Foner puts emphasis on the fact that as Lincoln's perspective on the pending issues change, his view adopted a new position that were previously held by abolitionists and Radical…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially John Brown was viewed as an irrational for his actions in Pottawatomie, Kansas. It was in Pottawatomie where Brown and a few colleagues took violent measures of vengeance against five pro-slavery southerners in Response to the Bleeding Kansas crisis. The northern view of Brown changed however after his 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry, Virginia. The northern people did not immediately view him as a hero however. Many northerners viewed his raid as “utterly mistaken and, in its direct consequences, pernicious”. (Doc A) Southern people viewed Brown’s raid as a commotion and an appeal to rebellion. The previous Bleeding Kansas crisis also pushed the south more towards succession. “It was by delegates chosen by the several states… that the Constitution of the United States was framed in 1787 and submitted to the several states for ratification… that of a compact between independent states.” (Doc H) President Lincoln responded “Having never been States, either in substance, or in name, outside of the Union, whence this magical omnipotence of ‘States Rights’, asserting a claim of power to lawfully destroy the Union itself?” (Doc I). Both of these statements were made in 1861, and clearly represent the division that sent our nation to…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (J.E.B) Stuart the Civil War America’s transformation into the country we live in today has been formed through numerous events during its history but the event that will split the United States into North versus South is truly one of the most defining events. Through different issues leading up to the start of the Civil War, the United States was destined for conflict and that the Civil War was inevitable. The Civil War was a very rough time for the U.S , many people lost lives but at the end of the day the only lives that were being lost where the ones of our own people. Many different generals and army official had to take a strong incentive to pursue victory in the war against Union. James Ewell Brown Stuart represents…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln had been convinced by the Republican leaders that he would lose the November election. After reading Raymond Beaks letter, Lincoln decided to write his message, which was a note pledging his dedication to helping the new president win the war. Lincoln had been devoted to the cause of emancipation, regardless of the criticism over the policy. He viewed slavery as evil and wanted it removed throughout the nation.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fitzhugh and Helper were both “zealous propagandists” whose work “added to the certainty of an irrepressible conflict.” There was a reason that Southern states were quick to secede following the election of Abraham Lincoln. The growing spread of abolitionism, they feared, would destroy their way of life. With both camps talking past each other, there was an absolute refusal of southern whites to consider any change in the economic structure. Many slave owners clearly believed in a Northern conspiracy, seeing only dark machinations.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown's Raid DBQ

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many different views and ideas about John Brown flew around the North before the Civil War. Debates and arguments sprung up about whether Brown’s actions and means could or should be justified. Some agreed only partially with Brown. Document A proves that with Horace Greeley’s statement “And, while we heartily wish every slave in the world would run away from his master tomorrow and never be retaken, we should not feel justified in entering a slave state to incite them to do so, even if we were sure to succeed in the enterprise.” Greeley is merely saying that he approves of Browns means but not his violent way of going about accomplishing those means.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although initially the Northern press expressed deep sympathy for Brown, saying that “we would be glad to avert the axe which hangs over the old man's head”, the impending secession crisis and the coming presidential election of 1860 required Northern press to be very careful with their political opinions. At that moment, the North’s chief political endeavor was to prevent rather than hastening Southern states from seceding. In one of its editorials, Chicago’s Press and Tribune characterized this raid as a “fanaticism action” and stated sincerely that “as long as we are a part of the Union, supporting the constitution and the laws”, Old Brown was answerable for the “legal consequence of his act”(2). The Northern newspaper had done their best to calm the slaveholders down and persuade them to stay in the…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document H, President Davis’s message to southern confederate shows that the constitution doesn’t include information on the idea of separate and independent states, and is unable to prevent “the rise and growth” of states. Due to this reason and many others, there was nothing in the Constitution that was unable to stop the southern states from succeeding from the union. Furthermore, the constitution also contains amendments that gives states powers not explicitly expressed in the constitution, contributing to their succession and the justification of slavery. Document H is bias because President Davis is the president of the southern states that succeeded from the union, therefore is pro-slavery and a states rights advocate. Additionally, in Document I, Lincoln’s message to congress shows that the succession was done in logical order and there is not much in the constition that provides Lincoln with the power to prevent the succession. However, there is nothing that gives the southern states greater power than the northern states, especially the power to “lawfully destroy the union itself.” Lincoln’s message is bias towards the southern states because he was a president elected on anti-slavery in the new territories and many views, contrary to those of the south, which cause him to condemn their act of succession. Lastly, Document B, Emerson’s address on The Fugitive Slave Act blatantly asserted that the union is unable to remain unified, if an immoral law is enacted. This statement truly shows that the constitution became a source of sectional discord and tension, contributing to the failure of the…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were several Union war strategies and tactics that were used to win the war. The Union war strategies and tactics from 1861-1865 were derived from policy objectives. The war’s primary objective was simply the reoccupation of the government installations seized from the Union. So, their main goal was to basically reconcile and restore the Union. In order to successfully do this, the Union had to invade the Confederacy.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 27, 1858, there was an argument called the “Lincoln-Douglas Debate.” Lincoln said, “I confess I would be exceedingly glad to see Congress abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, and, in the language of Henry Clay, "sweep from our capital that foul blot upon our nation."” (Lincoln 1). This is proof he was against slavery. In this debate, he speaks on his beliefs on the Fugitive Slave Law, the end of slave trade throughout states, and the abolition of slavery in D.C.(District Columbia). Two years later, he was elected the 16th president of the U.S., which was the start of the civil war.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Brown Beliefs

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Brown’s beliefs about slavery and activities to destroy it hardly represented the mainstream views of northern society in the years leading up to the Civil War. This rather unique man, however, has become central to an understanding and in some cases misunderstandings about the origins of the Civil War. Brown felt strongly about slavery being an abomination due to his religious upbringings. As a result, he advocated for the use of violence to eradicate the system. Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry further fueled the Southern belief regarding majority of Northerners being radical abolitionists.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the election of Abraham Lincoln and the succession of the south occurred, Republicans would seek national prominence. John Brown was condemned and slavery would be accepted in society where it existed. Abraham Lincoln was a nominee to become president of the United States but there was one thing that he did not want to exist anymore and that was slavery in the west. Southern democrats wanted to protect slavery within the states and Democrats could not decide as Democrats only had 3…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1860 Turning Point

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The presidential election of 1860, followed by secession in the south was a major turning point in American history and was actually the beginning of what came to be known as the Civil War. The year prior to the election, John Brown, an abolitionist raided Harpers Ferry, Virginia, trying to get the slaves to stand up to their masters. It was a failed attempt, and John Brown got convicted of treason and later on was hanged. Because of this raid, the south saw him as a criminal due to the fact that the south felt they needed slaves. The north however, viewed him as a martyr.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Debated

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Thomas R.R. Cobb Delivered his speech in Milledgeville on November 12, 1860 and the night before in Athens. Thomas was a very well educated man and served as a longtime clerk on the Georgia Supreme Court. He wrote many books on Georgia Laws and Supreme Court Manuals. He also wrote a book called Law of Negro Slavery which highlighted his practice of restraint, control and puritanical Christianity views. Clearly he was a secessionist being a faithful Georgia man however his speech isn’t all fire and war. He promoted control rebellion with specific reasons as to why secession is a viable option. In his speech he focuses on the effort of the northern states and frequently condemns Personal Liberty Laws.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays