Preview

Why Did The Union War Strategies To Win The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Union War Strategies To Win The Civil War
There were several Union war strategies and tactics that were used to win the war. The Union war strategies and tactics from 1861-1865 were derived from policy objectives. The war’s primary objective was simply the reoccupation of the government installations seized from the Union. So, their main goal was to basically reconcile and restore the Union. In order to successfully do this, the Union had to invade the Confederacy. However, President Lincoln promised that “the utmost care will be observed, consistently with the objects aforesaid, to avoid any devastation, any destruction of, or interference with, property, or any disturbance of peaceful citizens in any part of the country.” (Pg. 11-12) However, the Union strategically shifted their main objective to the emancipation of slaves as the war went on.
There were several debates in the
…show more content…
In forming their ideas about warfare the Union used experience from previous wars to shape their strategy moving forward. Federal commanders looked primarily to three major conflicts: the War for American Independence, the Napoleonic Wars, and the War with Mexico. Together those struggles constituted the basic model of expectations for what should transpire in military operations. In addition, each example seemed to suggest, for different reasons, that successful war making should concentrate on the battlefield. They provided little indication that a hard war strategy was either required or efficacious. (Pg. 17) The commanders primarily wanted to affect the Southern soldiers and not the general population. Moreover, going off of historical war experiences, the union did not want to use guerrilla tactics against the south due to the inhumanity that it would cause and the harm that could be given to the civilian populist. The Union wanted a traditional British war and only wanted to target the Confederate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    14. The South's strategy was to defend the homelands and to hold on to as much land as possible until the North gets tired.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    civil war study guide

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    U.S. General-in-Chief Winfield Scott’s plan to defeat the Confederacy: blockade the southern and eastern coasts, seize control of the Mississippi River so as to break the Confederacy in two, and then strike…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The war (Civil War) between the North and South was a major war that included more than 100,000 troops. North and South had to turn to their neighboring countries to find more men willing to fight with them. Both started to developed strategic plans. The south wanted their independence and the North wanted to preserve their Union. Believing that a time for negotiating has passed Lincoln believed the North had to physically conquer the Confederates to gain control of the South.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 4, 1861, when Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated into the presidency, he gave a speech that would express his desire to resolve the sectional tensions without warfare. He held this position because he felt he didn’t have the right to interfere with the South’s state rights, and by extension, their system of slavery. Unfortunately for Lincoln, the growing conflict between the North and the South wouldn’t be stopped and the Union entered the Civil War with the seceded Confederate states of the South in the second month of his presidency. As the war raged on and the damage it had on the Union was revealed, Lincoln decided the protecting the Union was more important than maintaining the Southern state’s rights. One of the first actions Lincoln…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.” Lincoln is mentoring others views about slavery but says that he is willing to reunite the Union even if slaves are freed or not. Linonlcs main property is the war at hand, then he promises to do something about slavery.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Another reason the South well fell short of a victory was the obvious difference in population between the South and the North. The North at the time had twenty-two million men while the South had a meager nine-and-a-half million, of whom three-and-a-half million were slaves. While the slaves could be used to support the war effort through work on the plantations, in industries and as teamsters and pioneers with the army, they were not used as a combat arm in the war to any extent. This cuts the South's manpower by a third, leaving a fifteen-and-a-half million difference in the population of the two areas. Give the South fifteen-and-a-half million more possible soldiers, and the outcome would have been different.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political goal was to drag out the Civil War long enough, so that the North would recognize that fighting was not a good plan and recognize their sovereignty as a nation. Strategically speaking the South did not have any large scale coordinated attacks unlike their opponents from the North (late in the war). Moreover, individual commanders like General Lee developed their own plans like Lee’s offensive and defensive strategy, but the political decisions were dictated by Jefferson Davis. By and Large, the leadership of the Civil War, on both sides, was dominated by West Point education, and Jefferson Davis was no…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of us know the outcome of the Civil War even though it was fought over 150 years ago. Yet, even though we know the North won the Civil War, the reason for the win is not obvious. First, the Union was able to out maneuver the Confederacy because of the strong Navy. In spite of having a better home field advantage, the South was unable to contend with naval bases, vessels and access to waterways located in the North. Additionally, the Union’s Navy kept the Southern seaports and the Mississippi blocked, choking any hopes they had of shipping or receiving goods from Europe and adversely affecting the economy.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War, a pivotal moment in American history, presented both advantages and disadvantages to both the North and South. On one hand, it provided an opportunity for each side to assert its ideals and values, but on the other, it brought about immense loss and devastation. As the Civil War began, the North held several strategic advantages that positioned it favorably. Firstly, the Union's industrial capacity far surpassed that of the Confederacy, enabling the North to produce “weapons, ammunition, and other war materials in abundance” (courses.lumenlearning.com). This industrial might was complemented by a more extensive and efficient railroad network, facilitating the rapid movement of troops and supplies.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warfare was a “hit and run” tactic that the confederacy used as an attack. For our generals we had General Ulysses Grant. He made the North surrender and helped us win the war. Their army was very unified or together and all of the soldiers stuck together during this war. These soldiers were very skilled and knew where they were going on their turf since they did have the home field advantage.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gettysburg Turning Point

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The aim of the union was to defeat the confederate army of Northern Virginias and safeguard Washington. After horrid losses by the component, the army were determined to besiege both cities, the army forced their evacuation and Lees retreat. Mission wise, Confederates had an advantage as they had already occupied 75,000s square miles which made it difficult for the Union to Blockade, inhabit and defeat. The confederates did not require attacking the North but just guard thus the Union was left with no choice but to attack. Equipment-…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But all similarities ended there because both sides wanted a different way of life preserved. Confederacy had a goal in mind that was to secure independence from the North and “to establish independent nations free from Northern political oppression and the repression of slavery” (Olson-Raymer). The War from beginning to end became an icon for everyone during this period, either they moved forward with life as a whole together with freedom for everyone or they retained their old ways and kept freedom as a privilege for those who have it. This was firmly believed that the Constitution protected slavery, but the Union had seen a better way for this to work, a way without the need for slavery and for a way for everyone to live together. Southerners, therefore, had the right to do what they believed as it was the only way to defend their right to own slaves and their belief in states' rights to do what they believe.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union held numerous advantages over the Confederacy at the start of the American Civil War. However, these advantages are hard to discern by merely looking at events, for the Union was unable to achieve victory for a full four years and suffered numerous defeats in the early years of the war. While the Civil War is well known for improving the civil rights of African Americans and ending slavery, it also holds other lessons in military strategy, lessons that still are apparent in the modern day world. Only through Generals Ulysses S. Grant, William Tecumseh Sherman, and David Hunter’s innovative strategy of total war was the Union able to exploit its advantages and bring the war to a close.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    April 12, 1861 marked the beginning of the Civil War when shots were fired at Fort Sumter, February 17, 1865 Fort Sumter and Charleston were abandoned by Confederate troops. Sherman’s troops were in enemy territory, the plan always was to wreak havoc in order to expedite the conclusion of the war, especially in South Carolina, which initiated secession. Morally speaking it was a necessary evil to end the bloodshed, the warring of one nation, and return peace to the country and the families it separated, it provided closure to one of the darkest moments in American history. Valueless Confederate money was burned as if it were firewood, rations were scarce and what was available was pathetic, Confederates states were unwilling to aid one another due to a mindset of pro state government versus anti federal government, the Confederacy was falling apart, and Sherman gave it the final push it needed. Total war was an effort for peace, which required “make[ing] war so terrible… and make them so sick of war that generations would pass away before they would again appeal to it.” It was a debated idea Sherman would either succeed and leave behind a legacy of brilliance, or be written off as a foolish military…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil war was a long, drawn out conflict, which acted as the climax for the 19th century. Between April 12th of 1861 to May 9th of 1865 - 5 whole years - The union, led by Abraham Lincoln fought the Confederates, led by Jefferson Davis. The Union eventually won the war by more or less starving the confederates. Nicknamed “the anaconda plan” the Union blockaded Confederate ports to hinder trade as well as keep their navy in check. Next, the Union took the Mississippi river in order to split the confederate states in half thereby ending needed communication between states.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays