Preview

Why Did The South Enter The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The South Enter The Civil War
The Civil War, a pivotal moment in American history, presented both advantages and disadvantages to both the North and South. On one hand, it provided an opportunity for each side to assert its ideals and values, but on the other, it brought about immense loss and devastation. As the Civil War began, the North held several strategic advantages that positioned it favorably. Firstly, the Union's industrial capacity far surpassed that of the Confederacy, enabling the North to produce “weapons, ammunition, and other war materials in abundance” (courses.lumenlearning.com). This industrial might was complemented by a more extensive and efficient railroad network, facilitating the rapid movement of troops and supplies. Additionally, the North had …show more content…
The Confederacy's primary strength lay in its military leadership, with experienced and skilled generals like Robert E. Lee and Thomas Jackson commanding their forces. Additionally, Southern soldiers were often highly motivated, fighting to defend their homes and way of life, which fostered strong morale and a deep commitment to the cause. Lastly, the South also had the advantage of fighting on familiar terrain, which allowed for better strategic use of the landscape and local resources. The Confederacy hoped that their “cotton exports would garner support from European powers like Britain and France,” (ushistory.org), potentially leading to diplomatic recognition and aid. Although the North did have many advantages, they also had many disadvantages against the South. Union forces often fought on Southern territory, where they were less familiar with the local geography. This lack of familiarity sometimes led to strategic and tactical disadvantages, as Confederate forces could use their knowledge of the terrain to their advantage. At the start of the war, the North struggled with inconsistent and sometimes ineffective military …show more content…
The South did have many more disadvantages throughout the war compared to the North. The South lacked the industrial capacity of the North, resulting in shortages of weapons, ammunition, and other essential supplies. This industrial inferiority made it “difficult for the Confederacy to sustain a long-term war effort and adequately equip its soldiers.”(thomas.k12.ga.us) The Southern transportation network was less developed than that of the North, with fewer railroads and less efficient logistical support. This limitation restricted the Confederacy's ability to move troops and supplies quickly, leading to strategic disadvantages. The South had a smaller population than the North, limiting the number of soldiers and laborers available for the war effort. This demographic disadvantage became increasingly significant as the war dragged on and federate losses mounted. Ultimately, the North’s victory in the Civil War can be credited to many factors. The North's advantages in industrial capacity, population, and economic strength proved decisive in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The South did have some advantages though. Several Indian tribes joined the Confederacy, and the Union troops would have to move in and conquer the land, then force it to be a part of the Union again. They also had more talented military leaders than the North. But the North had more men, most of the railroads, and they controlled the sea. The government of the North was well established, and functioned with little difficulty in comparison to the new and hastily made government in the South. Both sides had disadvantages as well. The South began to run out of supplies, they did not have a major transportation system, and they had a weak economy. Some of their troops refused to fight outside their own states. The North’s disadvantages were the men being unprepared for military life, and poor choice of commanders.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at the civil war, it is pretty obvious that the North had the upper hand. After all, they won the Civil War. One of the most significant advantages that the Union possessed was better technology than the South. The use of technology played a great role in the Union’s victory. A few of these advantages were the construction of railroads, more artillery, and the use of pontoon bridges.…

    • 376 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The union was more industrialized and better equipped to make products that were made of iron like railroads and ships which was a big advantage for the north. The union could easily transport goods and soldiers compared to the confederacy. The confederacy had a hard time to feed and clothe their soldiers because they little railroads. The north had another advantage…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Few advantages in the South were able to fight on it large homeland, they had best military leaders, they encouraged young males to serve in the army and military school. They even export cotton, rice, sugar cane and tobacco for the money. The North held many advantages over the South, there were more resource and population. The Northern states had a twenty-two million of the…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South began the civil war with a bleak outset, their only hope being their skilled generals and the stance of a defensive war, but despite what historians may say it was the North that underestimated the South. Prior to the start of the war the obvious winner would be the North for they held the most ascendancy in the splitting nation. The North contained seventy percent of the country’s railroads which gave them the lead in the swiftness to travel. Troops, supplies, and weapons could be sent within days instead of weeks, but more importantly information could be received faster and acted upon quickly. Factories were also a benefactor that the North had; factories produced the guns and ships that were a priority to the war efforts.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why and how the North have the advantage in the Civil War? The North had an advantage over the South in many fields, including its population, industrial and agricultural capacity, and transportation network. Half of the men of military age fought for the Union in the North, around 2.1 million were supplemented by Irish, German immigrants and African Americans who most of them were ex-slaves from the South. In the South, 90 percent of the men eligible to fight and fought for the Confederacy in the South were around 900000.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When both the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South) entered into war with each other, neither side was thoroughly prepared for battle. Both the North and the South had issues gathering enough resources and raising funds to support their war efforts (Goldberg, ed. 7, The American Journey, 405). However, the Union did have an advantage over the Confederacy. The North had a large population, strong political and military leadership, and plentiful resources; while the South struggled to piece together an entirely new government and army. This early upper-hand by the Union was what helped them eventually wear down the Southern troops at the end of the war and win.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The North outgunned and it had more people than the South. During the Civil war the North had a little over 20 states apart of the union and the South had half that. the South had only 11 states. Out of the 2 million troops the North had 350,000 died during the war. the North went under the name of the union they were against owning slaves.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their strategy was to survive, own nation, provide Europe with cotton, and get United Kingdom to side. They followed the three ruled which were to wear them down, keep moral high and keep their army together as one. Their advantages were that they knew the land, had better generals, and they were more enthusiastic about the fight. But the disadvantage was that they lacked industrial goods and products, but most importantly they lacked people. The north had about 620,924 people while the south had 154,910 people.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrial economy, transportation systems, and population were all significant aspects in the North’s victory over the South in the Civil War. The Confederacy lacked the necessities needed to win the war and was no match for the innovative North. The North had all the key resources needed to win the war making it nearly impossible to be defeated by…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays