Preview

Why did Lenin adapt Marx stage theory?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did Lenin adapt Marx stage theory?
Why did Lenin adapt Marx Stage Theory?

There are many reasons why Lenin adapted Marx stage theory. A vital motive was that Lenin longed for the communism foreshadowed in the Marx stage theory. However, in 1917 Russia was an underdeveloped country that had barely left feudalism. Therefore, in order to adopt the idyllic communist society, Russia would still have to drag through two Marxist stages (capitalism and socialism), which could potentially take centuries. After living in a feudalist society dominated by inequality and extreme poverty Lenin was determined to see a fair communist Russia.

Moreover, Marxism claimed that Russia must go through a capitalist stage before it could progress to a socialist society, which would bring Russia a step closer to communism. Nonetheless, Lenin believed that the middle classes in Russia were not strong enough to carry through a bourgeoisies-democratic revolution, which would create capitalism. The Russian bourgeoisie and middle class liberals had come onto the stage of history too late and would not play the same revolutionary role in the struggle against feudal absolutism as the French bourgeoisie. They feared the emerging working class too much. Lenin understood that if he were to live to see a communist Russia he would have to adapt Marxism, by boycotting capitalism and proceeding to an amalgamation of the bourgeoisies, and socialist revolution lead by a small group of elite revolutionaries whose purpose was to create class consciousness of workers.

Finally, in 1917 Russia was in chaos. The First World War had been raging for two and a half years. Over 1,700,000 military personnel had been butchered because they were badly prepared by the old feudalist government. Russia was continuously losing territory, and the war had sparked food shortages through out the country. Economically Russia was devastated; 8,000,000,000 roubles in war debts were outstanding, strangling the national economy of its breath. Inflation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    had very smart and tactical aims and objectives and ideas of what was best for Russia.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The immense cost of the war led to dramatic price inflation in Russia; by the end of 1916 were four times those of 1914. Wages rose more slowly than prices, and this lag contributed to the revival of strikes in the capital at the end of 1916. Food supply was an additional problem, which led to an outbreak out of rioting and strikes in Petrograd and spread to other parts of Russia. This caused the first revolution of 1917, where on March 15th the Tsar was forced to abdicate from power and authority passed to a provisional government, made up of members of the Duma.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many consequences from the Bolshevik revolution. Farmland was distributed among farmers, and factories are given to workers. The banks were nationalized and a national council was assembled to run the economy. Russia pulled out of World War I, signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, conceding lots of land to Germany. Civil war, between Bolshevik (“red”) and anti-Bolshevik (“white”) forces, sweeps Russia from 1918 to 1920. Around 15 million die in conflict and the famine. The Russian economy is in shambles. Industrial production drops, trade all but ceases, and skilled workers flee the country. Despite the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 1917, the Russian economy was in poor shape and near complete destruction because of the war effort. Food shortages were rampant which brought about civil unrest.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin and Robespierre viewed revolutionary leadership in very different ways. Lenin was concerned with creating an organization and strategy that would show the political independence of the working class. He would have not cared what country he was doing it just that it was done somewhere so the world could have an example. Robespierre was absolutely a nationalist, everything he did he was doing for the good of France. He did not care about the workers or any other country.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Russia had endured many more hardships and downfalls following the conclusion of World War I. According to The Making of the West, “the government’s incompetence and Nicholas II’s stubborn resistance to change had made the war even worse in Russia than elsewhere” (Hunt et al. 683). The. In the early revolution in February, the monarchy was overthrown and a provisional government was put into place, however it failed to meet all the desires of the working class and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Karl Marx and his developed theory of Marxism played a vital role in influencing Lenin’s efforts to overthrow the Provisional Government eventually leading to the Russian Revolution of 1917.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s economy suffered worse during the war than most of the other participants due to its underdeveloped Industrial sector. Eventually, the toll on the Russian economy and quality of life caused the Russian people to rebel against Czar Nicholas II and a revolution took place in 1917. When Vladimir Lenin of the Bolsheviks came to power, he withdrew Russia from the war in order to begin ameliorating working conditions and quality of life, but before he could begin stabilizing the economic and political climate in Russia, a Civil War broke out. Ultimately, the Bolshevik regime won the war and Russia emerged as the Soviet Union: the first communist country in…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February 1917, there was a mass rebellion lead by woman and workers that created the end of the tsar and reign of the provisional government, which granted them equal rights (Roberts 257). Not too long after, in October, another revolution occurred in which Lenin and the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government. This revolution eventually lead to the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which ended Russia’s participation in WWI (Roberts 258). The signing of this lead to a huge downfall in the economy of Russia. They had lost land to Germany, including ¾ of their coal industry, their manufacturing output was down to 1/5 of what it had been pre-war, Europe had hit a period of starvation in the winter 1918 (Roberts 267), and in 1921…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx believed that capitalism contained the seeds of its own destruction. He described how the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the work of the proletariat. Therefore, capitalism requires an underclass. But Marx predicted that the continued exploitation of this underclass would create great resentment. Eventually the proletariat would lead a revolution against the bourgeoisie.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War 1 Russia Values

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Once the Czar abdicated, the people no longer felt like they had to answer to anyone. There were many flaws in Russian government, and structure at the time of World War 1. The Czar, Nicholas II, was extremely unpopular with the citizens. (See appendix data for picture of Czar Nicholas II. Figure 1). Even before the war, there was a large gap between the rich and the poor. The people felt disconnected, and did not believe that Nicholas II genuinely cared about them. The fact that the Czar, who had no knowledge of war tactics, took over the Russian army only made matters worse. The army was badly led and poorly equipped. All problems were blamed on Nicholas II. 15 million men were forced from their jobs at farms and train stations, resulting in food shortages, and higher process (Smele). The winter of 1916-1917 was severe to the point that there was a famine in some cities. On March 8th, there were many riots regarding the food shortages, and war in general. Four days later, March 12th, most of the army itself abandoned the…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays