Preview

Why Did Rousseau Believe that Modern Society Was Corrupt and Unfree?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Rousseau Believe that Modern Society Was Corrupt and Unfree?
One of the most important writers of the Enlightenment was the philosopher and novelist Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778). The work of Rousseau has influenced a generation and beyond and it is argued that the main ideals of the French and American revolutions arose from his works, for example The Discourse on Equality. The main concept of Rousseau's thought is that of 'liberty', and his belief that modern society forced humans to give up their independence, making everyday life corrupt and unfree. One of the central problems Rousseau confronted is best summed up in the first line of arguably his most important work, The Social Contract.

'Man is born free but everywhere in chains'1

This quote is an expression of Rousseau's belief that humans are corrupted by modern day society. Rousseau says that the state is unjust and corrupt and is dominated by the rich and the powerful. While the poor only know oppression and unhappiness, these aristocrats use it selfishly to further their own interests. The modern state deprives human beings of their natural freedom and promotes self-centred individualism that undermines equality and concern for the common good.22

According to Rousseau the modern state and the accumulation of human knowledge, improved human understanding but corrupted the human species morally. In his works A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (1755) and A Discourse on the Arts and Sciences (1751), Rousseau questioned advances in knowledge and rejected the glorification of reason that was central to the outlook of the philosophers. The philosophers, he believed, had given people better reasoning but had destroyed them morally. The price paid for cultural and intellectual progress was the moral decline of the individual, a condition that could no longer be endured.3

Rousseau drew up sharp, contrasting characteristics between the 'civilized and societal man' and the 'natural and savage man', natural man being the individual prior to the creation of civil

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s key viewpoint is that all men are born free, but end up being in chains everywhere in the course of their lives (Rousseau and Cole 2 ). Rousseau argues that modern political states repress the basic freedoms which men possess as their birthright. These political states then lead men into the civil society in which the civil freedoms of men are not secure. Most importantly, Rousseau points out that the legitimacy of political authority can only be a product of social that all citizens agree upon motivated by the need for mutual preservation. Throughout the book, Rousseau makes key distinctions that make the basis of the discussions in this essay.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Declaration of Independence,” written by Thomas Jefferson, is a statement adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776. “The Origin of Civil Society” is an article written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Jefferson writes about human rights because all men shall be equal and free; Rousseau writes about social contracts because by understanding the concepts of social contracts, the people will live with better security and significance. By analyzing these two articles, readers can see how important it is for a writer to understand the concepts from previous generation of writers, how much Rousseau’s ideas have influenced Jefferson’s statement, and how Jefferson has expanded Rousseau’s concepts.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacque Rousseau was a prize winning essay writer who would later become an inspiration to many others. During a time of inspiration, he realized that “Human beings in a state of nature were compassionate and good; it was society itself that was to blame for creating inequality, greed, and aggression,” (382). Many of Rousseau’s published works espoused radical views that government should rest with the will of the people and equality for all human beings. Rousseau’s autobiography entitled Confessions, “help to revolutionize notions of what a life was and what it meant,” (385). Rousseau’s autobiography was an intimate look at the author’s emotional life. He bared his soul, talking about all aspects of his life, from the sexual pleasure that he received from getting a spanking to an emotional relationship he had with a teacher who was influential in his life.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The enlightenment era, can be said, produced some of the most critical ideas that clearly impacted the development of democracy. This intellectual period that roughly lasted from the 17th to the 18th century is responsible for producing some of the most brilliant political philosophers. Amongst these philosophers and philosophes were political revolutionaries such as Voltaire, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Cesare Baccaria, Baron de Montesquieu, David Hume, and John Locke. The ideas they promoted and would later be adopted by flourishing democracies included the individual’s freedom of expression and religion by Voltaire, the separation of powers and checks and balances by Montesquieu, rights in the field of criminal justice by Baccaria, federalism by David Hume, and the idea of natural rights by John Locke. One of the most critical enlightenment ideas that contributed greatly to the understanding of the role of government was Rousseau’s social contract. This idea was viewed and generally accepted by many contemporary philosophers and seen as genuine and practical. According to Rousseau, legitimate political authority comes only from a Social Contract agreed upon by all citizens for their mutual preservation. The collective grouping of all citizens, or the “sovereign” he states, expresses the general will that aims for the common good. Thomas Paine further explains this point in his essay Rights of man (1791) by writing that government is not a compact between those who govern and those who are governed, but instead it is a compact between the individuals themselves to produce a government.1 According to both, the general will finds its clearest expression in the general and abstract laws of the state2. Furthermore John Locke viewed the Social Contract as a form of giving legitimacy to a government only through the consent of those whom it governs and that the objective of the government is to protect the individual’s natural rights. Paine further explains that a…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man is no longer himself rather he has conformed to society which he has described as a powerful and restrictive system. Rousseau believes that is man would have never gained knowledge from the arts and sciences, then they would not have the false values and motives or behave in such barbaric ways. He especially focuses on the idea of politeness. He claims that this is merely a societal norm because behind it, people are actually just lying frauds and that arts and science is to blame because it has corrupted out minds. He positively correlates the knowledge of the arts and sciences with the corruption of…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man never progresses because he lacks the ability to solve problems. By taking step aback, Rousseau is not assuming that humans were once solitary, whereas in Hobbes’ version, people did have social interaction, but only government was absent. However, in absence of reason, humans do have emotions like pity, which helps them live in harmony. With everything well balanced, savages are happy within themselves, making inequality hardly noticeable. Even though he thinks that the state of nature never existed and never will, Rousseau’s preference for the savage human over civilized human is fascinating because this implies that Rousseau does not want the humans to develop. However, when we look at the modern society, humans are oppressed at every moment in contrast to the state of nature. Today, as Lincoln said, democracy is defined as for the people, by the people and of the people. Is the power really in people’s hands? Or are they politically enslaved by the leaders they voted to represent them? As Rousseau says, laws are just made by the rich, here political leaders, to secure their power and position, keeping the weak, the citizens, in the illusion of…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussions brought up by thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau encouraged the political revolutionaries in the development of the birth of the rights of a man, beliefs of equality, freedoms, and liberalism. Along with it came the arrival of the “self-made” man, referring to the embracing of liberty of the individual and accepting radical views, creating another conflict with the values upheld by the monarchy.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau, J.-J., Wootton, D. and Cress, D. (2012) Basic Political Writings: Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on Political Economy, on the Social Contract, the State of War. 2nd edn. Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains." said Jean Jacques Rousseau. He believed that if we live based on the "good will" , liberty and equality will become part of our life. The beliefs he had were that only under the good will could we find our best form and take full advantage of ourselves. Rousseau also supported education, in his work Emile he said “The more ingenious our apparatus, the coarser and more unskillful are our senses.” by these he tells us we are ignorant and that education makes us smarter and wiser.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a French philosopher who wrote The Social Contract. He believed that men in the state of nature is blessed with an enviable total freedom. He believed in two types of freedom, freedom from need, and being physically free. He also believed that the government should work for a common good. In The Social Contract Rousseau wrote “Every man being having been born free and master of himself, no one else may under pretext whatever subject him without his consent. To assert that the son of a slave is born a slave is to assert that he is not born a…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right Thing Theory

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My personal views coincide with those of the author for this week’s essay prompt, who praises the practicality of Locke’s theories while renouncing the overtly idealistic ones of Rousseau. I agree with the author’s analysis that Locke’s theory holds more merit and is more persuasive than Rousseau’s. The author of the excerpt makes a compelling argument that Rousseau’s theory of human nature is naive and not applicable to reality. Rousseau's theories are inapplicable to reality because they are far too idealistic and fail to acknowledge the self-interested aspect of human nature. The argument from the essay prompt is a strong analysis of the philosophers because it effectively uses a personal anecdote to support Locke’s theory that a desire…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays