Preview

Why did stalin becom leader after lenin, not trotsky?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why did stalin becom leader after lenin, not trotsky?
In the beginning, as Lenin end grew nearer, there were five potential leaders, Bukharin, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Trotsky and Stalin. It seemed so obvious that there only was one man to take over Lenin's reign - Trotsky. He was Lenin's right hand man, but a close second was Stalin. People saw him as the one who came second, that's all he was; there was no way that he would beat Trotsky in the race for leadership, but what they didn't know that Stalin's cunning would overtake then all and he would end up being the leader of Russia.

Stalin knew he would have to worry about the other three, as separate candidates. Trotsky was his main rival. Stalin made Lenin's funeral the centre stage for his plotting. First he tricked Trotsky into turning up to Lenin's funeral on a wrong later date. By not turning up, Trotsky's reputation was damaged. Stalin also used Lenin's funeral to make himself look better by organising the actually funeral, making it look like he should be the one to carry on Lenin's work.

Krupskaya gave Lenin's secret testament to the Central Committee, but Zinoviev and Kamenev didn't it let become public knowledge as not only did it show Stalin as a bad leader, but also Zinoviev and Kamenev didn't look too good in the testament. In addition, they didn't see Stalin as much of a threat and thought they could use him to help defeat Trotsky, who was seen as very good in Lenin's testament.

Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin were at the height of the race at the moment. At this moment Trotsky criticised the party calling it too bureaucratic and less democratic. In 1924, Zinoviev and Kamenev built up a ferocious campaign against Trotsky, which questioned his loyalty to Lenin and criticised him about the 1917 revolution, in which he was a bit unwilling to support Lenin's actions. During this time, Stalin thought wisely and stayed in the background.

It wasn't until 1925, when Stalin introduced his "Socialism in One Country" policy, where he wanted to concentrate on Russia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the lead up to Lenin’s death and the years that followed, it would seem Stalin was in a weaker position than several of his opponents, as many doubted his role in the Revolution and, therefore, his role as a leader of the Party. Several factors played a role in allowing Stalin to be victorious, however, comparatively they hold varying significance. Despite the odds appearing to be stacked against him, Stalin’s ruthless personality and devious strategies allowed him to tactfully defeat his opponents, by manipulating his position within the Party, without having any real party appeal or Government powerbase and he ultimately emerged as leader of the Party in 1929, ending the leadership struggle.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The personality of those involved in the power struggle should however not be disregarded as they played a role in Stalin’s ensuing victory. Stalin was known to some members of his party as the grey blur as supposedly there was nothing remarkable about him. His role in the October revolution and the Russian civil war was minimal however his true aptitude lay in administrative positions, his skill in the clerical field was so great that Lenin came to rely on Stalin’s administrative capability and loyalty. Even so when Lenin became ill Stalin began to oppose him. Lenin’s testament was highly critical of Stalin and encouraged that he be removed, however as the testament was never made public this was never carried out. The fact that Stalin was not seen as threat and was underestimated by his peers meant that he was able to gain authority without raising the suspicions of other party members.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As well as this, after Lenin's death, Stalin wanted to employ a policy of ‘Socialism in One Country’. This meant that he wanted socialism in only the USSR. This again differed from Marxist ideas as it went against internationalism. It was also in contrast with Trotsky, who wanted a ‘Permanent Revolution’ across the world. The main reason Stalin did this was to agree with Lenin’s ideas, as he was trying to appear to be the natural successor to Lenin.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The big issues with the struggle for power was that after Lenin’s death the following leader was not selected by Lenin in his testament, this was because of the different personalities of each of the leaders and the places within the party. The most outstanding reason why there was a struggle for power. This was between all the political positions, left winged, right wing and central, this is due to the varied beliefs of each candidate. The main candidates that was most likely to take power included; Trotsky, who was renowned for his large input in the civil war being a big leader of the red army. Stalin who was high up in the party and was a very conniving, as well as devious person. This was because of his tactical manoeuvring that had taken place during the struggle for power. Lastly there was Bukharin who was also a big contender as he was close friends with Lenin and helped seize Moscow in the civil war. Two more contenders Zinoviev and Kamenev where also large contenders, I haven’t considered them as the biggest contenders for the power of Russia due to their political positioning within the parties as they went from Right to Left winged and therefore were seen as unreliable by the public.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main decisions made by Trotsky which helped Stalin to become Lenin’s successor was his failure to publish Lenin’s testament, which highlighted Lenin’s concern about Stalin and his warning to not allow Stalin to come into power. His decision was influenced by other members of the left wing such as Zinoviev and Kaminov who also supported the concealment of the testament as it revealed their lack of involvement in the October 1917 revolution. Neither Trotsky nor his fellow party members saw Stalin as a threat so the decision to conceal the will appeared to cause no problems.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Lenin’s death was relatively expected, there was still a lot of confusion over who would succeed him to lead the USSR. There are a number of reasons to why this occurred but there are still disputes about who Lenin wanted to succeed him and why he didn’t leave someone who he thought would be best for the job in charge of his beloved USSR.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was not just his popular policies that saw Stalin replace Lenin as the leader of the USSR. It was also partly due to the mistakes and weaknesses made by the other leading Bolsheviks such as Trotsky. Trotsky was seen as too powerful because he was the leader…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after Lenin’s rule there was a fight for power between Trotsky and Stalin. In the end, Stalin prevailed and earned leadership of the Soviet Union during the mid-1920s. However, once Stalin came to power, the lives of the society changed dramatically. Stalin’s wished to restore society which caused him to reverse Lenin’s previous work. Stalin revoked many laws concerning women’s emancipation because he wanted to strengthen tradition and build up the population.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1917, Russia was ruled by Tsar Nicolas II until the Bolshevik party overthrew the Russian government by storming the palace in October commanded by Stalin, Lenin, and Trotsky. The Tsar family, which had been crueling dictating for centuries, was finally overthrown which lead to the creation of U.S.S.R. or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In 1992, Stalin was became the general secretary of the Committee, but he isolated the other party members by betraying and manipulating them out of office including his arch-enemy Trotsky, who was eventually exiled in 1929, and became the uncontested leader of Soviet Union. This Union was founded on the protection of the working class and everyone worked together to make the country great.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin had a grip on Russia and had enough power to change the entire country. Lenin appointed Stalin for the first Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of this investigation is: “To what extent was Leon trotsky more valuable to the Bolsheviks and the Russian Revolution, rather than Vladimir Lenin, his superior?”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays