Preview

Why Did The 1981 Springboks Tour Significant To Apartheid In South Africa?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The 1981 Springboks Tour Significant To Apartheid In South Africa?
The 1981 Springboks Tour was significant to Apartheid in South Africa (Political) as it was one of the main events that ended apartheid in South Africa. After the 1981 tour, the All Blacks were planned to tour South Africa in 1985, but the New Zealand protesters re mobilised against the New Zealand government and the tour was cancelled. An unauthorised All blacks team did tour in 1986, under the name The New Zealand Cavaliers. The tour was given the name, the rebel tour. New Zealand, thereafter, made a decision not to authorise a rugby team to South Africa until the end of apartheid in South Africa. This then put a lot of pressure on South Africa, as no rugby teams were touring South Africa. During the 1981 tour, the protesters in Hamilton …show more content…
There was extensive segregation of the races in South Africa. Daniel Malan, the leader of the National party, made the policy, when he became leader, of apartheid. The aim was to divide the races in South Africa. Apartheid in afrikaan is apartness. This policy had a significant impact on New Zealand rugby, as there was a large proportion of Maori players in the team. Maori players in the All Blacks were not allow to tour South Africa until 1970. Before 1970, there were lots of petitions and protests against the New Zealand government, for not allowing Maori players to tour South Africa. In 1966, Keith Holyoake was the first Prime Minister to insist that Maori be included in future All Blacks teams to South Africa. This was a significant event because the leader of New Zealand was speaking for the Maori public. In 1968, the United Nations called for a sporting boycott against the South African government. Rugby and cricket were the two main sports played by white South Africans, so New Zealand was going to get involved, as we are the best team in one (Rugby) and have a good team for the other (Cricket). We were obviously more likely to get involved with the sport of rugby. A decade before the 1981 tour, former Prime Minister Norman Kirk predicted that a tour by South Africa, in New Zealand, will result in the ‘greatest eruption of violence this country has ever

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Their leader Shaka had planted all his ideas and teachings into the Zulu people and because of him, they had this fearless persona about them to. All they were known for was wreaking havoc and growing their already growing empires with trained a killer, which was going to be a problem. I resented the British Laws that was passed to abolish slavery. If they never passed these laws things would have never changed and this would have never stroked their already growing egos. These laws caused us Boers to revolt and try to escape British rule. This was one of the key opponents that lead us into battle with the Zulu people. These ignorant, blood-thirsty, man slaying, people are dangerous. They start countless wars and make a lot of enemies which would hurt them because they were creating countless enemies. The only thing that they know how to do is how to kill and to start war amongst themselves, when we were trying to compromise with them. We was only trying to teach these barbaric people some of our ways and to civilize them, trying to help the blacks of the South Africa. All the “Great” King of The Zulu Land had to do was disband his military and recognize Britain’s authority, or face invasion. As usual they chose what they knew how to do best, which was how to start war. The same British people that passed the slave abolishing law for these people they were now going into war with them. So not only did they have wars with Boers they also had war with the British now to, how ironic. Even though I despise these people they were very courageous. It’s almost funny how the Zulu’s thought they could defeat us with their sticks. They knew that they could not have stopped us with their assegai which was basically a spear, while we…

    • 619 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because New Zealand was considered part of the Western-Capitalistic running world means that we have similar ideologies to the democracy that runs in the United States of America. The people’s of these nations would’ve realised that this was hugely significant as it was the height of the cold war. With the US being the one of the major powers, people looked up to it for guidance and stability. But when the most powerful man in that economy was assassinated by someone of ‘little importance’, NZ people started to wonder how could somebody so insignificant to society kill someone so important. This is what most deeply affected some New Zealanders.…

    • 2431 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The years somewhere around 1951 and 1960 were difficult times, both for South Africa and for the ANC. More youthful anti-apartheid activists, including Mandela, were going to the perspective that peaceful exhibits against apartheid did not work, since they permitted the South African government to react with violence against Africans. In spite of the fact that Mandela was prepared to attempt each technique to get rid of apartheid peacefully, he started to feel that peaceful resistance would not change conditions at…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of the film, Clint Eastwood shows how separated black and white people are and how they do not get along, due to the change of the government and the Springboks. Because of the change in government, Nelson Mandela’s staff started to pack their things up as if they were leaving their jobs, but Nelson Mandela stops them and says, ‘The past is the past, we look to the future now.’ Nelson Mandela has noticed the struggle between the two sides of the nation, and is willing to make a change. The nation is very separated at the beginning of the film, and Nelson Mandela thought rugby would be able to bring the two sides back together. To do this, Clint Eastwood made the start of the movie seem as if most South Africans did not like the Springboks and to make it seem like there would be some difficulty in bringing the nation together through the Springboks. Nelson Mandela said that, while he is in prison, he would cheer for any team who were versing the Springboks, encouraging the fact that South Africans did not like them. The Springboks were not liked at the beginning of the film because people thought that they still represented discrimination. An example of this happened during the film when the church is giving out some clothes to children. One child is handed a Springbok jersey but he turns it down and runs away, due to the chance of other children beating him up. After the child is gone, the ladies in the church say,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite laws in place to prevent racism arising again in South Africa many of the people still have long held internal prejudices that lead to discrimination (Harris, 2016). Apartheid allowed the white minority population of South Africa to be completely dominant over the black African population, including, but not limited to; the ability to uproot and move South Africans from their homes, complete segregation, making interracial marriage illegal, and not allowing different races to live together. These government sanctioned discriminatory practices were protested by South Africans, most notably Nelson Mandela, a leader in the anti-apartheid movement. Despite cover-up attempts by the “Club of 10”, eventually the South African government began to face consequences for their violations of human rights (Harris, 2016). South Africa was “…expelled from the United Nations in 1974, the Olympic Games in 1976, and in 1986, the U.S. Congress banned new investment by U.S. companies in South Africa” (Harris, 2016).…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australia has a long, rich history of organized sport, though not one of purity and freedom from belligerent intolerance. Organised sport may be seen to have been a positive influence in the eradication of racism in Australia, elevating the demographic that has been so marginalized and improving their perception in the eyes of mainstream society.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do think the natives of South Africa feel when the whites came to South Africa, took over and made them fourth class citizens, made an unjustifiable system that only whites benefit from, and made Afrikaans the official language? Mark Mathabane is the author of Kaffir Boy and grew up as an unprivileged black boy in the Apartheid system. South Africa is controlled by the white minority and has been that way for most of the 20th century (the 1900s) and the main problem was Apartheid. Apartheid is a system made for blacks to flounder and for only whites to profit from and Mark has advantages through this system even though he is black by learning different languages such as Afrikaans and English. Afrikaans is a language that originated from the African continent that whites use and force onto blacks. Mark’s ability to learn and to speak several languages gave him power within the Apartheid system by learning Afrikaans, English and Tribal languages.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700s the Europeans traveled to Aotearoa, the land of the long white cloud, and met the Māori who then traded and taught them their ways. The Europeans arrived in 1769 when captain Cook arrived in New Zealand and spoke to the Māori. This essay will argue that the arrival of the Europeans had a negative effect. The Māori population almost halved because of the Europeans.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Globally, Africa is known as the broke and destitute continent it is portrayed as. However, has anyone ever considered what or who might have caused all of this? Throughout history, Europe has raped Africa of its natural resources, riches, people before and during colonisation but never held responsible for the current state Africa is in. European colonization is rarely taught about in school because apparently slavery is the only horrible thing that Europeans did and not how colonization severely damaged Africa’s society, economy, and environment. So isn’t it time to finally talk about how colonization ruined Africa?…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the age of 24 he joined the ANC (African National Congress), it was a “group that sought to establish social and political rights for blacks in South Africa” (Nelson Mandela par. 3). Mandela and his close friend Sisulu founded the “ANC Youth League”. This group just like Marther Luther King Jr. did nonviolent protest to get there point across the government. Because of this many protester were beaten by police and jailed for defying South Africa’s government, this include Mandela as well. After he was release he continue on with his campaign even though he was forbidden to from attend or doing public speaking. Things got worse after the death of 69 protesters who were unarmed were killed by police. The horrific massacre made Mandela decide…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    South Africa have gone a long way to get where it is now. South Africa used to be a British colony, and then there was apartheid. After that, Nelson Mandela came and helped shape the country into what it is now. I am now going to describe this journey from slaves to modern society.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To a certain extent, international communities such as the United States supported Apartheid cause of the Cold War. The United States wanted to contain communism from spreading throughout the world but in 3 December 1989 the Cold War ended which resulted in the withdrawal of American supported for the South African government. Liberation movements in South Africa were no longer considered as a communist threat by the South African government.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intolerance towards indigenous people is typical colonial societies. European colonists settled in New Zealand justified their exploitation and enslavement as culturing and civilizing native people which were regarded as uncivilized people by European colonists (mainly British people). In New Zealand, Māori, as individuals and communities, were the subject of racism and discrimination when Europeans immigrants (Pakeha) first came to New Zealand (“Ethic and religious intolerance”). Maori gave the initial welcome which was “soon strained as more and more of the arrivals began to ignore Maori jurisdiction and act as if they were a law unto themselves” (Treaty of Waitangi Questions and Answers 9).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Apartheid, Rugby symbolized the divide between white and black South Africans. The South African Springbocks was a team made up of only white Afrikaners, and its fans were also white Afrikaners. Black South Africans would go to the Springbock games and cheer for the opponents. It would give the blacks satisfaction seeing the whites, who harshly mistreated them, get beaten. After apartheid, Nelson Mandela changed the symbol of Rugby from separation to unification. A black player was added to the team, and Mandela encouraged black South Africans to support the team they once booed. He had his country host the Rugby World Cup which unified South Africa because the Afrikaners and Black South Africans came together with a common goal, to win the World Cup.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apartheid in South Africa

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Apartheid was developed after World War II by the Afrikaner- dominated National Party. By definition Apartheid is a system of racial segregation. The National Party (NP) governments enforced Apartheid, through legislation, in South Africa from 1948 to 1994. This new legislation classified inhabitants into four racial groups: black, white, coloured and Indian. (The Indian and coloured groups were further divided into several sub-classifications.) Through the Apartheid policy, “the government segregated education, medical care, beaches, and other public services, and provided black people with services inferior to those of white people.”…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays