Preview

Why Did The Electoral College Lose The Popular Vote?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
850 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did The Electoral College Lose The Popular Vote?
The Constitution specifies that the President of the United States is officially elected by the votes cast by a group of people known as the Electoral College, and not by the popular vote, which are the votes directly cast by each voter. When Americans vote in November and mark their choices for President and Vice President, these citizens are actually voting for electors—people who represent our choices in the Electoral College. Although every elected official in the United States, from school committee members to U.S. senators, is elected based on the popular vote, in order to be elected, the President and Vice President must receive a minimum of 270 votes from the Electoral College.

Although Jefferson had written in the Declaration of
…show more content…
Five Presidents to date have lost the popular vote but ended up winning the electoral college. This happened to John Quincy Adams (1824), Rutherford B. Hayes (1876), Benjamin Harrison (1888), George W. Bush (2000), and most recently, Donald Trump (2016). This brings up the question of to what extent has the Electoral College accurately represented the popular vote in American elections? The electoral college was originally created because most of the nation’s founders were actually rather afraid of democracy. In addition to Jefferson and Gerry, James Madison worried about what he called “factions,” which he defined as groups of citizens who have a common interest that would either violate the rights of other citizens or would harm the nation as a whole. Other members of the founding fathers agreed. James Madison said that southern states “could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes.” Madison was referring the infamous “three-fifths compromise,” which allowed the South to count each black slave as three-fifths of a person. Madison, and others who agreed, wanted to keep power within the white upper class. These men did not want the popular vote to be the deciding factor because after slaves were given the right to vote the tide could turn and shift balance of power within America. This is where the electoral college keeps all power in the white upper …show more content…
Using electors instead of the popular vote was intended to safeguard against uninformed or uneducated voters by putting the final decision in the hands of electors most likely to possess the information necessary to make the best decision; to prevent states with larger populations from having a heavy influence; and to compromise between electing the president by popular vote and letting Congress choose the president. The Electoral College ensures that all parts of the country are involved in selecting the President of the United States. If the election solely used the popular vote then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions. To win the election, presidential candidates need electoral votes from multiple regions and therefore they build campaign platforms with a national focus. The Electoral College also makes sure that the president is elected. It ensures that there could never be a tie between the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Presidential Leadership and the Electoral College. Americans expect their presidents to get things done, to solve problems, to govern effectively, and to be strong leaders. The framers of the Constitution did not envision such presidential leadership. A scholar of the presidency points out that Article II of the Constitution gives the president scant formal power to influence congressional policy-making (Simon, n.d.). He also notes that the framers intentionally designed a process for selecting presidents that would minimize their political power – the Electoral College. They hoped this institution would insulate the chief executive from the public because they feared the power of presidents who might be elected by the people. Therefore, the Constitution provides that “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress…” Having state legislatures “appoint” the Electors who select the chief executive would minimize the president’s capacity to lead on the basis of his popular support. In a very real sense, the president would not be accountable to the people but rather to the state legislatures who appoint Electors. This procedure was also seen as a way to encourage the selection of statesmen with “characters preeminent for ability and virtue” rather than mere politicians with “talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity” (Hamilton, 1788).…

    • 7672 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proponents for the Electoral College to remain the same argue that the Electoral College contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, enhances the status of minority interests, contributes to the political stability of the country by encouraging a two-party system, and maintains a federal system of government and representation. They argue it contributes to the unification of the country because without the Electoral College system, the most populous states would hold all the power in selecting the president and the small states would not matter. With the Electoral College, every state matters in selecting the president. The Electoral College also enhances the status of minority interests. Candidates know that because minorities tend to concentrate in areas with a large number of votes, the minority can make the difference between receiving all the votes from that state, and receiving none of the votes from that state. In continuation, The Electoral College contributes to the political stability of the…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When the United States first gained its independence, a set of laws and regulations had to be formulated in order to keep the country running. The Founding fathers came up with these laws and regulations in a meeting now known as the constitutional convention. In this convention, the method for electing the president and vice president was created and it was called the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a method the United States uses to vote for the president and vice president. It was first created back in 1787 and over the years it has been ratified continuously to keep up with society’s changes.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the founding of the Constitution, it was assumed the general population would be far too uneducated to properly elect their representatives. From this unfortunately accurate presumption, came the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a gift from the founding fathers that has, in turn, counteracted the impact of low voter turnout.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College always has it’s print on the elections and more importantly on the very close elections. It has done it’s job the over 200 plus years and throughout fifty presidential elections. So the electoral college is promising and durable. Both parties Republican and Democrat candidate feel at times as if they win the popular vote they win the election, but that’s when the electoral votes play their part. The electoral votes are combined by states…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bush was outpolled by Al Gore in the 2000 election. It was a victory short-lived due to the fact that Bush was the fourth president elected despite losing the popular vote. It is in fact, true that one can win the popular vote, but loose the Electoral College. Knowing this, many eyebrows have been raised over the Electoral College. According to Chapman, there have been numerous bills brought before congress to amend this issue, but would have no chance of passing. Chapman believes that the minority of senators from the overrepresented states would not allow the amendment to pass. Today, there is a movement calling for a more democratic alternative. This movement is called the National Popular Vote Plan. The main plan is have all states to agree to allocate their electoral college votes who wins the national popular vote, no matter which candidate wins in their state. This is similar to how Maine and Nebraska do their vote actually known as “populational proportion” . Chapman also believes that allowing the addition of two senators to each state changes the proportion of how much an individual vote is worth in each state. Additionally, he believes the Electoral College violates the one person, one vote rule which is a vital rule of a modern democracy. Gallup polls from 1944 to 2004 states that the majority of Americans would like to see the Electoral College abolished. (Chapman, 2012, p. 1.23). The United States Constitution does include a clause for…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous negative points to having the Electoral College. The Electoral College weighs the votes from smaller states more than larger ones because each state's electoral votes are equivalent to the number of House and Senate seats it has, thus giving one of those smaller state’s votes the power to really make a difference. Secondly, the Electoral College only acknowledges majority votes of the states and ignore the minority votes. Those who do not agree with everyone else are not represented at all.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another example is the 2000 election, the president candidate Al Gore won the popular vote, however, the other president candidate George W. Bush won the electoral college (Mayer). This occasions hasn’t happened recently, it also happened in the early election history three instances: 1876, 1888 and 1960 (Edwards 62). As a result of these elections, it ignores the will of the people. United States is built with democracy and it seemed that electoral college is an undemocratic system. Jonathan Chait, an American liberal commentator and writer for New York magazine, argues that “the electoral college failed to mention the most egregious aspect of the process: it subverts democracy. It makes an utter mockery of the principle of one man, one vote.,” (“Electoral College, Pros”). It questions if the Electoral College favors the people at…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College is a process that involves the electors and the congress they meet to vote for the president and vice president. The Electoral College has five hundred thirty eight electors. Out of those five hundred thirty eight electors, only two hundred seventy are required to elect the president. Each state has their own group of electors. People help choose their electoral vote when they choose their candidate. Each candidate has a group of electors before you even vote for them. “Winner-Take-All” is an award of all electors to the winning presidential candidate. When the presidential election is over your governor gives a Certificate of Ascertainment saying all of the candidates who ran for your president in your state also with the electors as well. The certificate that the governor gives also announces who won your state as president and it shows which electors will be representing your state at the meeting of the electors in…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    thinking of the 2000 U.S. presidential election -- Gore won the popular vote (more Americans voted for him), but Bush actually won the presidency, because he was awarded the majority of the votes in the Electoral College.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even disregarding the loophole of faithless electors, the U.S. Electoral College system has failed the United States a number of times, most recently in the 2000 election. In the presidential elections in 1876, 1888, and 2000, the Electoral College elected the…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Electoral College is a group of Electors appointed by each state considering the sum of the amount of Senators and Representatives of each state, and their main job is to vote for the President representing the votes of all the qualified voters in the state (US Const. art. II, sec 1). Notwithstanding that they were supposed to represent the people of the votes in the state, the representatives of the Electoral College from each state gave all their votes to the candidate that gets the majority of votes from a person in the state (US Const. amend. XII). There are two cases in the history of a candidate for President getting a popular vote through the states, but losing the election because of the way the Electoral College works, in 1888 and 2000 (Lapsansky-Werner et al 182). This makes the Electoral College not quite fitting the democratic ideals, but the people’s vote still matter in some way.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays