Preview

Why Did the Liberals Win the 1906 General Election by a Landslide?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did the Liberals Win the 1906 General Election by a Landslide?
Why did the Liberals win the 1906 General Election by a landslide?

After the Conservative Prime Minister (A. J. Balfour) resigned, the Liberals called a general election in 1906, and won by a ‘landslide’. Whether the Liberals won the election by such a large margin by their own success or the failure of the Conservatives is debatable. Many factors contributed to the outcome of this. Those who see it as a positive win for the Liberals argue it is due to the bringing in on New Liberalism and its plans on Social Reform, at a time when the welfare of the majority of citizens, the working class, was becoming a key concern. The issues that had split the Liberal Party had been put to one side, like Irish Home Rule and The Boer War was over, which meant the party was stronger because there was agreement throughout. They were strongly united over the issue of Free Trade which was very popular among voters, especially working class, as they feared food prices would increase from Tariff Reform. The Liberals also cleverly used the downfalls of the Conservatives and exploited them at this time, for example, they using the Conservatives misjudgements regarding education and licensing and promising Welsh Disestablishment they were able to win the votes of a lot of non-conformists. Another key factor in the Liberals win was the Lib-Lab pact, by making this deal, they tried to ensure a majority vote for the centre and left wing parties which was a smart move. However, others have argued that rather than showing a positive reaction to progressive Liberalism, the result reflected an overwhelming rejection of Conservative policies. The main and perhaps one of the most damaging issue for the Conservatives was the Boer War; though it had originally benefited the Conservatives in 1900, promoting patriotism and helping them win the 1900 election, by 1906 there had been more deaths than Britain expected and it had been much more drawn out. The Boer War also helped unveil the poverty

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was the winner of the 1935 federal election, but what made the voters choose them over the other parties in the election? To begin, the leader of the party J.S. Woodsworth, was able to persuade voters with motivational speeches, respond to voter questions with confidence, and the party platform was also well written and balanced. To begin, a contributing factor to the success of the CCF were the motivational and persuasive speeches by the leader of the party, J.S. Woodsworth. He appealed to the entire audience and his party was in the center of attention. Additionally, the CCF were able to respond proficiently to questions posed by the voters with detail and clarity which led to voter confidence.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was the first time the Liberals were reunited since the Boer war. This aided them in an attempt to reunite there votes aswell. This meant that they were the second biggest party after the conservatives. All they needed to do was show the weaknesses of Balfour. The final nail in the coffin was having a decisive manifesto over free trede and how they refused to do it in case it harmed the working class. It was most important to appease the working class because they were the majority of the vote but they were also the poorest people able to vote with decisiveness.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early years, the campaign to enfranchise women was undoubtedly endorsed by the Liberals. The general election of 1906 resulted in a Liberal landslide and with this victory, the hopes of all those pressing for the enfranchisement of women were raised high. The party’s initial huge majority gave the government the power to enfranchise votes for women. However, the Liberals were apprehensive and no more willing than its Conservative predecessors to support the cause of women’s suffrage because of their fear that property-owning women would vote Conservative. Although many members of the Liberal Party were privately supportive of women’s suffrage including the influential David Lloyd George this was not in concord with the main party line. This essay will argue source 17’s claim that the Liberal Party did not ‘care a straw’ for women’s suffrage.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changing Work Patterns

    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gough Whitlam was the first Prime Minister of Australia to be dismissed from office, by the then-Governor-General Sir John Kerr. The dismissal was the most dramatic day in Australian political history, however the causes cannot be pinpointed to just one reason. Among other minor factors, it can be determined that the dismissal of Whitlam’s government was caused by the Senate’s acts of blocking supply and breaking political conventions, and the Governor-General’s actions against convention.…

    • 760 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the First World War played quite a large role in the growth of the labour party there were many other factors that contributed to their rise in popularity. Such as, the split of the coalition, the representation of the peoples act, and finally Clause IV.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Whigs electoral victory of 1832, how was it that the Tories were able to win the election in 1841, there were many factors that contributed to the enormous decline in Whig support during the reform years. The Whigs were running out of ideas by 1835. There was increasing economic depression, defections to the other side of the House occurred, the Whig ministries witnessed the rise of public pressure groups, the Whigs were viewed as being cynical and devious after the Litchfield House Compact. In comparison, the Conservative Party’s strength showed a huge increase after the passing of the Reform Act due to party organization under the Carlton Club and Registration Societies, the strength of Peel as a politician and the Conservatives' willingness not to use their power and influence in the House of Lords unconstitutionally.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1935 election the Liberals campaigned by saying that Conservatives had stolen most of their new reforms from the Liberals, who were better able to operate them. The depression gave King his greatest Parliamentary majority up to that time, 171 seats out of 245.…

    • 3163 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Election Of 1896 Analysis

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was the last election in which a candidate tried to win the White House with mostly agricultural votes. The election of 1896 is foreseen as the introduction of a new era in American politics and is believed to be one of the most influential elections of all time. The late nineteenth-century brought about many changes politically, economically and socially in America (Goldfield, Abbot, Anderson, Argersinger, & Argersinger, 2014). During the depression of the 1890s and President Cleveland’s reluctance to utilize the centralized assets to support the unwaged, unstable incensed farmers and workers from the Democratic Party. During the mid-1800s elections, Democrats underwent an enormous Congressional seat shortfall whereas the Republicans and Populists individually accomplished significant gains. As the presidential election of 1896 drew closer and political leaders worked to characterize party platforms, currency guidelines became the fiercest concern. Even…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Labour Party, before the start of the war in 1914, had a total of 36 seats. In the general election of 1902, the party under the name LRC had one just two seats. This seems a remarkable feat in just over a decade. However some historians argue that Labour, in actual fact made little or no progress at all during this period. This seems to be an astonishing statement to make considering the number of MPs accumulated by the party in such a short space of time. Nevertheless, there is evidence which supports this historical view. The Labour Party, in the 1910 general election had gathered 42 MPs; however this was reduced to the figure of 36, by a string of by-election defeats. This according to some historians shows Labour’s progress stagnating after an ‘electrifying start,’ which captured the imaginations of many. In addition to this before 1910, the Liberals enjoyed a considerable overall majority; however this freedom was ended by the 1910 general election. This had a devastating impact on Labour, as it was the Irish National Party, not they who held the balance of power, as the INP were twice the size of Labour. Labour was thus side-lined, in parliament which many historians use as a sign of Labour’s infant, stagnating influence within British politics. As historians disagree over the impact the party made and its political strength, the question is, had Labour made significant progress towards establishing itself as an independent and influential political party?…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason contributing to the Conservative defeat was due to the social conditions of Britain and the Conservatives failure to improve these shocking conditions. For example, the Boer War highlighted that 69% of recruits were deemed unfit for service because of the extent of malnutrition present in British society which revealed the severe effect of poverty in the cities and the desperate need for social reforms. The Bore war also created a huge financial burden and 22,000 British soldiers died which was a lot more than expected, this startled British society and strengthened the call for social reforms. Another factor strengthening the need for social reforms was the 1901 Rowntree Report which highlighted that 30% of people lived below the poverty line in York and Charles Booth Report 27% of London lived below the poverty line. However, the Conservatives failed to hear these calls and neglected Britain’s plead for reformation and only introduced the 1902 Education Act which didn’t solve any problems to do with living conditions. The reason this was possibly the most significant reason for Conservative defeat in 1906 was because it was the first time Britain was made aware of their extent of malnutrition and it was worrying so they wanted something done but Conservatives didn’t even attempt to solve this. The Liberals argued that the state should play a larger role in improving living standards which helped gained the vote from the working classes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major differences of those views caused a great split among the people of Great Britain and set the tone for the political battle that would continue through the Reign of Queen Victoria. Prior to the Victorian Era, political groups known as the Whigs and the Tories existed. These two contradicting parties were the basis of the great rivalry to come. The main belief system of the Whigs was passed on to and continued by the Liberal Party. They believed in the power of the people, what people could do if given the opportunity and liberal freedom. This is referred to as individualism and was a main platform for the Liberals. Also, ideas such as increasing education, letting go of traditional Church values, and restricting the power of the monarchy with a more equal parliament were all defining motives for the party to keep fighting against their constant Conservative enemy. This enemy to the Liberal party had their own strict beliefs that they would fight hard and long for.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet British people trusted the Labour party during the 1945 general election. What does this general election represented for the future of Britain? I shall analyse the question through the study of their manifesto. First I shall examine how the war period made a difference for the Labour party, then what the party embodied and finally what Attlee’s ministry resulted in.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Herbert Asquith

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Herbert Henry Asquith, (12 September 1852 – 15 February 1928) served as the Liberal Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1908 to 1916. He was the longest continuously serving Prime Minister in the twentieth century until early 1988. As Prime Minister, he led his Liberal party to a series of domestic reforms, including social insurance and the reduction of the power of the House of Lords. He led the nation into The First World War, but a series of military and political crises led to his replacement in late 1916 by David Lloyd George. His falling out with Lloyd George played a major part in the downfall of the Liberal Party. Before his term as Prime Minister he served as Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1905 to 1908 and as Home Secretary from 1892 to 1895. During his lifetime he was known as H. H. Asquith before his accession to the peerage and as Lord Oxford afterwards. Asquith was elected to Parliament in 1886 as the Liberal representative for East Fife, in Scotland. He never served as a junior minister, but achieved his first significant post in 1892 when he became Home Secretary in the fourth cabinet of Gladstone. He retained his position when Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Roseberry took over in 1894. The Liberals lost power in the 1895 general election and for ten years were in opposition. In 1898 he was offered and turned down the opportunity to lead the Liberal Party, then deeply divided and unpopular, preferring to use the opportunity to earn money as a barrister. In the 1906 election the Liberals won their greatest landslide in history. In 1908 Asquith became prime minister with a stellar cabinet of leaders from all factions of the Liberal party. Working with Lloyd George and Winston Churchill he passed the "New Liberalism" legislation setting up unemployment insurance and ending sweatshop conditions; he set the stage for the welfare state in Britain. In 1908 he introduced old age…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Politics Notes

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Labours advantages – attractive image (zeitgeist), Labour better fitted to carry out post-war construction, leading labour figures gained respect from electorate during the war, first past the post worked in Lab favour.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite many years of campaigning, by 1914 the suffrage women had not achieved the vote. There were many things holding back suffrage progression from 1860-1914 and came most significantly in the form of the Prime Minister W.E Gladstone. But how much party politics had to do with the liberals position against suffrage is not a certainty.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics