Preview

Why Do Contrarians Agree With A Scientific Consensus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1035 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do Contrarians Agree With A Scientific Consensus
Tactic #1: Presenting the public with two “equal” sides and making the scientific community seem divided. The best way that contrarians interfered with a scientific consensus was to generate doubt within the American public by creating a divide between scientists. For example, the harmfulness of acid rain was questioned when Fred Singer1 contradicted the factual evidence of his committee2 by claiming in an official government report that the causes of acid rain were not certain and that a reduction in industrial emissions would not necessarily help solve the problem.3 Both of these statements were in direct contradiction with the international scientific community, which made the consensus seem wavering and the official White House-appointed …show more content…
They have developed ties to the government through federal agencies, think tanks, and direct contact with congressman, senators, and presidents (7). Secondly, the people who are being targeted by scientists are industries with lots of money6, which have the resources to hire and provide funding to influential people who will defend their products. With strong reputations and money, contrarian scientists are perceived as “experts” with “informed opinions” and thus are granted a false sense of credibility and …show more content…
Firstly, research results can be complicated and generally confusing to a nonscientist, therefore the public must convey large amounts of trust in scientists. This aids contrarians in creating a credible counterargument and splitting the scientific consensus (Task #1). Most people have no scientific baseline from which to make informed opinions so they gather information from “experts” from both sides of a scientific story. Secondly, science in general is an objective project, scientists stress that their results are always falsifiable and that continued research is necessary to strengthen a scientific finding. For example, Roger Revelle started a talk to the AAAS about climate change by saying, “There is a good but by no means certain chance that the world’s average climate will become significantly warmer during the next century” (191). Contrarians used this ambiguous statement as a way to show that scientists are unsure of their work, when in fact there is no “certain chance” in any scientific trend. In order to remain trustworthy, scientists must always instill a sense of impartiality that is misconstrued as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During a passage from the Great Influenza, author John M. Barry discusses the qualifications a scientific researcher must yield in order to be efficient to the field and perform intelligent guesswork. Appealing to inspiring scientists, Barry insists that they have to “manipulate and even force experiments to yield and answer.” Without the ability to work with uncertainty, no work done will be enough to illuminate the subject. Through juxtaposition uncertainty and certainty in this professional field, Barry showcases the classifications of scientists with analogies and metaphors in a catalogue form. Barry begins by promptly identifying the counter argument; how uncertainty is a weakness for a scientist.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry presents rhetorical strategies as a means to characterize scientific research. He thinks that being a “scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Scientific research can be courageous and dangerous. In science, people tend to doubt scientists because their discoveries it seems unreal. Even scientists such as Einstein probably doubted his own theory until his predictions were tested.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social-behavioral science aspect can be seen in the anti-vaccine following gained by Jenny McCarthy and the other anti-vaccine activists. When certain influential people are given a media platform to express their beliefs and opinions on a topic, regardless of having any backing from the scientific community, there is a higher chance that their message will be received well and continue to grow on society. The public may not be receiving accurate information on vaccine immunization, but they will continue to believe what they want to because it fits their agenda and they have a significantly large group supporting their same claims.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Believe it or not, it was once illegal to teach the theory of evolution to children in school. A teacher in Tennessee named John Scopes had violated this law in the 1900s, which resulted in the John Scopes trial. This trial marked the shift of the beliefs of Americans from religion to science. Scientific research has been going on for decades and it has, for the most part, helped improve our lives, but it is a very tough field. In The Great Influenza, author John M. Barry used juxtaposition, listing, and structure to characterize scientific research as a challenging and uncertain field that requires a lot of courage to accept defeat, but also have the determination…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specter And Gawande

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Together Specter and Gawande both touch upon science, journalism and public policies in their own style. Gawande writes about science that has already been proven to be beneficial but slow at implementation. Antisepsis, anesthesia, kangaroo care and oral rehydration were all researched, experimented and proven to be the best solution for each pressing problem. Although people doubted the actual use of each treatment, they could not argue with scientific facts of benefits. On the contrary, Specter writes about science that is still in the process of research and experiment. The new and upcoming idea is gene rewriting with CRISPR is still a topic that fully researched and proven to be beneficial; many people still even fear it’s use. The unknown…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although language that produces fear can be effective, it is also something that cannot be done in good conscience. In examining this, I think that it is important to again think about politics’ place in science. Politics should not bring about fear when…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tone of the article is serious and skeptical to make the audience aware of the importance of the subject and it is proven by the fact the author is always questioning the scientific method and if it truly correct “[s]cientist know what they want, and can influence the results they…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Largent addresses how the amount of trust the public places on researchers and program runners in the vaccine industry determines the success of immunizing children (136). Largent comments on the previously mentioned Jenny McCarthy, famous for her time as a comedian and model, whose advocacy of the anti-vaccination movement has “Solidified her position in the community of parents of autistic children, and further publicized her assertion that vaccines are one of the principal causes of autism,” (145). Although she is not medically qualified to speak on the topic, she is trusted and influential enough to spread the fear of vaccinations to parents all over America. Furthermore McCarthy, just as countless other authoritative figures in the media, blatantly disregarding the reliable scientific data proving her assertions incorrect (147). Adam Burgess compares the concept of McCarthyism, action of accusing someone or something without any evidence, to the behavior of figures in media such as Jenny McCarthy, as an “alarmist authority encouraging mass anxiety,” (334). Celebrities' influence dominates discourse online as well. While the internet's ability to spread information faster than anything else has always worried scientists, several analyzes show that despite the abundance of…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pursuit of scientific knowledge has often been believed to be an exploration in which information is gathered solely from experimentation, but people are slow to realize that experimentation is only one way, among a variety of ways, in which scientists gather information. In their pursuit of new scientific knowledge, scientists may conduct surveys, or build on pre-existing information using assumptions and theories, along with experimentation, in order to obtain knowledge in any particular scientific field. That which the scientists determine as knowledge, however, does not always mirror that which the public receives as new scientific knowledge. Along the path of distribution of this knowledge, the influences of economics, morality and political beliefs can taint pure scientific knowledge discovered by the scientist.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There cannot be good without evil. This is one of the most important lessons that I have learned growing up and I will keep this close by me as I get even older. Conflict between two ideals is a great place to find meaning and lenses for us to view our world. I had this conflict with myself starting at a young age. This conflict came about when I started thinking about what I wanted to do with my life.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    New knowledge in natural science can be gained by falsification. Falsification makes you change the model of belief; however the new changes the model of belief but doesn’t discredit the previous model. It only shows that the new model is more reliable. Different methodology, uncertainty and evaluation in natural science…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Facing so many environmental issues in the current decade, including global warming, heavy pollution and energy crisis, scientists have done tens of thousands of researches into them, providing countless scientific evidences to convince people that these issues are real, and we must react immediately to alleviate the situation. According to IPCC Synthesis Report in 2012, 70 percent of Americans believe global warming is real (Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies). However, global temperature is still on an alarming rising trend. As a result, it is my belief that scientific evidence standalone would not be enough to alter people’s behaviors significantly.…

    • 2228 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific theories are fundamentally characterized by being based on empirical observation which explains a range of factual phenomena and has been verifiably tested in a meaningful way based on specific predictions deduced from the theory. Thus, scientific theories are falsifiable.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pseudoscience, Against

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Regardless of how trivial the issue or product may be, in the broader spectrum of things it makes people more susceptible to ideas of pseudoscience, like a chain effect. The more people believing it, the more people will follow as humans naturally follow trends so not to fall out of normality – just like anything, people adapt to the culture and beliefs of their surroundings, something extremely hard to brake. Furthermore, if a person believes in one concept of pseudoscience, they are far more likely to believe in another; their unreason would even go as far as segueing into other parts of the person’s life, making them incapable or too lazy to determine the most reasonable and proven facts before making an important, or even trivial decision. Conclusively, a ‘climate of unreason’ is a very dangerous concept; in order for society to eliminate false beliefs and continue to discover the vast wonders of science and even just making important decisions in our daily lives affecting our finance, well-being and health, pseudoscience is taking all those who believe in it a step back and hindering them from contributing to a…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays