Why Do Prison Should Be Rehabilitation?

Although prison education and rehabilitation programs are offered in some prisons in the United States, there are still numerous prisons that haven’t implemented them. The purpose of these programs is to educate prisoners and prevent re-offense. However, the issue comes down to determining to what extent the purpose of imprisonment should be rehabilitation because some argue that punishment’s enough to educate prisoners. In contrast, proponents of these programs argue that it’s essential prisoners take time in prison to learn because from a social standpoint, reintegrating into society will present challenges that prisoners need to anticipate. However, although some agree prisoners should be rehabilitated, they also argue that the current system should be changed to make education more efficient and effective.
Goodwill Industries (GI), a non-profit organization that provides job services for disabled people, published a pamphlet that advertises for prison education. GI claims that almost all of those who are released “have a physical health, mental health or substance abuse problem,” with 40% of men and 60% of women having more than one of these conditions (Turner 9). Furthermore, the challenges
He claims that before imprisonment, he had decent jobs. However, after release, he “struggled to find stable employment” and reoffended (Lindley). Because of this, he explains how his skill set for masonry arts no longer benefited him because no one’s willing to employ him anymore. Speight argues for prison education because he claims that prisons often “do a fairly poor job of helping to set up successful integration,” leaving people “to their own devices… where they go next” (Lindley). Speight successfully supports his argument that prison education’s necessary with his own experiences, which detail the hardships of reintegration after